• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Issues in the Design of Discrete Choice Experiments.

作者信息

Norman Richard, Craig Benjamin M, Hansen Paul, Jonker Marcel F, Rose John, Street Deborah J, Mulhern Brendan

机构信息

School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.

University of Southern Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

Patient. 2019 Jun;12(3):281-285. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0346-0.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-018-0346-0
PMID:30446958
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Issues in the Design of Discrete Choice Experiments.离散选择实验设计中的问题
Patient. 2019 Jun;12(3):281-285. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0346-0.
2
On the meaningfulness of testing preference axioms in stated preference discrete choice experiments.检验选择实验中偏好公理的意义。
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Aug;13(4):409-17. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0312-4. Epub 2011 May 5.
3
Turning the spotlight on experimental design in discrete choice experiments-a focus on pragmatic approaches in health.
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.10.015.
4
Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare Discrete Choice Experiments: A Primer.医疗保健离散选择实验中的尺度异质性：入门指南。
Patient. 2018 Apr;11(2):167-173. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0282-4.
5
Using blocked fractional factorial designs to construct discrete choice experiments for healthcare studies.使用分组析因设计构建用于医疗保健研究的离散选择实验。
Stat Med. 2016 Jul 10;35(15):2543-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.6882. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
6
Simulation study to determine the impact of different design features on design efficiency in discrete choice experiments.确定离散选择实验中不同设计特征对设计效率影响的模拟研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 19;6(7):e011985. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011985.
7
Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data.最佳最差标度法与离散选择实验：使用社会关怀数据的实证比较。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 May;72(10):1717-27. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.027. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
8
Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide.医疗保健中离散选择实验的样本量要求：实用指南。
Patient. 2015 Oct;8(5):373-84. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0118-z.
9
How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity.离散选择实验在多大程度上能够预测健康选择？系统评价和元分析的外部有效性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Nov;19(8):1053-1066. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0954-6. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
10
Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?提高健康领域离散选择实验的质量：我们如何评估有效性和可靠性？
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Dec;17(6):531-542. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1389648. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining alignment of community health teams' preferences for health, equity, and spending with state all-payer waiver priorities: A discrete choice experiment.考察社区卫生团队对健康、公平和支出的偏好与州全民支付豁免重点的一致性：一项离散选择实验。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e14257. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14257. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
2
Women's preference to apply shared decision-making in breast cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment.女性在乳腺癌筛查中倾向于采用共同决策：一项离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 8;12(11):e064488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064488.
3
Do preferences differ based on respondent experience of a health issue and its treatment? A case study using a public health intervention.

本文引用的文献

1
One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation.一种方法，多种方法选择：健康状态估值离散选择实验的结构化综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jan;37(1):29-43. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0714-6.
2
Effect of Level Overlap and Color Coding on Attribute Non-Attendance in Discrete Choice Experiments.水平重叠和颜色编码对离散选择实验中属性非参与的影响。
Value Health. 2018 Jul;21(7):767-771. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
3
Symposium Title: Preference Evidence for Regulatory Decisions.
偏好是否因受访者对健康问题及其治疗的体验而异？一项使用公共卫生干预措施的案例研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Apr;24(3):413-423. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01482-6. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
4
Self-esteem in patients with venous thromboembolism predicts time trade-off values for own health.静脉血栓栓塞症患者的自尊预测自身健康状况的时间权衡值。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Mar 5;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01947-5.
5
Patient Preferences in the Medical Product Lifecycle.医疗产品生命周期中的患者偏好
Patient. 2020 Feb;13(1):7-10. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00400-y.
6
Support Tools for Preference-Sensitive Decisions in Healthcare: Where Are We? Where Do We Go? How Do We Get There?医疗保健中偏好敏感决策的支持工具：我们现在何处？我们去向何方？我们如何到达那里？
Patient. 2019 Oct;12(5):439-443. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00372-z.
研讨会主题：监管决策的偏好证据
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):467-473. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0311-y.
4
Key Issues and Potential Solutions for Understanding Healthcare Preference Heterogeneity Free from Patient-Level Scale Confounds.理解不受患者层面量表混杂因素影响的医疗保健偏好异质性的关键问题及潜在解决方案
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):463-466. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0309-5.
5
Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?提高健康领域离散选择实验的质量：我们如何评估有效性和可靠性？
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Dec;17(6):531-542. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1389648. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
6
Preference for subcutaneous or intravenous administration of rituximab among patients with untreated CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or follicular lymphoma: results from a prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover study (PrefMab).未接受治疗的 CD20+弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤或滤泡性淋巴瘤患者对利妥昔单抗皮下或静脉给药的偏好：来自一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、交叉研究（PrefMab）的结果。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):836-842. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw685.
7
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.用于医疗保健决策的多标准决策分析——简介：ISPOR多标准决策分析新兴良好实践工作组报告1
Value Health. 2016 Jan;19(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
8
Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format.使用离散选择实验评估QLU-C10D：可行性及对呈现形式的敏感性
Qual Life Res. 2016 Mar;25(3):637-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1115-3. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
9
Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide.医疗保健中离散选择实验的样本量要求：实用指南。
Patient. 2015 Oct;8(5):373-84. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0118-z.
10
Response Patterns in Health State Valuation Using Endogenous Attribute Attendance and Latent Class Analysis.使用内生属性参与度和潜在类别分析的健康状态估值中的反应模式。
Health Econ. 2016 Feb;25(2):212-24. doi: 10.1002/hec.3134. Epub 2014 Dec 17.