• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下黏膜下隧道剥离术治疗胃大的肿瘤性病变:一项病例对照研究

Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection for Large Gastric Neoplastic Lesions: A Case-Matched Controlled Study.

作者信息

Feng Xiuxue, Linghu Enqiang, Chai Ningli, Lu Zhongsheng, Wang Xiangdong, Tang Ping, Meng Jiangyun, Du Hong, Wang Hongbin

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018 Mar 6;2018:1419369. doi: 10.1155/2018/1419369. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1155/2018/1419369
PMID:29692806
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5859796/
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) for resection of large superficial gastric lesions (SGLs).

METHODS

The clinicopathological records of patients performed with ESTD or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for SGLs between January 2012 and January 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. 7 cases undergoing ESTD were enrolled to form the ESTD group. The cases were individually matched at a 1 : 1 ratio to other patients performed with ESD according to lesion location, ulcer or scar findings, resected specimen area, operation time and operators, and the matched cases constituting the ESD group. The treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean specimen size was 46 mm. 10 lesions were located in the cardia and 4 lesions in the lesser curvature of the lower gastric body. En bloc resection was achieved for all lesions. The mean ESTD resection time was 69 minutes as against 87.7 minutes for the ESD ( = 0.01). The mean resection speed was faster for ESTD than for ESD (18.86 mm/min versus 13.76 mm/min, = 0.03). There were no significant differences regarding the safety and curability during the endoscopic follow-up (mean 27 months).

CONCLUSIONS

ESTD is effective and safe for the removal of SGLs and appears to be an optimal option for patients with large SGLs at suitable sites.

摘要

目的

评估内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术(ESTD)切除大型浅表性胃病变(SGLs)的疗效和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2014年1月期间接受ESTD或内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗SGLs患者的临床病理记录。纳入7例行ESTD的患者组成ESTD组。根据病变位置、溃疡或瘢痕表现、切除标本面积、手术时间和手术者,将病例按1:1比例与其他行ESD的患者进行个体匹配,匹配病例组成ESD组。比较两组的治疗效果。

结果

标本平均大小为46mm。10处病变位于贲门,4处病变位于胃体下部小弯侧。所有病变均实现整块切除。ESTD平均切除时间为69分钟,而ESD为87.7分钟(P = 0.01)。ESTD的平均切除速度比ESD快(18.86mm/min对13.76mm/min,P = 0.03)。在内镜随访期间(平均27个月),安全性和治愈率方面无显著差异。

结论

ESTD切除SGLs有效且安全,对于合适部位的大型SGLs患者似乎是一个最佳选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8527/5859796/448bbf6a9fff/GRP2018-1419369.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8527/5859796/9b59e31591dc/GRP2018-1419369.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8527/5859796/4ab306ede83f/GRP2018-1419369.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8527/5859796/448bbf6a9fff/GRP2018-1419369.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8527/5859796/9b59e31591dc/GRP2018-1419369.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8527/5859796/4ab306ede83f/GRP2018-1419369.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8527/5859796/448bbf6a9fff/GRP2018-1419369.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection for Large Gastric Neoplastic Lesions: A Case-Matched Controlled Study.内镜下黏膜下隧道剥离术治疗胃大的肿瘤性病变:一项病例对照研究
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018 Mar 6;2018:1419369. doi: 10.1155/2018/1419369. eCollection 2018.
2
Comparison between endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial neoplasia at esophagogastric junction: a case-matched controlled study of a single center from China.内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管胃结合部黏膜下浅层肿瘤的对比:来自中国单中心的病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8371-8378. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09289-5. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
3
A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for large lesser gastric curvature superficial neoplasms.多中心回顾性研究:内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术治疗大型胃小弯侧表浅肿瘤。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jun;33(6):1910-1919. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6471-y. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for early superficial upper gastrointestinal precancerous lesions and tumors: A meta-analysis.内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期表浅上消化道癌前病变及肿瘤的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
J Dig Dis. 2020 Sep;21(9):480-489. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12915.
5
Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗浅表食管肿瘤性病变的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):52-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07925-6. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
6
Prospective randomized comparison of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection and conventional submucosal dissection in the resection of superficial esophageal/gastric lesions in a living porcine model.在活猪模型中,内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术与传统黏膜下剥离术切除浅表食管/胃病变的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2015 Dec;3(6):E577-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393084. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
7
Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for large superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasm: efficacy and safety study to guide future practice.内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗大型食管浅表鳞状细胞癌:指导未来实践的疗效和安全性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2814-2821. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5986-y. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
8
Comparison of Short-Term Efficacy Between Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Treatment of Wide Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Early Stage.内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期宽范围食管鳞状细胞癌的短期疗效比较。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul;54(6):512-516. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001266.
9
Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers: outcomes of 799 consecutive cases in a single institution.内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术与传统内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌:单中心连续 799 例病例的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Dec;34(12):5625-5631. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07849-1. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
10
Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection vs conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal neoplasms: a single-centre retrospective study.内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术与传统内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗大肠巨大肿瘤的单中心回顾性研究
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Apr;27(4):317-323. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02732-8. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Traction Methods on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Efficacy for Gastric Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.牵引方法对内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗胃肿瘤疗效的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Mar;55(1):129-142. doi: 10.1007/s12029-023-00982-9. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
2
Comparison between endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial neoplasia at esophagogastric junction: a case-matched controlled study of a single center from China.内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管胃结合部黏膜下浅层肿瘤的对比:来自中国单中心的病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8371-8378. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09289-5. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术治疗食管浅表鳞癌的疗效及安全性:倾向评分匹配分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Nov;86(5):831-838. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
2
Double Endoscopic Intraluminal Operation (DEILO) for Early Gastric Cancer: Outcome of Novel Procedure for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.早期胃癌的双内镜腔内手术(DEILO):内镜黏膜下剥离术新术式的结果
Anticancer Res. 2017 Jan;37(1):343-347. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11327.
3
Comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer.
Advances in traction methods for endoscopic submucosal dissection: What is the best traction method and traction direction?
内镜黏膜下剥离术牵引方法的研究进展:哪种牵引方法和牵引方向最好?
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 7;28(1):1-22. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i1.1.
4
Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection with ring-thread countertraction for a large gastric tumor with extensive severe fibrosis.采用环形丝线反向牵引的内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术治疗伴有广泛严重纤维化的大型胃肿瘤。
VideoGIE. 2020 Oct 24;6(1):11-13. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2020.09.005. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection as a Novel Therapeutic Technique in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus.内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术作为 Barrett 食管患者的一种新型治疗技术。
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2020 Jan-Dec;8:2324709620941318. doi: 10.1177/2324709620941318.
6
Efficacy of Current Traction Techniques for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.内镜黏膜下剥离术当前牵引技术的疗效。
Gut Liver. 2020 Nov 15;14(6):673-684. doi: 10.5009/gnl19266.
7
Circumferential Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection of Gastric Cardia Adenocarcinoma.贲门腺癌的环形内镜下黏膜下隧道剥离术
ACG Case Rep J. 2019 Mar 2;6(3):1-2. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000000051. eCollection 2019 Mar.
8
Consensus on the digestive endoscopic tunnel technique.消化内镜隧道技术共识。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 21;25(7):744-776. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i7.744.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Nonanesthesiologist-Administrated Propofol during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Epithelial Tumors.非麻醉医生实施丙泊酚用于胃上皮肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术的安全性和有效性
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Jan 10;2019:5937426. doi: 10.1155/2019/5937426. eCollection 2019.
固有肌层起源的胃间质瘤黏膜下隧道内镜切除术与内镜全层切除术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3376-3382. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5350-7. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
4
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a multicenter collaborative study.早期胃癌内镜下黏膜下剥离术的长期疗效:一项多中心合作研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Mar;20(Suppl 1):45-52. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0664-7. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
5
Effectiveness of clip-and-snare method using pre-looping technique for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.使用预圈套技术的套扎-圈套法在胃内镜黏膜下剥离术中的有效性。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun 25;8(12):451-7. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i12.451.
6
Risk factors for local recurrence after en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.早期胃癌整块内镜下黏膜下剥离术后局部复发的危险因素。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Apr 10;8(7):330-7. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i7.330.
7
Thread-Traction with a Sheath of Polypectomy Snare Facilitates Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Gastric Cancers.使用息肉切除圈套器鞘进行丝线牵引有助于早期胃癌的内镜黏膜下剥离术。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:9415497. doi: 10.1155/2016/9415497. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
8
Prospective randomized comparison of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection and conventional submucosal dissection in the resection of superficial esophageal/gastric lesions in a living porcine model.在活猪模型中,内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术与传统黏膜下剥离术切除浅表食管/胃病变的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2015 Dec;3(6):E577-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393084. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
9
Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection with dental floss clip traction for gastric epithelial neoplasia: a pilot study (with video).牙线夹牵引内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗胃上皮性肿瘤的疗效:一项前瞻性研究(附视频)
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):3100-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4580-4. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
10
The pocket-creation method of ESD for gastric neoplasms.用于胃肿瘤的内镜黏膜下剥离术的造袋方法。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb;83(2):457-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.068. Epub 2015 Sep 7.