Scally Benjamin J, Krieger Nancy, Chen Jarvis T
Emergency Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, United Kingdom.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Jun;29(6):527-537. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1027-y. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
In order to improve colorectal cancer outcomes in the United States, there is an urgent need for research on the drivers of geographic disparities in stage at diagnosis. Our objective was to determine the effects of racialized economic segregation on the odds of late diagnosis.
Among 187,843 adults (≥ 18 years old) with new diagnoses of colorectal cancer reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results program between 1st January 2009 and 31st December 2013, exposure to racialized economic segregation was measured at the county-level using Index of Concentration at the Extremes metrics. Multilevel logistic regression models including registry and county random effects were fit to examine the association between racialized economic segregation and odds of metastatic disease at time of diagnosis.
Odds of late diagnosis were greatest in counties with the lowest compared to highest quintile for racial and economic privilege (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.09-1.20). In multilevel models adjusting for individual-level covariates, odds of late diagnosis were greater for all patients except those living in counties with the highest concentration of white high-income individuals. There was significant effect modification of this relationship by age, with greater adverse effects for younger adults (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.02-1.32) than older adults (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.00-1.11). Racialized economic segregation was strongly associated with access to affordable healthcare.
Spatial social polarization, quantified in relation to racialized economic segregation, increases the odds of late diagnosis of colorectal cancer for persons residing in the least compared to most privileged counties.
为改善美国结直肠癌的治疗效果,迫切需要对诊断时分期的地理差异驱动因素进行研究。我们的目标是确定种族化经济隔离对晚期诊断几率的影响。
在2009年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间向监测、流行病学和最终结果计划报告的187,843名新诊断为结直肠癌的成年人(≥18岁)中,使用极端集中度指数在县一级衡量种族化经济隔离情况。采用包含登记处和县级随机效应的多水平逻辑回归模型,以检验种族化经济隔离与诊断时转移性疾病几率之间的关联。
与种族和经济特权最高五分位数的县相比,最低五分位数的县晚期诊断几率最高(比值比1.14;95%置信区间1.09 - 1.20)。在调整个体水平协变量的多水平模型中,除居住在白人高收入个体集中度最高的县的患者外,所有患者的晚期诊断几率都更高。年龄对这种关系有显著的效应修正作用,年轻成年人(比值比1.16;95%置信区间1.02 - 1.32)比年长成年人(比值比1.06;95%置信区间1.00 - 1.11)受到的不利影响更大。种族化经济隔离与获得可负担医疗保健的机会密切相关。
与最具特权的县相比,居住在最缺乏特权县的人,与种族化经济隔离相关的空间社会两极分化会增加结直肠癌晚期诊断的几率。