Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Center for Public Health Initiatives, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jan 12;29(2):329-334. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab258.
The purpose of this study was to measure the association between neighborhood deprivation and cesarean delivery following labor induction among people delivering at term (≥37 weeks of gestation).
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of people ≥37 weeks of gestation, with a live, singleton gestation, who underwent labor induction from 2010 to 2017 at Penn Medicine. We excluded people with a prior cesarean delivery and those with missing geocoding information. Our primary exposure was a nationally validated Area Deprivation Index with scores ranging from 1 to 100 (least to most deprived). We used a generalized linear mixed model to calculate the odds of postinduction cesarean delivery among people in 4 equally-spaced levels of neighborhood deprivation. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis with residential mobility.
Our cohort contained 8672 people receiving an induction at Penn Medicine. After adjustment for confounders, we found that people living in the most deprived neighborhoods were at a 29% increased risk of post-induction cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.57) compared to the least deprived. In a sensitivity analysis, including residential mobility seemed to magnify the effect sizes of the association between neighborhood deprivation and postinduction cesarean delivery, but this information was only available for a subset of people.
People living in neighborhoods with higher deprivation had higher odds of postinduction cesarean delivery compared to people living in less deprived neighborhoods. This work represents an important first step in understanding the impact of disadvantaged neighborhoods on adverse delivery outcomes.
本研究旨在衡量分娩诱导后与邻里剥夺相关的剖宫产率,研究对象为足月(≥37 周妊娠)分娩者。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入 2010 年至 2017 年在宾夕法尼亚大学医学中心接受分娩诱导的≥37 周妊娠、活单胎妊娠者,排除了既往剖宫产和缺少地理编码信息的患者。我们的主要暴露因素是一种全国性验证的区域剥夺指数,评分范围为 1 至 100(从最不贫困到最贫困)。我们使用广义线性混合模型计算处于 4 个同等间隔的邻里剥夺水平的人群中诱导后剖宫产的几率。我们还进行了一项敏感性分析,包括居住流动性。
我们的队列包括在宾夕法尼亚大学医学中心接受诱导的 8672 名患者。在调整混杂因素后,我们发现生活在最贫困社区的人群诱导后行剖宫产的风险增加了 29%(校正比值比=1.29,95%置信区间,1.05-1.57),与最不贫困的人群相比。在敏感性分析中,包括居住流动性似乎会放大邻里剥夺与诱导后剖宫产之间的关联的效应大小,但该信息仅适用于部分人群。
与生活在贫困程度较低的社区的人群相比,生活在剥夺程度较高的社区的人群诱导后行剖宫产的几率更高。这项工作代表了理解贫困社区对不良分娩结局影响的重要的第一步。