a School of Rehabilitation Science, Institute for Applied Health Sciences , McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada.
b Hamilton Health Sciences , Acquired Brain Injury Program , Hamilton , Canada.
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Sep;41(19):2343-2349. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1467504. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
In acquired brain injury (ABI) populations, low motivation to engage in rehabilitation is associated with poor rehabilitation outcomes. Motivation in ABI is thought to be influenced by internal and external factors. This is consistent with Self-determination Theory, which posits that motivation is intrinsic and extrinsic. This paper discusses the benefit of using Self-determination Theory to guide measurement of motivation in ABI. Using a narrative review of the Self-determination Theory literature and clinical rehabilitation research, this paper discusses the unique role intrinsic and extrinsic motivation has in healthcare settings and the importance of understanding both when providing rehabilitation in ABI. Based on the extant literature, it is possible that two independently developed measures of motivation for ABI populations, the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Motivation Questionnaire-Self and the Motivation for Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Questionnaire, may assess intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, respectively. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in ABI may be two equally important but independent factors that could provide a comprehensive understanding of motivation in individuals with ABI. This increased understanding could help facilitate behavioural approaches in rehabilitation. Implications for Rehabilitation Conceptualization of motivation in ABI would benefit from drawing upon Self-determination Theory. External factors of motivation such as the therapeutic environment or social support should be carefully considered in rehabilitation in order to increase engagement. Assessing motivation as a dual rather than a global construct may provide more precise information about the extent to which a patient is motivated.
在后天性脑损伤(ABI)人群中,参与康复治疗的动机较低与康复效果不佳有关。ABI 中的动机被认为受到内部和外部因素的影响。这与自我决定理论一致,该理论认为动机是内在的和外在的。本文讨论了使用自我决定理论来指导 ABI 患者动机测量的益处。
本文通过对自我决定理论文献和临床康复研究的叙述性综述,讨论了内在和外在动机在医疗保健环境中的独特作用,以及在提供 ABI 康复治疗时理解这两者的重要性。基于现有文献,ABI 人群中两种独立开发的动机测量工具,即脑损伤康复信托动机问卷-自我和创伤性脑损伤康复动机问卷,可能分别评估内在动机和外在动机。
ABI 中的内在和外在动机可能是两个同等重要但独立的因素,可以全面了解 ABI 患者的动机。这种更深入的理解可以帮助促进康复中的行为方法。
康复的意义
ABI 中的动机概念化应借鉴自我决定理论。在康复中,应仔细考虑动机的外部因素,如治疗环境或社会支持,以提高参与度。将动机评估为双重而非整体结构,可能会提供更精确的信息,了解患者的动机程度。