• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生及执业支持人员在初级卫生保健中使用健康与生活方式筛查应用程序的经验:实施案例研究

Experiences of General Practitioners and Practice Support Staff Using a Health and Lifestyle Screening App in Primary Health Care: Implementation Case Study.

作者信息

Webb Marianne Julie, Wadley Greg, Sanci Lena Amanda

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 24;6(4):e105. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8778.

DOI:10.2196/mhealth.8778
PMID:29691209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5941099/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Technology-based screening of young people for mental health disorders and health compromising behaviors in general practice increases the disclosure of sensitive health issues and improves patient-centered care. However, few studies investigate how general practitioners (GPs) and practice support staff (receptionists and practice managers) integrate screening technology into their routine work, including the problems that arise and how the staff surmount them.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the implementation of a health and lifestyle screening app, Check Up GP, for young people aged 14 to 25 years attending an Australian general practice.

METHODS

We conducted an in-depth implementation case study of Check Up GP in one general practice clinic, with methodology informed by action research. Semistructured interviews and focus groups were conducted with GPs and support staff at the end of the implementation period. Data were thematically analyzed and mapped to normalization process theory constructs. We also analyzed the number of times we supported staff, the location where young people completed Check Up GP, and whether they felt they had sufficient privacy and received a text messaging (short message service, SMS) link at the time of taking their appointment.

RESULTS

A total of 4 GPs and 10 support staff at the clinic participated in the study, with all except 3 receptionists participating in the final interviews and focus groups. During the 2-month implementation period, the technology and administration of Check Up GP was iterated through 4 major quality improvement cycles in response to the needs of the staff. This resulted in a reduction in the average time taken to complete Check Up GP from 14 min to 10 min, improved SMS text messaging for young people, and a more consistent description of the app by receptionists to young people. In the first weeks of implementation, researchers needed to regularly support staff with the app's administration; however, this support decreased over time, even as usage rose slightly. The majority of young people (73/87, 84%) completed Check Up GP in the waiting room, with less than half (35/80, 44%) having received an SMS from the clinic with a link to the tool. Participating staff valued Check Up GP, particularly its facilitation of youth-friendly practice. However, there was at first a lack of organizational systems and capacity to implement the app and also initially a reliance on researchers to facilitate the process.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a screening app in the dynamic and time-restricted general practice setting presents a range of technical and administrative challenges. Successful implementation of a screening app is possible but requires adequate time and intensive facilitation. More resources, external to staff, are needed to drive and support sustainable technology innovation and implementation in general practice settings.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/432c/5941099/5643533135d1/mhealth_v6i4e105_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/432c/5941099/5643533135d1/mhealth_v6i4e105_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/432c/5941099/5643533135d1/mhealth_v6i4e105_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

在全科医疗中,基于技术对年轻人进行心理健康障碍和危害健康行为的筛查,能增加敏感健康问题的披露,并改善以患者为中心的护理。然而,很少有研究调查全科医生(GP)和诊所支持人员(接待员和诊所经理)如何将筛查技术融入日常工作,包括出现的问题以及工作人员如何克服这些问题。

目的

本研究旨在调查一款针对14至25岁澳大利亚全科医疗就诊年轻人的健康与生活方式筛查应用程序Check Up GP的实施情况。

方法

我们在一家全科医疗诊所对Check Up GP进行了深入的实施案例研究,采用行动研究法提供方法指导。在实施期结束时,对全科医生和支持人员进行了半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论。对数据进行了主题分析,并映射到正常化过程理论结构。我们还分析了支持工作人员的次数、年轻人完成Check Up GP的地点,以及他们在预约时是否觉得有足够的隐私并收到短信链接。

结果

该诊所共有4名全科医生和10名支持人员参与了研究,除3名接待员外,其他人都参与了最终访谈和焦点小组讨论。在为期2个月的实施期内,根据工作人员的需求,Check Up GP的技术和管理经过了4个主要的质量改进周期。这使得完成Check Up GP的平均时间从14分钟减少到10分钟,改善了对年轻人的短信服务,接待员对该应用程序向年轻人的描述也更加一致。在实施的最初几周,研究人员需要定期为工作人员提供该应用程序管理方面的支持;然而,随着时间的推移,这种支持减少了,尽管使用率略有上升。大多数年轻人(87人中的73人,84%)在候诊室完成了Check Up GP,只有不到一半(80人中的35人,44%)收到过诊所发送的带有该工具链接的短信。参与的工作人员重视Check Up GP,特别是它有助于开展对年轻人友好的医疗服务。然而,起初缺乏实施该应用程序的组织系统和能力,而且最初依赖研究人员来推动这一过程。

结论

在动态且时间有限的全科医疗环境中实施筛查应用程序会带来一系列技术和管理挑战。成功实施筛查应用程序是可能的,但需要足够的时间和大力推动。需要更多外部于工作人员的资源,以推动和支持全科医疗环境中的可持续技术创新与实施。

相似文献

1
Experiences of General Practitioners and Practice Support Staff Using a Health and Lifestyle Screening App in Primary Health Care: Implementation Case Study.全科医生及执业支持人员在初级卫生保健中使用健康与生活方式筛查应用程序的经验:实施案例研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 24;6(4):e105. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8778.
2
Improving Patient-Centered Care for Young People in General Practice With a Codesigned Screening App: Mixed Methods Study.通过联合设计的筛查应用程序改善全科医疗中以患者为中心的青少年护理:混合方法研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Aug 11;5(8):e118. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7816.
3
Using Text Messaging Surveys in General Practice Research to Engage With People From Low-Income Groups: Multi-Methods Study.在一般实践研究中使用短信调查与低收入群体进行互动:多方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Sep 5;12:e55354. doi: 10.2196/55354.
4
5
Implementing a text message-based intervention to support type 2 diabetes medication adherence in primary care: a qualitative study with general practice staff.在基层医疗中实施基于短信的干预措施以支持 2 型糖尿病药物治疗依从性:一项针对全科医疗工作人员的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 10;23(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09571-9.
6
Implementing cardiometabolic health checks in general practice: a qualitative process evaluation.在全科医疗中实施心脏代谢健康检查:一项定性过程评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Jul 6;15:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-132.
7
Uptake of a primary care atrial fibrillation screening program (AF-SMART): a realist evaluation of implementation in metropolitan and rural general practice.初级保健心房颤动筛查计划(AF-SMART)的采用情况:对大都市和农村全科实践中实施情况的实际评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Dec 6;20(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1058-9.
8
9
Responding to Young People's Health Risks in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomised Trial of Training Clinicians in Screening and Motivational Interviewing.应对初级保健中年轻人的健康风险:一项针对临床医生进行筛查和动机性访谈培训的整群随机试验
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0137581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137581. eCollection 2015.
10
Implementation of cardiovascular disease prevention in primary health care: enhancing understanding using normalisation process theory.初级卫生保健中心血管疾病预防的实施:运用常态化过程理论增进理解
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Feb 24;18(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0580-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: implementation strategies derived from normalization process theory.实施评估与研究的转化框架:源自常态化过程理论的实施策略
Implement Sci. 2025 Jul 27;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01444-5.
2
An Online Preoperative Screening Tool to Optimize Care for Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: A Mixed-Method Study Protocol.一种优化癌症手术患者护理的在线术前筛查工具:一项混合方法研究方案。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 3;17(5):861. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050861.
3
The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Patient-Centered Care for Young People in General Practice With a Codesigned Screening App: Mixed Methods Study.通过联合设计的筛查应用程序改善全科医疗中以患者为中心的青少年护理:混合方法研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Aug 11;5(8):e118. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7816.
2
Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update).影响电子健康实施的因素:系统评价的系统综述(更新版)
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 26;11(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7.
3
Does screening for and intervening with multiple health compromising behaviours and mental health disorders amongst young people attending primary care improve health outcomes? A systematic review.
电子健康使用对大流行前普通实践工作量的影响:系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11524-9.
4
Implementing a text message-based intervention to support type 2 diabetes medication adherence in primary care: a qualitative study with general practice staff.在基层医疗中实施基于短信的干预措施以支持 2 型糖尿病药物治疗依从性:一项针对全科医疗工作人员的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 10;23(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09571-9.
5
Digital Facilitation to Support Patient Access to Web-Based Primary Care Services: Scoping Literature Review.数字便利化支持患者获取基于网络的初级保健服务:范围文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 14;24(7):e33911. doi: 10.2196/33911.
6
Best Practices and Lessons Learned for Action Research in eHealth Design and Implementation: Literature Review.电子健康设计与实施中的行动研究最佳实践和经验教训:文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 28;24(1):e31795. doi: 10.2196/31795.
7
Working with Young People at Risk of Suicidal Behaviour and Self-Harm: A Qualitative Study of Australian General Practitioners' Perspectives.与有自杀行为和自残风险的年轻人合作:澳大利亚全科医生观点的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 8;18(24):12926. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412926.
8
Implementing the Routine Use of Electronic Mental Health Screening for Youth in Primary Care: Systematic Review.在初级保健中对青少年实施电子心理健康筛查的常规应用:系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Nov 19;8(11):e30479. doi: 10.2196/30479.
9
Recruiting general practitioners and patients with dementia into a cluster randomised controlled trial: strategies, barriers and facilitators.招募全科医生和痴呆症患者参与一项整群随机对照试验:策略、障碍和促进因素。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 30;21(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01253-6.
10
Implementation Strategies for Web-Based Apps for Screening: Scoping Review.基于网络的应用程序筛查实施策略:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e15591. doi: 10.2196/15591.
对初级保健机构中的年轻人进行多种危害健康行为和心理健康障碍的筛查及干预,是否能改善健康结局?一项系统评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Aug 4;17:104. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0504-1.
4
The care work of general practice receptionists.全科医疗接待员的护理工作。
J Prim Health Care. 2016 Jun;8(2):122-9. doi: 10.1071/HC15059.
5
Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007-14.英国初级医疗保健的临床工作量:对2007 - 2014年英格兰1亿次诊疗的回顾性分析。
Lancet. 2016 Jun 4;387(10035):2323-2330. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00620-6. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
6
Tools to overcome potential barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice: Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of a complex intervention.全科医疗中克服衣原体筛查潜在障碍的工具:一项复杂干预措施实施情况的定性评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 22;17:33. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0430-2.
7
Achieving change in primary care--causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews.实现初级保健变革——证据与实践差距的成因:综述的系统评价
Implement Sci. 2016 Mar 22;11:40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0396-4.
8
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.理解实施理论、模型和框架。
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.
9
Applying normalization process theory to understand implementation of a family violence screening and care model in maternal and child health nursing practice: a mixed method process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial.应用规范化过程理论理解家庭暴力筛查与护理模式在母婴健康护理实践中的实施:一项随机对照试验的混合方法过程评估
Implement Sci. 2015 Mar 28;10:39. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0230-4.
10
Integrating mental health into adolescent annual visits: impact of previsit comprehensive screening on within-visit processes.将心理健康纳入青少年年度体检:访前综合筛查对就诊过程的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Mar;56(3):267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.11.011. Epub 2015 Jan 10.