• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国天津抗感染药物支出增加:一项分解分析

Increasing Anti-Infective Drug Expenditure in Tianjin, China: A Decomposition Analysis.

作者信息

Wu Jing, Yue Ning, Xu Weiwei

机构信息

School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Value Health Reg Issues. 2013 May;2(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2013.01.002
PMID:29702850
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the driving factors of the increasing anti-infective drug expenditures in Tianjin, China, and to provide evidence-based suggestions for policymakers.

METHODS

Data were extracted from inpatient records in Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance data of Tianjin, China, from 2003 January to December 2007. Expenditure increase for a basket of 63 constantly used anti-infective drugs was decomposed into three broad categories: price effects, quantity effects, and therapeutic choices. Furthermore, the injection anti-infective drug expenditures from 2006 to 2007 were decomposed into six determinants.

RESULTS

From 2003 January to December 2007, the expenditure for a fixed basket of drugs increased by 9%. The driving factors were therapeutic choices and quantity effects; each increased 48% and 10%, respectively. The relative price decreased by 33% during the study period. After adding new drugs to the formulary in 2005, the rate of increase in drug expenditure was 28% from 2006 to 2007; the driving factors were still therapeutic choice (16.8%) and quantity effects (14.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic choice transferring from cheap drugs to expensive ones, rather than the price, was the main driving factor for increasing expenditures. Policymakers need to pay more attention to rationalize physicians' prescribing behavior to control the expenditure.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨中国天津抗感染药物支出增加的驱动因素,并为政策制定者提供循证建议。

方法

数据取自中国天津城镇职工基本医疗保险数据2003年1月至2007年12月的住院记录。63种常用抗感染药物的篮子支出增长被分解为三大类:价格效应、数量效应和治疗选择。此外,2006年至2007年的注射用抗感染药物支出被分解为六个决定因素。

结果

2003年1月至2007年12月,一篮子固定药物的支出增长了9%。驱动因素是治疗选择和数量效应;分别增长了48%和10%。研究期间相对价格下降了33%。2005年将新药纳入处方集后,2006年至2007年药物支出增长率为28%;驱动因素仍然是治疗选择(16.8%)和数量效应(14.9%)。

结论

治疗选择从廉价药物转向昂贵药物,而非价格,是支出增加的主要驱动因素。政策制定者需要更加关注使医生的处方行为合理化以控制支出。

相似文献

1
Increasing Anti-Infective Drug Expenditure in Tianjin, China: A Decomposition Analysis.中国天津抗感染药物支出增加:一项分解分析
Value Health Reg Issues. 2013 May;2(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
2
The impact of China's retail drug price control policy on hospital expenditures: a case study in two Shandong hospitals.中国零售药品价格管制政策对医院支出的影响:以山东两家医院为例的研究
Health Policy Plan. 2005 May;20(3):185-96. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czi018.
3
Does the leading pharmaceutical reform in China really solve the issue of overly expensive healthcare services? Evidence from an empirical study.中国领先的医药改革真的解决了医疗服务费用过高的问题吗?一项实证研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 16;13(1):e0190320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190320. eCollection 2018.
4
The impotence of price controls: failed attempts to constrain pharmaceutical expenditures in Greece.价格管制的无效性:希腊控制药品支出的失败尝试。
Health Policy. 2011 Jul;101(2):162-71. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.023. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
5
Key Components of Increased Drug Expenditure in South Korea: Implications for the Future.韩国药品支出增加的关键因素:对未来的启示。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2015 May;6:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
6
Can price controls reduce pharmaceutical expenses? A case study of antibacterial expenditures in 12 Chinese hospitals from 1996 to 2005.价格管制能否降低药品费用?以 1996 年至 2005 年中国 12 家医院的抗菌药物支出为例。
Int J Health Serv. 2013;43(1):91-103. doi: 10.2190/HS.43.1.g.
7
The power of r - pharmaceutical sales decomposition in Cyprus public healthcare sector and determinants of drug expenditure evolution: any lessons learned?塞浦路斯公共医疗保健部门药品销售分解的影响因素及药品支出演变的决定因素:有哪些经验教训?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Apr;14(2):289-300. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.889565. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
8
The Impact of China's National Essential Medicine Policy and Its Implications for Urban Outpatients: A Multivariate Difference-in-Differences Study.中国国家基本药物政策的影响及其对城市门诊患者的启示:一项多变量双重差分研究
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):412-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.018. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
9
Determinants and Equity Evaluation for Health Expenditure Among Patients with Rare Diseases in China.中国罕见病患者医疗支出的决定因素及公平性评估
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Jun 20;129(12):1387-93. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.183425.
10
Impacts of regulated competition on pricing in Chinese pharmaceutical market under urban employee basic medical insurance.城镇职工基本医疗保险下规制竞争对中国药品市场定价的影响
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Jun;17(3):311-320. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1251318. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Main drivers of diabetes pharmaceuticals expenditures: evidence from OECD countries and Iran.糖尿病药物支出的主要驱动因素:来自经合组织国家和伊朗的证据。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):431-442. doi: 10.1007/s40200-022-01161-6. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Decomposition Analysis of Spending and Price Trends for Biologic Antirheumatic Drugs in Medicare and Medicaid.医疗保险和医疗补助中生物类抗风湿药物的支出和价格趋势分解分析。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Feb;72(2):234-241. doi: 10.1002/art.41138. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
3
Pharmaceutical innovation: impact on expenditure and outcomes and subsequent challenges for pharmaceutical policy, with a special reference to Greece.
药物创新:对支出和结果的影响以及药物政策随后面临的挑战,特别提及希腊
Hippokratia. 2014 Apr;18(2):100-6.