• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于在阿拉伯联合酋长国运用陈述偏好法生成健康状态值的可行性及文化适宜性的调查。

An Investigation of the Feasibility and Cultural Appropriateness of Stated Preference Methods to Generate Health State Values in the United Arab Emirates.

作者信息

Papadimitropoulos Emmanuel A, Elbarazi Iffat, Blair Iain, Katsaiti Marina-Selini, Shah Koonal K, Devlin Nancy J

机构信息

Eli Lilly Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

UAE University, Al Ain, UAE.

出版信息

Value Health Reg Issues. 2015 Sep;7:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2015.07.002
PMID:29698150
Abstract

BACKGROUND

No five-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) value sets are currently available in the Middle East to inform decision making in the region's health care systems.

OBJECTIVES

To test the feasibility of eliciting EQ-5D-5L values from a general public sample in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) using the EuroQol Group's standardized valuation protocol.

METHODS

Values were elicited in face-to-face computer-assisted personal interviews. Adult Emiratis were recruited in public places. Respondents completed 10 time trade-off tasks and 7 discrete choice experiment tasks, followed by debriefing questions about their experience of completing the valuation tasks. Descriptive analyses were used to assess the face validity of the data.

RESULTS

Two hundred respondents were interviewed in December 2013. The face validity of the data appears to be reasonably high. Mean time trade-off values ranged from 0.81 for the mildest health state (21111) to 0.19 for the worst health state in the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system (55555). Health states were rarely valued as being worse than dead (6.2% of all observations; 10% of all valuations of 55555). In a rationality check discrete choice experiment task whereby a health state (55554) was compared with another that logically dominated it (55211), 99.5% of the respondents chose the dominant option. Most of the respondents stated that their religious beliefs influenced their responses to the valuation tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that it is feasible to generate meaningful health-state values in the UAE, though some adaptation of the methods may be required to improve their acceptability in the UAE (and other countries with predominantly Arab and/or Muslim populations).

摘要

背景

中东地区目前尚无五级欧洲五维健康量表(EQ - 5D - 5L)价值集可用于为该地区医疗保健系统的决策提供信息。

目的

使用欧洲五维健康量表小组的标准化估值方案,测试从阿拉伯联合酋长国(阿联酋)的普通公众样本中获取EQ - 5D - 5L值的可行性。

方法

通过面对面的计算机辅助个人访谈获取价值。在公共场所招募成年阿联酋人。受访者完成10项时间权衡任务和7项离散选择实验任务,随后就他们完成估值任务的体验进行汇报问题。采用描述性分析来评估数据的表面效度。

结果

2013年12月对200名受访者进行了访谈。数据的表面效度似乎相当高。在EQ - 5D - 5L描述系统中,时间权衡值的均值范围从最轻微健康状态(21111)的0.81到最差健康状态(55555)的0.19。健康状态很少被评估为比死亡更糟(占所有观察值的6.2%;55555所有估值的10%)。在一项合理性检查的离散选择实验任务中,将一种健康状态(55554)与另一种逻辑上占优的健康状态(55211)进行比较,99.5%的受访者选择了占优选项。大多数受访者表示他们的宗教信仰影响了他们对估值任务的回答。

结论

我们的结果表明,在阿联酋生成有意义的健康状态值是可行的,不过可能需要对方法进行一些调整,以提高其在阿联酋(以及其他主要为阿拉伯和/或穆斯林人口的国家)的可接受性。

相似文献

1
An Investigation of the Feasibility and Cultural Appropriateness of Stated Preference Methods to Generate Health State Values in the United Arab Emirates.关于在阿拉伯联合酋长国运用陈述偏好法生成健康状态值的可行性及文化适宜性的调查。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2015 Sep;7:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
2
Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study.针对德国人群采用综合时间权衡法对EQ-5D-5L进行估值——一项探索性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Feb 20;15(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0617-9.
3
Valuing Health Using Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods: Does Dimension Order Impact on Health State Values?使用时间权衡法和离散选择实验法评估健康:维度顺序会影响健康状态值吗?
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):210-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.005. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
4
Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report.EQ-5D 价目表重新评估的预备研究:方法报告。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Feb;18(12):vii-xxvi, 1-191. doi: 10.3310/hta18120.
5
Does the Introduction of the Ranking Task in Valuation Studies Improve Data Quality and Reduce Inconsistencies? The Case of the EQ-5D-5L.评估研究中引入排序任务是否能提高数据质量并减少不一致性?以EQ-5D-5L为例。
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):478-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
6
A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol.制定新的国际 EQ-5D-5L 估值议定书的方法学研究方案。
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):445-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.04.002.
7
Test-Retest Reliability of EQ-5D-5L Valuation Techniques: The Composite Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.EQ-5D-5L 估值技术的重测信度:综合时间权衡和离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1243-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
8
Valuing Health State: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Ethiopians.重视健康状况:埃塞俄比亚人的 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2020 Sep;22:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.08.475. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
9
Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off.运用复合时间权衡法比较 EQ-5D-5L 的线上和面对面估值。
Qual Life Res. 2021 May;30(5):1433-1444. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02712-1. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
10
An Empirical Study of Two Alternative Comparators for Use in Time Trade-Off Studies.用于时间权衡研究的两种替代比较器的实证研究。
Value Health. 2016 Jan;19(1):53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
What Makes the Time Tradeoff Tick? A Sociopsychological Explanation.时间权衡的关键是什么?一种社会心理学解释。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Nov;44(8):974-985. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241286477. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Valuation of the EQ-5D-3L in Jordan.约旦EQ-5D-3L量表的估值
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr;26(3):487-501. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01712-z. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
3
Health Economic Publications From the Middle East and North Africa Region: A Scoping Review of the Volume and Methods of Research.中东和北非地区的卫生经济出版物:研究数量与方法的范围综述
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2020 Jun 8;3(2):44-54. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-4. eCollection 2020 May.
4
Conceptual Framework for Optimised Proxy Value Set Selection Through Supra-National Value Set Development for the EQ-5D Instruments.通过超国家 EQ-5D 工具值集开发优化代理值集选择的概念框架。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(12):1221-1234. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01194-y. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
5
Preference for shared decision-making among Arabic-speaking people with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study.阿拉伯语慢性病患者对共同决策的偏好:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 11;12(4):e058084. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058084.
6
EQ-VT protocol: one-size-fits-all? Challenges and innovative adaptations used in Egypt: a cross-sectional study.EQ-VT 方案:一刀切?埃及的挑战和创新适应:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 23;11(12):e051727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051727.
7
COVID-19 confinement and related well being measurement using the EQ-5D questionnaire: A survey among the Palestinian population.COVID-19 封控和使用 EQ-5D 问卷进行相关幸福感测量:在巴勒斯坦人群中的一项调查。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;75(10):e14621. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14621. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
8
Application of the EQ-5D in the Middle East: A Systematic Review Focusing on Patients Living in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.EQ-5D在中东地区的应用:一项聚焦于沙特阿拉伯王国患者的系统评价
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 May 12;14:1101-1106. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S306703. eCollection 2021.
9
Examining the Feasibility and Acceptability of Valuing the Arabic Version of SF-6D in a Lebanese Population.评估黎巴嫩人群中 SF-6D 阿拉伯语版本的可行性和可接受性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 6;17(3):1037. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031037.
10
Cultural Values: Can They Explain Differences in Health Utilities between Countries?文化价值观:它们能否解释国家间健康效用的差异?
Med Decis Making. 2019 Jul;39(5):605-616. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19841587. Epub 2019 Jul 1.