• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2019年美国血液学会年会上提问的性别差异。

Gender differences in question-asking at the 2019 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting.

作者信息

Moazzam Saira, Onstad Lynn, O'Leary Heather, Marshall Ariela, Osunkwo Ifeyinwa, Du Emily, Dunn Tamara, Dunlap Julianne, Reed Bill, Luger Selina, Lee Stephanie J

机构信息

Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.

出版信息

Blood Adv. 2020 Nov 10;4(21):5473-5479. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002714.

DOI:10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002714
PMID:33166404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7656936/
Abstract

Attendance at professional conferences is an important component of career development, because conferences are a major forum for presenting new research, interacting with colleagues and networking. An extensive literature documents differences in the professional experiences of women and men, including experiences at professional conferences. We hypothesized that women are less likely than men to ask questions at conferences, thus forgoing opportunities for professional development. To address this issue, we analyzed the question-asking behavior of women and men at the 2019 Annual Meeting and Exposition of the American Society of Hematology. In all, 112 sessions (55% of those eligible) were randomly chosen for coding, yielding data on 577 presentations. Although approximately 50% of moderators and speakers were women, the proportion of questions asked by women was significantly lower compared with the estimated proportion of women attending the conference (23% vs 39%; P < .0001). Women were more likely to ask questions if another woman asked the first question or if the session topic was red cells. These results suggest that although women are represented equally as moderators and speakers, they are less likely to engage in the postpresentation discourse by asking questions. Encouraging women to speak up in professional situations and providing training on question-asking skills can help address this gender gap that potentially contributes to disparities in professional visibility and career advancement for women in hematology.

摘要

参加专业会议是职业发展的重要组成部分,因为会议是展示新研究、与同事互动和建立人际关系的主要平台。大量文献记录了女性和男性在职业经历上的差异,包括在专业会议上的经历。我们假设,在会议上女性比男性提问的可能性更小,从而错失职业发展机会。为解决这一问题,我们分析了2019年美国血液学会年会暨博览会上女性和男性的提问行为。总共随机选择了112场会议(占符合条件会议的55%)进行编码,得到了577场报告的数据。尽管大约50%的主持人和发言人是女性,但与参会女性的估计比例相比,女性提问的比例显著更低(23%对39%;P < 0.0001)。如果有另一位女性首先提问或者会议主题是红细胞,女性更有可能提问。这些结果表明,尽管女性作为主持人和发言人的比例相同,但她们通过提问参与会后讨论的可能性更小。鼓励女性在专业场合发言并提供提问技巧培训有助于解决这一性别差距,这一差距可能导致血液学领域女性在职业知名度和职业晋升方面存在差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd3d/7656936/85eed6ee3bdd/advancesADV2020002714absf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd3d/7656936/85eed6ee3bdd/advancesADV2020002714absf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd3d/7656936/85eed6ee3bdd/advancesADV2020002714absf1.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender differences in question-asking at the 2019 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting.2019年美国血液学会年会上提问的性别差异。
Blood Adv. 2020 Nov 10;4(21):5473-5479. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002714.
2
Gender disparities among speakers at major spine conferences.主要脊柱会议发言者中的性别差异。
Spine J. 2023 Sep 9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.08.024.
3
The Speaker Gender Gap at Critical Care Conferences.重症监护会议中的演讲者性别差距。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):991-996. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003114.
4
Gender Equity at Surgical Conferences: Quantity and Quality.外科会议中的性别平等:数量与质量。
J Surg Res. 2021 Feb;258:100-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.036. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Gender distribution of speakers on panels at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) annual meeting.美国胃肠内镜外科学会(SAGES)年会上各小组发言人的性别分布。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):4140-4147. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07182-2. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
6
Female Representation and Implicit Gender Bias at the 2017 American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Annual Scientific and Tripartite Meeting.2017 年美国结直肠外科学会年度科学会议及三方会议中的女性代表性和隐性性别偏见。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Mar;62(3):357-362. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001274.
7
Gender Representation at Conferences, Executive Boards, and Program Committees in Otolaryngology.耳鼻喉科学会议、执行委员会和项目委员会中的性别代表性。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Feb;131(2):E373-E379. doi: 10.1002/lary.28823. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
M-AAA-nsplaining: Gender bias in questions asked at the American Anthropological Association's Annual Meetings.M-AAA-nsplaining:美国人类学会年会提问中的性别偏见。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):e0207691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207691. eCollection 2019.
9
Current Trends of Women Surgeon Speakers at National Trauma Surgery Conferences: The Trauma House Is Improving.全国创伤外科学术会议上女性外科医生演讲者的当前趋势:创伤之家正在改善。
Am Surg. 2020 Jul;86(7):803-810. doi: 10.1177/0003134820933555. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
10
Panel composition and disparities in the topics of presentation in vascular surgery conferences.会议中血管外科学术演讲的专题呈现:壁报组成和差异。
Vascular. 2024 Jun;32(3):679-684. doi: 10.1177/17085381231154343. Epub 2023 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The American Society of Hematology Health Equity Compendium: examining health equity across the Blood journals.美国血液学会健康公平纲要:审视血液学系列期刊中的健康公平问题
Blood Adv. 2024 Sep 10;8(17):4616-4624. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013633.
2
Gender-based disparities and biases in science: An observational study of a virtual conference.基于性别的科学差异和偏见:一项虚拟会议的观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 7;18(6):e0286811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286811. eCollection 2023.
3
Disparate participation by gender of conference attendants in scientific discussions.

本文引用的文献

1
Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists.新冠疫情对科学家的不平等影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):880-883. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y.
2
Representation of Women Among Invited Speakers at Medical Specialty Conferences.医学专业会议特邀演讲者中的女性代表。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Apr;29(4):550-560. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7723. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
3
Women speakers in healthcare: speaking up for balanced gender representation.医疗保健领域的女性演讲者:为实现性别均衡代表性发声。
会议参加者在科学讨论中性别参与度的差异。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0262639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262639. eCollection 2022.
Future Healthc J. 2019 Oct;6(3):167-171. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2019-0027.
4
Evaluating Unconscious Bias: Speaker Introductions at an International Oncology Conference.评估无意识偏见:国际肿瘤学会议上的演讲者介绍
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 20;37(36):3538-3545. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01608. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
5
Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions.《科学、技术、工程和数学领域中的性别问题:问题、原因、解决方案》
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 11;39(37):7228-7243. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0475-18.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
6
Association of Gender and Parenthood With Conference Attendance Among Early Career Oncologists.早期职业肿瘤学家中性别与为人父母状况与参加会议之间的关联
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;5(10):1503-1504. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1864.
7
Public Discussion Affects Question Asking at Academic Conferences.公开讨论影响学术会议上的提问。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Jul 3;105(1):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
8
Quality at the American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting: Gender Balance Among Invited Speakers and Associations with Panel Success.美国放射肿瘤学会年会上的质量:特邀演讲者中的性别平衡与小组成功的关联。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Aug 1;104(5):987-996. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 11.
9
Trends in the Proportion of Female Speakers at Medical Conferences in the United States and in Canada, 2007 to 2017.美国和加拿大 2007 年至 2017 年医学会议中女性发言者比例的变化趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e192103. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2103.
10
Promoting gender equity in grant making: what can a funder do?在资助决策中促进性别平等:资助者能做些什么?
Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):e9-e11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30211-9.