Suppr超能文献

利用离散选择实验中的偏好对患者和医生进行分类。

Segmenting patients and physicians using preferences from discrete choice experiments.

作者信息

Deal Ken

机构信息

McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4M4, Canada,

出版信息

Patient. 2014;7(1):5-21. doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0037-9.

Abstract

People often form groups or segments that have similar interests and needs and seek similar benefits from health providers. Health organizations need to understand whether the same health treatments, prevention programs, services, and products should be applied to everyone in the relevant population or whether different treatments need to be provided to each of several segments that are relatively homogeneous internally but heterogeneous among segments. Our objective was to explain the purposes, benefits, and methods of segmentation for health organizations, and to illustrate the process of segmenting health populations based on preference coefficients from a discrete choice conjoint experiment (DCE) using an example study of prevention of cyberbullying among university students. We followed a two-level procedure for investigating segmentation incorporating several methods for forming segments in Level 1 using DCE preference coefficients and testing their quality, reproducibility, and usability by health decision makers. Covariates (demographic, behavioral, lifestyle, and health state variables) were included in Level 2 to further evaluate quality and to support the scoring of large databases and developing typing tools for assigning those in the relevant population, but not in the sample, to the segments. Several segmentation solution candidates were found during the Level 1 analysis, and the relationship of the preference coefficients to the segments was investigated using predictive methods. Those segmentations were tested for their quality and reproducibility and three were found to be very close in quality. While one seemed better than others in the Level 1 analysis, another was very similar in quality and proved ultimately better in predicting segment membership using covariates in Level 2. The two segments in the final solution were profiled for attributes that would support the development and acceptance of cyberbullying prevention programs among university students. Those segments were very different-where one wanted substantial penalties against cyberbullies and were willing to devote time to a prevention program, while the other felt no need to be involved in prevention and wanted only minor penalties. Segmentation recognizes key differences in why patients and physicians prefer different health programs and treatments. A viable segmentation solution may lead to adapting prevention programs and treatments for each targeted segment and/or to educating and communicating to better inform those in each segment of the program/treatment benefits. Segment members' revealed preferences showing behavioral changes provide the ultimate basis for evaluating the segmentation benefits to the health organization.

摘要

人们常常形成具有相似兴趣和需求的群体或细分群体,并从医疗服务提供者那里寻求相似的益处。卫生组织需要了解,相同的医疗治疗、预防项目、服务和产品是否应适用于相关人群中的每一个人,或者是否需要为几个内部相对同质但不同细分群体之间存在异质性的细分群体分别提供不同的治疗。我们的目标是解释卫生组织进行细分的目的、益处和方法,并通过一项关于大学生网络欺凌预防的实例研究,说明基于离散选择联合实验(DCE)的偏好系数对健康人群进行细分的过程。我们遵循了一个两级程序来研究细分,在第1级使用DCE偏好系数采用多种方法形成细分群体,并由卫生决策者测试其质量、可重复性和可用性。第2级纳入了协变量(人口统计学、行为、生活方式和健康状况变量),以进一步评估质量,并支持对大型数据库进行评分以及开发用于将相关人群中未包含在样本中的人分配到各个细分群体的分类工具。在第1级分析中发现了几个细分解决方案候选方案,并使用预测方法研究了偏好系数与细分群体之间的关系。对这些细分进行了质量和可重复性测试,发现有三个在质量上非常接近。虽然在第1级分析中,有一个似乎比其他的更好,但另一个在质量上非常相似,并且最终在使用第2级协变量预测细分群体成员身份方面表现得更好。对最终解决方案中的两个细分群体进行了特征分析,以确定有助于在大学生中开发和接受网络欺凌预防项目的属性。这两个细分群体非常不同——一个希望对网络欺凌者进行严厉惩罚,并愿意投入时间参与预防项目,而另一个则认为无需参与预防,只希望进行轻微惩罚。细分认识到患者和医生偏好不同健康项目和治疗的关键差异。一个可行的细分解决方案可能会导致针对每个目标细分群体调整预防项目和治疗方法,和/或进行教育和沟通,以便更好地向每个细分群体的人宣传项目/治疗的益处。细分群体成员表现出行为变化的显性偏好为评估卫生组织的细分益处提供了最终依据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验