Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; The Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
The Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Jul;13(7):915-925. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
The survival of patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer has dramatically improved since the introduction of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Recently, osimertinib showed significantly prolonged progression-free survival than first-generation EGFR-TKI in first-line treatment, suggesting that a paradigm change that would move osimetinib to first-line treatment is indicated. We performed N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis screening to uncover the resistant mechanism in first- and second-line osimertinib treatment.
Ba/F3 cells harboring EGFR activating-mutation with or without secondary resistant mutation were exposed to ENU for 24 hours to introduce random mutations and selected with gefitinib, afatinib, or osimertinib. Mutations of emerging resistant cells were assessed.
The resistance of T790M and C797S to gefitinib and osimertinib, respectively, was prevalent in the mutagenesis screening with the Ba/F3 cells harboring activating-mutation alone. From C797S/activating-mutation expressing Ba/F3, the additional T790M was a major resistant mechanism in gefitinib and afatinib selection and the additional T854A and L792H were minor resistance mechanisms only in afatinib selection. However, the additional T854A or L792H mediated resistance to all classes of EGFR-TKI. Surprisingly, no resistant clone due to secondary mutation emerged from activating-mutation alone in the gefitinib + osimertinib selection.
We showed the resistance mechanism to EGFR-TKI focusing on first- and second-line osimertinib using ENU mutagenesis screening. Additional T854A and L792H on C797S/activating-mutation were found as afatinib resistance and not as gefitinib resistance. Thus, compared to afatinib, the first-generation EGFR-TKI might be preferable as second-line treatment to C797S/activating-mutation emerging after first-line osimertinib treatment.
自从引入表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)以来,携带 EGFR 突变阳性的肺癌患者的生存时间显著延长。最近,奥希替尼在一线治疗中表现出比第一代 EGFR-TKI 显著延长的无进展生存期,这表明需要将奥希替尼移至一线治疗,从而改变治疗模式。我们进行了 N-乙基-N-亚硝基脲(ENU)诱变筛选,以揭示一线和二线奥希替尼治疗中的耐药机制。
将携带 EGFR 激活突变的 Ba/F3 细胞暴露于 ENU 中 24 小时,以引入随机突变,并使用吉非替尼、阿法替尼或奥希替尼进行选择。评估新出现的耐药细胞的突变情况。
在单独携带激活突变的 Ba/F3 细胞的诱变筛选中,T790M 和 C797S 对吉非替尼和奥希替尼的耐药性分别很常见。从 C797S/激活突变表达的 Ba/F3 中,在吉非替尼和阿法替尼选择中,T790M 是主要的耐药机制,而 T854A 和 L792H 仅在阿法替尼选择中是次要的耐药机制。然而,T854A 或 L792H 介导了对所有类型的 EGFR-TKI 的耐药性。令人惊讶的是,在吉非替尼+奥希替尼选择中,仅携带激活突变的细胞没有出现继发性突变的耐药克隆。
我们使用 ENU 诱变筛选,针对一线和二线奥希替尼,展示了针对 EGFR-TKI 的耐药机制。在 C797S/激活突变上发现了额外的 T854A 和 L792H,它们是阿法替尼耐药,而不是吉非替尼耐药。因此,与阿法替尼相比,第一代 EGFR-TKI 可能更适合作为一线奥希替尼治疗后出现 C797S/激活突变的二线治疗药物。