• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国地球物理联合会秋季会议上的发言机会性别不平等。

Gender inequity in speaking opportunities at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting.

机构信息

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, UK.

Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 24;9(1):1358. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03809-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-03809-5
PMID:29692409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5915405/
Abstract

Implicit and explicit biases impede the participation of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematic (STEM) fields. Across career stages, attending conferences and presenting research are ways to spread scientific results, find job opportunities, and gain awards. Here, we present an analysis by gender of the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting speaking opportunities from 2014 to 2016. We find that women were invited and assigned oral presentations less often than men. However, when we control for career stage, we see similar rates between women and men and women sometimes outperform men. At the same time, women elect for poster presentations more than men. Male primary conveners allocate invited abstracts and oral presentations to women less often and below the proportion of women authors. These results highlight the need to provide equal opportunity to women in speaking roles at scientific conferences as part of the overall effort to advance women in STEM.

摘要

隐性和显性偏见阻碍了女性参与科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域。在职业发展的各个阶段,参加会议和展示研究成果是传播科学成果、寻找工作机会和获得奖项的途径。在这里,我们分析了 2014 年至 2016 年美国地球物理联盟秋季会议的演讲机会,按性别进行了划分。我们发现,女性被邀请和分配口头报告的机会比男性少。然而,当我们控制职业阶段时,我们发现女性和男性之间的比例相似,有时女性的表现甚至优于男性。与此同时,女性选择展示海报的比例高于男性。主要召集人男性很少将邀请摘要和口头报告分配给女性,而且比例低于女性作者的比例。这些结果凸显了在科学会议上为女性提供平等的演讲机会的必要性,这是提高 STEM 领域女性地位的整体努力的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1063/5915405/bf64f08cf420/41467_2018_3809_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1063/5915405/d679e7e280e2/41467_2018_3809_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1063/5915405/4a8035499bed/41467_2018_3809_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1063/5915405/bf64f08cf420/41467_2018_3809_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1063/5915405/d679e7e280e2/41467_2018_3809_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1063/5915405/4a8035499bed/41467_2018_3809_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1063/5915405/bf64f08cf420/41467_2018_3809_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender inequity in speaking opportunities at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting.美国地球物理联合会秋季会议上的发言机会性别不平等。
Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 24;9(1):1358. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03809-5.
2
Analysis of Speaking Opportunities by Gender at National Dermatologic Surgery Conferences.分析全国皮肤科外科学会议上的性别发言机会。
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Sep;46(9):1195-1201. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002275.
3
Gender disparity in prestigious speaking roles: A study of 10 years of international conference programming in the field of gambling studies.性别在有声望的演讲角色中的差异:对赌博研究领域 10 年国际会议规划的研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 22;18(6):e0286803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286803. eCollection 2023.
4
Gender equity at scientific events.科学活动中的性别平等。
Evol Lett. 2018 Apr 21;2(3):148-158. doi: 10.1002/evl3.49. eCollection 2018 Jun.
5
Ethnic variation in gender-STEM stereotypes and STEM participation: an intersectional approach.性别与STEM刻板印象及STEM参与度中的种族差异:一种交叉性方法
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2015 Apr;21(2):169-80. doi: 10.1037/a0037944. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
6
Gender differences in conference presentations: a consequence of self-selection?会议报告中的性别差异:是自我选择的结果吗?
PeerJ. 2014 Oct 21;2:e627. doi: 10.7717/peerj.627. eCollection 2014.
7
Gender differences in question-asking at the 2019 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting.2019年美国血液学会年会上提问的性别差异。
Blood Adv. 2020 Nov 10;4(21):5473-5479. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002714.
8
Female peers in small work groups enhance women's motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering.小型工作团队中的女性同龄人会增强女性在工程领域的积极性、言语参与度和职业抱负。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 21;112(16):4988-93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422822112. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
9
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.女性在学术科学界:变化中的风景。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141. doi: 10.1177/1529100614541236.
10
Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.终身收入模式、未来社会保障福利的分配以及养老金改革的影响。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(4):74-98.

引用本文的文献

1
How Can We Make Scientific Events More Inclusive? Insights From Q&A Sessions and Surveys From an International Conference.我们如何使科学活动更具包容性?来自一场国际会议问答环节和调查的见解。
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jul 13;15(7):e71588. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71588. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Women climate scientists are connected, productive, and successful but have shorter careers.女性气候科学家人脉广泛、成果丰硕且成就斐然,但职业生涯较短。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul;122(26):e2506023122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2506023122. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
3
Moving toward gender equity in the cardiology and cardiovascular research workforce in Germany: a report from the German Cardiac Society.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities.顶尖大学研讨会演讲者中的性别差距。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 2;115(1):104-108. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708414115. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
2
Gender Parity Trends for Invited Speakers at Four Prominent Virology Conference Series.四个著名病毒学会议系列特邀演讲者的性别平等趋势
J Virol. 2017 Jul 27;91(16). doi: 10.1128/JVI.00739-17. Print 2017 Aug 15.
3
Journals invite too few women to referee.期刊邀请女性担任审稿人的人数过少。
德国心脏病学和心血管研究领域劳动力队伍中的性别平等进展:德国心脏病学会的一份报告
Eur Heart J Open. 2023 Mar 29;3(2):oead034. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead034. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Why so Few, Still? Challenges to Attracting, Advancing, and Keeping Women Faculty of Color in Academia.为何仍然如此之少?吸引、提升和留住学术界有色人种女性教员面临的挑战。
Front Sociol. 2022 Jan 18;6:792198. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.792198. eCollection 2021.
5
Disparate participation by gender of conference attendants in scientific discussions.会议参加者在科学讨论中性别参与度的差异。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0262639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262639. eCollection 2022.
6
50 Years of Women in Cell Biology: Where have we been? Where are we going?《细胞生物学领域女性从业 50 年:我们从何处来?我们往何处去?》
Mol Biol Cell. 2021 Dec 1;32(22). doi: 10.1091/mbc.E21-04-0186.
7
Gender differences in question-asking at the 2019 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting.2019年美国血液学会年会上提问的性别差异。
Blood Adv. 2020 Nov 10;4(21):5473-5479. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002714.
8
Data-driven selection of conference speakers based on scientific impact to achieve gender parity.基于科学影响力的数据驱动型会议演讲者选择,以实现性别均等。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0220481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220481. eCollection 2019.
9
Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review.解析科学领域的性别生产力差距:一项元分析综述
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):181566. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181566. eCollection 2019 Jun.
10
Public Discussion Affects Question Asking at Academic Conferences.公开讨论影响学术会议上的提问。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Jul 3;105(1):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
Nature. 2017 Jan 25;541(7638):455-457. doi: 10.1038/541455a.
4
Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands.在荷兰,性别因素会影响个人获得研究资金的成功率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 6;112(40):12349-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510159112. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
5
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.女性在学术科学界:变化中的风景。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141. doi: 10.1177/1529100614541236.
6
The matilda effect in science: awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s.科学界的“玛蒂尔达效应”:20 世纪 90 年代至 21 世纪初美国的奖项和奖品。
Soc Stud Sci. 2012 Apr;42(2):307-20. doi: 10.1177/0306312711435830.
7
Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science.了解导致女性在科学界代表性不足的当前原因。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 22;108(8):3157-62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014871108. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
8
How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance.慢性自我认知如何影响(并可能误导)对表现的评估。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jan;84(1):5-17.