• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水中分娩后的新生儿结局:某区综合医院的安全性评估

Neonatal Outcomes Following Delivery in Water: Evaluation of Safety in a District General Hospital.

作者信息

Peacock Phil J, Zengeya Stanley T, Cochrane Lesley, Sleath Maxine

机构信息

Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children.

Department of Paediatrics, Great Western Hospital, Swindon.

出版信息

Cureus. 2018 Feb 20;10(2):e2208. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2208.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.2208
PMID:29686950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5910013/
Abstract

Introduction Giving birth in water has increased in popularity over recent years, with potential benefits in terms of maternal comfort and decreased rates of instrumental delivery. Some concerns have been raised about possible adverse neonatal outcomes, including hypothermia and respiratory distress. There is not currently, however, a clear consensus in the literature. This study sought to assess the safety of delivering in water for low-risk vaginal deliveries in a District General Hospital in the United Kingdom. Methods Prospectively collected hospital data was obtained for all deliveries between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2016 at the Great Western Hospital, Swindon. The dataset was limited to full-term babies born by unassisted vaginal delivery following spontaneous labour; 3507 babies were included in the analyses. Pre-specified outcomes included neonatal unit admission, Apgar scores, and temperature after delivery. Results During the two-year period studied, there were 592 waterbirths and 2915 non-waterbirths. There was no significant difference in rates of neonatal unit admission between waterbirths and non-waterbirths. One-minute Apgar scores were slightly higher among those born in water (P = 0.04); this difference attenuated by five minutes of age. There was no difference in temperature after delivery between the two groups. Conclusions An evaluation of safety in a District General Hospital has demonstrated similar postnatal outcomes among babies born in water, compared to those born on land. Further work examining longer-term outcomes would help assess whether this persists beyond the newborn period.

摘要

引言 近年来,水中分娩越来越受欢迎,在产妇舒适度和降低器械助产率方面具有潜在益处。有人对可能出现的不良新生儿结局提出了一些担忧,包括体温过低和呼吸窘迫。然而,目前文献中尚无明确的共识。本研究旨在评估英国一家地区综合医院中低风险阴道分娩进行水中分娩的安全性。

方法 前瞻性收集了2014年4月1日至2016年3月31日期间在斯温顿的大西部医院所有分娩的医院数据。数据集仅限于自然分娩后经阴道顺产的足月儿;3507名婴儿纳入分析。预先设定的结局包括新生儿病房入住情况、阿氏评分和出生后体温。

结果 在研究的两年期间,有592例水中分娩和2915例非水中分娩。水中分娩和非水中分娩的新生儿病房入住率无显著差异。水中出生的婴儿1分钟阿氏评分略高(P = 0.04);这种差异在出生5分钟时减弱。两组出生后体温无差异。

结论 在一家地区综合医院进行的安全性评估表明,与陆地出生的婴儿相比,水中出生的婴儿产后结局相似。进一步研究长期结局将有助于评估这种情况在新生儿期之后是否持续存在。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf5/5910013/fc8eac3fc81b/cureus-0010-00000002208-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf5/5910013/fc8eac3fc81b/cureus-0010-00000002208-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bf5/5910013/fc8eac3fc81b/cureus-0010-00000002208-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Neonatal Outcomes Following Delivery in Water: Evaluation of Safety in a District General Hospital.水中分娩后的新生儿结局:某区综合医院的安全性评估
Cureus. 2018 Feb 20;10(2):e2208. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2208.
2
A comparative study between the pioneer cohort of waterbirths and conventional vaginal deliveries in an obstetrician-led unit in Singapore.新加坡一家由产科医生主导的机构中,水中分娩先驱队列与传统阴道分娩的比较研究。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;55(3):363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.04.012.
3
The effect of waterbirth on neonatal mortality and morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.水中分娩对新生儿死亡率和发病率的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):180-231. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2105.
4
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well-being.分娩时对胎儿心率进行间歇性听诊以评估胎儿健康状况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 13;2(2):CD008680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008680.pub2.
5
Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.分娩早期的评估与支持以改善分娩结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 20;4(4):CD011516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011516.pub2.
6
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour.第二产程的屏气/用力方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 9(10):CD009124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub2.
7
Waterbirths were associated with low pain relief during delivery, high breastfeeding success and healthy newborn infants.水中分娩与分娩过程中的低疼痛缓解、高母乳喂养成功率和健康新生儿有关。
Acta Paediatr. 2022 Oct;111(10):1885-1890. doi: 10.1111/apa.16467. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
8
A prospective cohort study comparing neonatal outcomes of waterbirth and land birth in an Australian tertiary maternity unit.一项在澳大利亚三级产科医院进行的比较水中分娩和陆地分娩新生儿结局的前瞻性队列研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Feb;63(1):59-65. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13555. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
9
A retrospective comparison of waterbirth outcomes in two United States hospital settings.回顾性比较美国两家医院的水中分娩结局。
Birth. 2020 Mar;47(1):98-104. doi: 10.1111/birt.12473. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
10
Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries.基兰德旋转产钳分娩:与旋转胎头吸引术或第二产程剖宫产分娩的母婴结局比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Nov;254:175-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.026. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Water Immersion Versus Epidural as Analgesic Methods during Labor among Low-Risk Women: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.低风险女性分娩期间水浸与硬膜外麻醉作为镇痛方法的效果:一项10年回顾性队列研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 25;12(19):1919. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191919.
2
Safety and Effect of the Use of Hydrotherapy during Labour: A Retrospective Observational Study.分娩期间使用水疗法的安全性和效果:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 28;12(17):5617. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175617.
3
Systematic review and meta-analysis to examine intrapartum interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes following immersion in water during labour and waterbirth.

本文引用的文献

1
Immersion in water during labour and birth.分娩过程中浸泡在水中。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 16;5(5):CD000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4.
2
The effects of immersion in water on labor, birth and newborn and comparison with epidural analgesia and conventional vaginal delivery.水中分娩对产程、分娩及新生儿的影响,并与硬膜外镇痛和传统阴道分娩进行比较。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2012 Mar 1;13(1):45-9. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2012.03. eCollection 2012.
3
Immersion in water for pain relief and the risk of intrapartum transfer among low risk nulliparous women: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study.
系统回顾和荟萃分析,以检查分娩期间和水中分娩时浸入水中的产时干预措施以及母婴结局。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 5;12(7):e056517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056517.
低风险初产妇水中浸泡缓解疼痛及产时转诊风险:出生地全国前瞻性队列研究的二次分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Feb 6;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-60.
4
Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obstetric units in Italy: prospective observational study.在意大利产科病房使用分娩池的分娩妇女:前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 14;14:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-17.
5
Neonatal respiratory consequences from water birth.水中分娩对新生儿呼吸系统的影响。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 May;48(5):419-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02241.x. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
6
Experience of water birth delivery in Iran.伊朗水中分娩的经验。
Arch Iran Med. 2009 Sep;12(5):468-71.
7
Interobserver variability of the 5-minute Apgar score.5分钟阿氏评分的观察者间变异性。
J Pediatr. 2006 Oct;149(4):486-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.05.040.
8
Water birth, more than a trendy alternative: a prospective, observational study.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006 Oct;274(6):355-65. doi: 10.1007/s00404-006-0208-1. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
9
Underwater birth and neonatal respiratory distress.水下分娩与新生儿呼吸窘迫
BMJ. 2005 May 7;330(7499):1071-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7499.1071.
10
Underwater birth: missing the evidence or missing the point?水下分娩:是缺乏证据还是不得要领?
Pediatrics. 2003 Oct;112(4):972-3.