• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

花生口服免疫治疗的长期疗效-真实世界经验。

Long-term outcome of peanut oral immunotherapy-Real-life experience.

机构信息

Institute of Allergy, Immunology and Pediatric Pulmonology, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.

Department of Pediatrics, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018 Aug;29(5):519-526. doi: 10.1111/pai.12914. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1111/pai.12914
PMID:29698554
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is currently recommended as a treatment option for peanut-allergic patients. Data regarding its long-term compliance and efficacy in real life are required.

METHODS

Peanut-allergic patients aged ≥4 years were enrolled in a single-center clinical OIT program. Buildup to 3000 mg peanut protein was performed. Patients reaching this dose before or after 12/2014 were instructed to consume 3000 or 1200 mg daily, respectively. Patients were followed ≥6 months after reaching maintenance and rechallenged to 3000 mg.

RESULTS

Of the 145 patients studied, 113 (77.9%) were fully desensitized to 3000 mg and 133 (91.7%) were desensitized to ≥300 mg. 21/145 patients (14.5%) required adrenaline for home-dose reactions during buildup. Non-anaphylactic gastrointestinal symptoms, experienced by 9 patients (6.2%), reversed with dose reduction. Of the 111 patients available for analysis 6 months after reaching 3000 mg, 97 (87.4%) continued regular peanut consumption. Only 2/111 patients (1.8%) required adrenaline over the long-term (median, range; 18, 6-75 months) follow-up. Adherence to treatment was significantly higher in patients consuming 1200 mg (73/76, 96.1%) vs those consuming 3000 mg (24/35, 72.2%), (P = .001). A higher maintenance dosage and home adrenaline requirement during buildup predicted adherence cessation (OR 12.5, P = .001; and OR 7.8, P = .02, respectively). 63/64 patients (98.4%) consuming 1200 mg maintenance dose were successfully rechallenged to 3000 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-life experience demonstrates the efficacy of peanut OIT long-term. A lower maintenance dose minimized treatment cessation while maintaining desensitization. OIT should be performed in qualified centers given the prevalence of adverse reactions, particularly during buildup.

摘要

背景

目前推荐口服免疫疗法(OIT)作为花生过敏患者的治疗选择。需要有关其在现实生活中的长期依从性和疗效的数据。

方法

纳入了年龄≥4 岁的花生过敏患者参加单中心临床 OIT 项目。进行 3000mg 花生蛋白递增量。在 2014 年 12 月之前或之后达到此剂量的患者分别接受 3000mg 或 1200mg 的每日剂量。在达到维持剂量后至少随访 6 个月,并重新挑战 3000mg。

结果

在研究的 145 名患者中,113 名(77.9%)对 3000mg 完全脱敏,133 名(91.7%)对≥300mg 脱敏。在增量期间,21/145 名患者(14.5%)因家庭剂量反应需要肾上腺素。9 名患者(6.2%)经历了非过敏性胃肠道症状,通过减少剂量逆转。在达到 3000mg 后 6 个月可分析的 111 名患者中,97 名(87.4%)继续定期食用花生。在长期(中位数,范围;18、6-75 个月)随访中,仅 2/111 名患者(1.8%)需要肾上腺素。服用 1200mg 的患者治疗依从性明显更高(76/76,96.1%),而服用 3000mg 的患者(35/35,72.2%),(P=.001)。增量期间维持剂量较高和家庭使用肾上腺素需要预测停药(OR 12.5,P=.001;和 OR 7.8,P=.02)。63/64 名(98.4%)服用 1200mg 维持剂量的患者成功重新挑战 3000mg。

结论

这项真实生活经验证明了花生 OIT 的长期疗效。较低的维持剂量在保持脱敏的同时最大限度地减少了治疗的中断。鉴于不良反应的普遍性,特别是在增量期间,OIT 应在合格的中心进行。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcome of peanut oral immunotherapy-Real-life experience.花生口服免疫治疗的长期疗效-真实世界经验。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018 Aug;29(5):519-526. doi: 10.1111/pai.12914. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
2
Allergen-specific oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy.针对花生过敏的过敏原特异性口服免疫疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD009014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009014.pub2.
3
Low-dose oral immunotherapy for children with anaphylactic peanut allergy in Japan.日本儿童过敏性花生过敏的低剂量口服免疫治疗。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018 Aug;29(5):512-518. doi: 10.1111/pai.12898. Epub 2018 May 10.
4
Feasibility of desensitizing children highly allergic to peanut by high-dose oral immunotherapy.通过高剂量口服免疫疗法使对花生高度过敏的儿童脱敏的可行性。
Allergy. 2019 Feb;74(2):337-348. doi: 10.1111/all.13604. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
5
Probiotic peanut oral immunotherapy versus oral immunotherapy and placebo in children with peanut allergy in Australia (PPOIT-003): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2b trial.益生菌花生口服免疫治疗与口服免疫治疗和安慰剂在澳大利亚花生过敏儿童中的比较(PPOIT-003):一项多中心、随机、2b 期试验。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 Mar;6(3):171-184. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00006-2. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
6
Peanut oral immunotherapy using an extensively heated and baked novel composition of peanuts.花生口服免疫治疗采用一种经过充分加热和烘焙的新型花生组合物。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2024 May;35(5):e14146. doi: 10.1111/pai.14146.
7
Two-year post-treatment outcomes following peanut oral immunotherapy in the Probiotic and Peanut Oral Immunotherapy-003 Long-Term (PPOIT-003LT) study.Probiotic 和花生口服免疫治疗-003 长期(PPOIT-003LT)研究中花生口服免疫治疗后的两年治疗结果。
Allergy. 2024 Oct;79(10):2759-2774. doi: 10.1111/all.16262. Epub 2024 Aug 4.
8
High Degree of Desensitization After 1 Year of Early-Life Peanut Oral Immunotherapy: Small Children Oral Immunotherapy (SmaChO) Randomized Controlled Trial.早期生活花生口服免疫治疗 1 年后高度脱敏:小儿口服免疫治疗(SmaChO)随机对照试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 May;12(5):1297-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.02.030. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
9
Peanut oral immunotherapy in a pediatric allergy clinic: Patient factors associated with clinical outcomes.儿科过敏诊所中的花生口服免疫疗法:与临床结果相关的患者因素。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Aug;127(2):214-222.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
10
Parent and child perception of quality of life in a randomized controlled peanut oral immunotherapy trial.家长和儿童对随机对照花生口服免疫治疗试验中生活质量的感知。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019 Sep;30(6):638-645. doi: 10.1111/pai.13066. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral Immunotherapy Should Play a Key Role in Preschool Food Allergy Management.口服免疫疗法应在学龄前儿童食物过敏管理中发挥关键作用。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2025 Apr;55(4):294-306. doi: 10.1111/cea.70013. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
2
Real-world experience: a retrospective pediatric chart review to determine why patients and caregivers discontinue oral immunotherapy.真实世界经验:一项回顾性儿科病历审查,以确定患者和护理人员停止口服免疫疗法的原因。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2024 Oct 15;20(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00912-9.
3
Oral immunotherapy improves the quality of life of adults with food allergy.
口服免疫疗法可改善食物过敏成人的生活质量。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2024 Oct 14;20(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00915-6.
4
Psychosocial Impact of Food Allergy on Children and Adults and Practical Interventions.食物过敏对儿童和成人的心理社会影响及实用干预措施。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024 Mar;24(3):107-119. doi: 10.1007/s11882-023-01121-x. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
5
Eosinophil-Associated Gastrointestinal Manifestations During OIT.食物过敏免疫治疗过程中与嗜酸性粒细胞相关的胃肠道表现。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2023 Dec;65(3):365-376. doi: 10.1007/s12016-023-08974-0. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
6
Immune signatures predicting the clinical outcome of peanut oral immunotherapy: where we stand.预测花生口服免疫疗法临床结果的免疫特征:现状
Front Allergy. 2023 Oct 2;4:1270344. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1270344. eCollection 2023.
7
Optimal period for achieving sustained unresponsiveness in peanut oral immunotherapy.花生口服免疫疗法中实现持续无反应的最佳时期。
Asia Pac Allergy. 2023 Sep;13(3):97-104. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000110. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
8
Oral immunotherapy for food allergy: Translation from studies to clinical practice?食物过敏的口服免疫疗法:从研究到临床实践的转化?
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Feb 3;16(2):100747. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100747. eCollection 2023 Feb.
9
Biomarkers in oral immunotherapy.口腔免疫治疗中的生物标志物。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2022;23(9):705-731. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2200047.
10
Transitioning peanut oral immunotherapy to clinical practice.将花生口服免疫疗法应用于临床实践。
Front Allergy. 2022 Aug 26;3:974250. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.974250. eCollection 2022.