Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Jul;106:71-85. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
It is not clear if treatments for depression targeting repetitive negative thinking (RNT: rumination, worry and content-independent perseverative thinking) have a specific effect on RNT resulting in better outcomes than treatments that do not specifically target rumination. We conducted a systematic search of PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library for randomized trials in adolescents, adults and older adults comparing CBT treatments for (previous) depression with control groups or with other treatments and reporting outcomes on RNT. Inclusion criteria were met by 36 studies with a total of 3307 participants. At post-test we found a medium-sized effect of any treatment compared to control groups on RNT (g = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.37-0.59). Rumination-focused CBT: g = 0.76, <0.01; Cognitive Control Training: g = 0.62, p < .01; CBT: g = 0.57, p < .01; Concreteness training: g = 0.53, p < .05; and Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy: g = 0.42, p < .05 had medium sized and significantly larger effect sizes than other types of treatment (i.e., anti-depressant medication, light therapy, engagement counseling, life review, expressive writing, yoga) (g = 0.14) compared to control groups. Effects on RNT at post-test were strongly associated with the effects on depression severity and this association was only significant in RNT-focused CBT. Our results suggest that in particular RNT-focused CBT may have a more pronounced effect on RNT than other types of interventions. Further mediation and mechanistic studies to test the predictive value of reductions in RNT following RNT-focused CBT for subsequent depression outcomes are called for.
目前尚不清楚针对重复消极思维(RNT:沉思、担忧和与内容无关的持续思维)的抑郁症治疗方法是否对 RNT 有特定的影响,从而导致比不专门针对沉思的治疗方法更好的结果。我们系统地搜索了 PsycINFO、PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆,以寻找比较认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗(既往)抑郁症与对照组或其他治疗方法的随机试验,并报告 RNT 的结果。36 项研究符合纳入标准,共有 3307 名参与者。在测试后,我们发现任何治疗方法与对照组相比,在 RNT 上的效果都有中等大小的差异(g=0.48;95%置信区间:0.37-0.59)。针对沉思的 CBT:g=0.76,<0.01;认知控制训练:g=0.62,p<0.01;CBT:g=0.57,p<0.01;具体化训练:g=0.53,p<0.05;正念认知疗法:g=0.42,p<0.05,与其他类型的治疗方法(即抗抑郁药物、光疗、参与咨询、生活回顾、表达性写作、瑜伽)相比,具有更大的中等大小的效果(g=0.14)与对照组相比。RNT 测试后的效果与抑郁严重程度的效果密切相关,而这种关联仅在 RNT 聚焦的 CBT 中显著。我们的研究结果表明,特别是 RNT 聚焦的 CBT 可能对 RNT 有更显著的影响,而其他类型的干预措施则不然。需要进一步进行中介和机制研究,以测试 RNT 聚焦的 CBT 后 RNT 减少对随后的抑郁结果的预测价值。