• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区心理健康研究中的焦点小组:适应的必要性。

Focus Group in Community Mental Health Research: Need for Adaption.

机构信息

Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia, Štefanova 5, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Kardeljeva ploščad 5, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2019 Jan;55(1):168-179. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0271-7. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-018-0271-7
PMID:29704087
Abstract

The article presents an analysis of the use of focus groups in researching community mental health users, starting with the reasons for using them, their implementation in mental health service users' research, and the adaptations of focus group use when researching the experiences of users. Based on personal research experience and a review of scientific publications in the Google Scholar, Web of Science, ProQuest, EBSCOhost, and Scopus databases, 20 articles published between 2010 and 2016 were selected for targeted content analysis. A checklist for reporting on the use of focus groups with community mental health service users, aiming to improve the comparability, verifiability and validity was developed. Adaptations of the implementation of focus groups in relation to participants' characteristics were suggested. Focus groups are not only useful as a scientific research technique, but also for ensuring service users' participation in decision-making in community mental health and evaluating the quality of the mental health system and services .

摘要

本文对使用焦点小组研究社区心理健康服务使用者的情况进行了分析,首先介绍了使用焦点小组的原因,它们在精神健康服务使用者研究中的实施情况,以及在研究使用者的经验时对焦点小组使用的调整。基于个人研究经验以及对谷歌学术、Web of Science、ProQuest、EBSCOhost 和 Scopus 数据库中的科学出版物的回顾,选择了 20 篇 2010 年至 2016 年间发表的文章进行针对性的内容分析。制定了一份报告使用焦点小组对社区心理健康服务使用者的检查表,旨在提高可比性、可验证性和有效性。还提出了与参与者特征相关的焦点小组实施调整。焦点小组不仅是一种有用的科学研究技术,还有助于确保社区心理健康服务使用者参与决策以及评估精神卫生系统和服务的质量。

相似文献

1
Focus Group in Community Mental Health Research: Need for Adaption.社区心理健康研究中的焦点小组:适应的必要性。
Community Ment Health J. 2019 Jan;55(1):168-179. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0271-7. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
2
User participation in community mental health services: exploring the experiences of users and professionals.用户参与社区心理健康服务:探索用户与专业人员的体验
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Dec;23(4):674-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00660.x. Epub 2009 Oct 4.
3
Shifting Practices Toward Recovery-Oriented Care Through an E-Recovery Portal in Community Mental Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study.通过社区精神卫生保健中的电子康复门户将实践转向以康复为导向的护理:一项混合方法探索性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 2;19(5):e145. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7524.
4
Service users' experiences of participation in decision making in mental health services.服务使用者参与精神卫生服务决策的体验。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Nov;22(9):688-97. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12246. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
5
Improving mental health service users' with medical co-morbidity transition between tertiary medical hospital and primary care services: a qualitative study.改善患有合并症的精神卫生服务使用者在三级医院和基层医疗服务之间的转诊:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 26;16:302. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1567-3.
6
'When you haven't got much of a voice': an evaluation of the quality of Independent Mental Health Advocate (IMHA) services in England.“当你几乎没有发言权时”:对英格兰独立心理健康倡导者(IMHA)服务质量的评估
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 May;23(3):313-24. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12153. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
7
Experience and meaning of user involvement: some explorations from a community mental health project.用户参与的经验与意义:来自一个社区心理健康项目的一些探索
Health Soc Care Community. 2002 May;10(3):136-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2002.00351.x.
8
"This is not a Life Anyone would want"-A Qualitative Study of Norwegian ACT Service users' Experience with Mental Health Treatment.“这并非任何人想要的生活”——一项关于挪威积极社区治疗(ACT)服务使用者心理健康治疗体验的定性研究
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Jun;39(6):519-526. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2017.1413459. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
9
Service users' views regarding user involvement in mental health services: A qualitative study.服务使用者对用户参与心理健康服务的看法:一项定性研究。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018 Oct;32(5):695-701. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
10

引用本文的文献

1
A mixed-methods study of adaption challenges and social networks of older urban relocators in China.一项关于中国城市老年搬迁者适应挑战与社会网络的混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 22;25(1):1881. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23095-3.
2
Assistance to families of children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Perceptions of the multiprofessional team.自闭症谱系障碍儿童家庭援助:多专业团队的看法。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2023 Jan-Dec;31:e3780. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.5694.3780.
3
Challenges in detecting and managing mild cognitive impairment in primary care: a focus group study in Shanghai, China.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of non-governmental organizations in the mental health area: differences in understanding.非政府组织在心理健康领域的作用:理解上的差异。
Zdr Varst. 2016 Jul 28;55(4):231-238. doi: 10.1515/sjph-2016-0032. eCollection 2016 Dec 1.
2
Evaluating and Quantifying User and Carer Involvement in Mental Health Care Planning (EQUIP): Co-Development of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure.评估与量化用户及护理人员在精神卫生保健规划中的参与程度(EQUIP):一种新的患者报告结局指标的共同开发
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 10;11(3):e0149973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149973. eCollection 2016.
3
Development and psychometric properties of the client's assessment of treatment scale for supported accommodation (CAT-SA).
在中国上海进行的一项焦点小组研究:初级保健中轻度认知障碍的检测和管理挑战。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 20;12(9):e062240. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062240.
4
Qualitative assessment of patients' perspectives and needs from community pharmacists in substance use disorder management.定性评估社区药剂师在物质使用障碍管理中患者的观点和需求。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 May 1;16(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00374-x.
支持性住宿治疗量表(CAT-SA)的编制及其心理测量学特性
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 25;16:43. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0755-3.
4
Lowering Cardiovascular Disease Risk for People with Severe Mental Illnesses in Primary Care: A Focus Group Study.降低初级保健中严重精神疾病患者的心血管疾病风险:一项焦点小组研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0136603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136603. eCollection 2015.
5
Evaluation of a community awareness programme to reduce delays in referrals to early intervention services and enhance early detection of psychosis.一项旨在减少转介至早期干预服务的延迟并加强精神病早期检测的社区意识计划的评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 May 2;15:98. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0485-y.
6
The role of fear in mental health service users' experiences: a qualitative exploration.恐惧在心理健康服务使用者经历中的作用:一项质性探索。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Jul;50(7):1079-87. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1028-z. Epub 2015 Feb 22.
7
"Walking alongside:" collaborative practices in mental health and substance use care.“并肩同行”:精神健康和物质使用照护中的协作实践。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2014 Dec 17;8(1):55. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-8-55. eCollection 2014.
8
User-generated quality standards for youth mental health in primary care: a participatory research design using mixed methods.基层医疗中青年心理健康的用户生成质量标准:一项采用混合方法的参与式研究设计
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Oct;23(10):857-66. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002842. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
9
Mental health outreach and street policing in the downtown of a large French city.法国一座大城市市中心的心理健康外展服务与街头治安工作。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Jul-Aug;37(4):376-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
10
Focus group research: what is it and how can it be used?焦点小组研究:它是什么以及如何使用?
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Winter;24(1):16-22.