• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子宫内膜癌腹腔镜手术、开腹手术及腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术手术时间与并发症比较的网状Meta分析

A network meta-analysis of comparison of operative time and complications of laparoscopy, laparotomy, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial carcinoma.

作者信息

Wang Ya-Ru, Lu Hui-Fang, Huo Hui-Can, Qu Chang-Ping, Sun Gui-Xia, Shao Shi-Qing

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(17):e0474. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010474.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000010474
PMID:29703003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5944470/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most frequently occurring female genital cancer. The authors performed this network meta-analysis to compare operative time and the incidence of bowel injury and wound infection of 3 operative approaches (laparoscopy, laparotomy, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy [LAVH]) in the treatment of EC.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for EC from the day of databases establishment to February 2017 were included. Direct and indirect evidences were combined to calculate the combined weighted mean difference (WMD) or odd ratio values and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of 3 operative approaches in the treatment of EC.

RESULTS

A total of 9 qualified RCTs were included into the study. The results showed that laparotomy had a shorter-operative time than LAVH (WMD = -40.36, 95% confidence interval = -75.03 to -2.57). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of bowel injury and wound infection among 3 operative approaches. Besides, the SUCRA values indicated that laparotomy had the shortest operative time but the incidence of bowel injury and wound infection was relatively higher.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study indicate that laparotomy had highest incidence of bowel injury and wound infection but shortest operative time among 3 operative approaches in the treatment of EC.

摘要

背景

子宫内膜癌(EC)是最常见的女性生殖系统癌症。作者进行了这项网状Meta分析,以比较3种手术方式(腹腔镜手术、开腹手术和腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术[LAVH])治疗EC时的手术时间、肠损伤发生率和伤口感染发生率。

方法

检索Cochrane图书馆、PubMed和Embase数据库。纳入自建库之日至2017年2月的EC随机对照试验(RCT)。合并直接和间接证据,计算3种手术方式治疗EC的合并加权均数差(WMD)或比值比以及累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)值。

结果

共纳入9项合格的RCT。结果显示,开腹手术的手术时间比LAVH短(WMD = -40.36,95%置信区间 = -75.03至-2.57)。然而,3种手术方式的肠损伤发生率和伤口感染发生率无显著差异。此外,SUCRA值表明,开腹手术的手术时间最短,但肠损伤发生率和伤口感染发生率相对较高。

结论

本研究结果表明,在治疗EC的3种手术方式中,开腹手术的肠损伤发生率和伤口感染发生率最高,但手术时间最短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5210/5944470/86501e26b1c3/medi-97-e0474-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5210/5944470/fb77e2dbdfa8/medi-97-e0474-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5210/5944470/f8bb4725f98a/medi-97-e0474-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5210/5944470/627b635e684f/medi-97-e0474-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5210/5944470/ac090a49c1a5/medi-97-e0474-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5210/5944470/86501e26b1c3/medi-97-e0474-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5210/5944470/fb77e2dbdfa8/medi-97-e0474-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5210/5944470/f8bb4725f98a/medi-97-e0474-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5210/5944470/627b635e684f/medi-97-e0474-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5210/5944470/ac090a49c1a5/medi-97-e0474-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5210/5944470/86501e26b1c3/medi-97-e0474-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
A network meta-analysis of comparison of operative time and complications of laparoscopy, laparotomy, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial carcinoma.子宫内膜癌腹腔镜手术、开腹手术及腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术手术时间与并发症比较的网状Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(17):e0474. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010474.
2
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD006655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub2.
3
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
4
Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids.子宫肌瘤的微创手术技术与开腹子宫肌瘤切除术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 21;2014(10):CD004638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004638.pub3.
5
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub2.
6
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub3.
7
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病的子宫切除术手术入路。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6.
8
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)与全子宫切除术(TAH)治疗子宫内膜癌的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 May;20(4):570-5. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d8b105.
9
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.全腹腔镜子宫切除术与经阴道子宫切除术:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Feb;24(2):206-217.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
10
Antibiotic prophylaxis for elective hysterectomy.择期子宫切除术的抗生素预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 18;6(6):CD004637. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004637.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Different surgical methods of hysterectomy for the management of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.子宫内膜癌治疗中子宫切除术的不同手术方法:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 15;14:1524991. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1524991. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluating Laparoscopic Skills: Report on the Origami Crane Folding Competition Using Laparoscopic Instruments With Objective Criteria.评估腹腔镜技能:关于使用腹腔镜器械并依据客观标准进行的折纸鹤比赛的报告。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 21;16(10):e72014. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72014. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Pain after laparoscopic endometriosis-specific vs. hysterectomy surgeries: A retrospective cohort analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The Laparoscopic-Assisted Combined Hysterectomy: A New Surgical Concept Compared to the Classical Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy by a Prospective Study.腹腔镜辅助联合子宫切除术:一项前瞻性研究与经典腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术对比的新手术概念
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2017;82(3):223-229. doi: 10.1159/000447592. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
2
[COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASES AND LESIONS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM].腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与阴式子宫切除术治疗女性生殖系统良性疾病及病变的比较
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2016;55 Suppl 1 Pt 1:4-10.
3
Laparoscopic and robot-assisted hysterectomy for uterine cancer: a comparison of costs and complications.
腹腔镜子宫内膜异位症特异性手术与子宫切除术术后疼痛:回顾性队列分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 4;19(10):e0301074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301074. eCollection 2024.
4
A meta-analysis of the risk factors of surgical site infection after hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌子宫切除术后手术部位感染危险因素的荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct 13;21(2). doi: 10.1111/iwj.14420.
5
Predictive factors of surgical site infection after hysterectomy for endometrial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.子宫内膜癌子宫切除术术后手术部位感染的预测因素:回顾性分析。
BMC Surg. 2021 Jun 14;21(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01264-6.
腹腔镜和机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗子宫癌:成本和并发症比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;213(5):665.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
4
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of three treatments in old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.三种治疗方法对老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效及耐受性比较:网状Meta分析与系统评价
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0123153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123153. eCollection 2015.
5
Systematic review with network meta-analysis: the comparative effectiveness and safety of interventions in patients with overt hepatic encephalopathy.系统评价与网络荟萃分析:显性肝性脑病患者干预措施的比较效果和安全性。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Apr;41(7):624-35. doi: 10.1111/apt.13122. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
6
Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA.STATA 中的网络荟萃分析图形工具。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 3;8(10):e76654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076654. eCollection 2013.
7
Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for management of endometrial carcinoma: a prospective randomized study with 11-year experience.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的比较:一项具有 11 年经验的前瞻性随机研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov;139(11):1853-9. doi: 10.1007/s00432-013-1504-3. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
8
Cancer statistics, 2013.癌症统计数据,2013 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jan;63(1):11-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
9
Pain outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer and bone metastases: results from a randomized, double-blind study of denosumab and zoledronic acid.晚期乳腺癌伴骨转移患者的疼痛结局:地舒单抗和唑来膦酸的随机、双盲研究结果。
Cancer. 2013 Feb 15;119(4):832-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27789. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
10
The EMT signaling pathways in endometrial carcinoma.子宫内膜癌中的 EMT 信号通路。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2012 Oct;14(10):715-20. doi: 10.1007/s12094-012-0866-3. Epub 2012 Aug 22.