Center of Research On Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases (CoRPS), Department of Medical & Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Doctor Deelenlaan 5, 5042 AD, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Int J Behav Med. 2024 Feb;31(1):130-144. doi: 10.1007/s12529-023-10170-5. Epub 2023 May 11.
Psychosocial factors tend to cluster and exhibit differences associated with sex assigned at birth. Gender disparities, though, remain uncharted so far. The current study aimed to first explore the clustering of eight established psychosocial risk factors among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), followed by examining how sex and gender differences characterize these psychosocial risk profiles, while adjusting for the effect of age.
In total, 532 patients with CHD (M = 68.2 ± 8.9; 84% male) completed the comprehensive psychosocial screener and questionnaires to gauge gender identity, traits, and sociocultural norm scores. A three-step latent profile analysis (LPA) was performed to identify latent profiles and their correlates.
LPA revealed six psychosocial risk profiles: (1) somewhat distressed overall (32%); (2) low distress (27%); (3) anger, hostility, and Type D (15%); (4) emotional distress and trauma (11%); (5) anxiety (9%); and (6) high overall distress (7%). Masculine traits and older age increased the odds to belong to the low distress profile (#2), while feminine traits and a feminine gender norm score increased the chance to belong to profiles with moderate to high distress. The effects of gender identity and feminine traits were sex dependent.
The current study's findings explain heterogeneity among patients with CHD by considering the joint occurrence of psychosocial risk factors, and the role of sex, age, and gender within those profiles. Being more sensitive to the roles that sex, gender, and an integrated set of risk factors play may ultimately improve treatment and adherence.
心理社会因素往往会聚集在一起,并表现出与出生时性别相关的差异。然而,性别差异至今仍未被发现。本研究旨在首先探索 8 种已确立的心理社会危险因素在冠心病(CHD)患者中的聚集情况,然后研究性别和性别差异如何描述这些心理社会风险特征,同时调整年龄的影响。
共有 532 名 CHD 患者(M=68.2±8.9;84%为男性)完成了全面的心理社会筛查以及评估性别认同、特征和社会文化规范得分的问卷。采用三步潜类分析(LPA)来识别潜在类别及其相关性。
LPA 揭示了 6 种心理社会风险特征:(1)整体有些困扰(32%);(2)低困扰(27%);(3)愤怒、敌意和 D 型人格(15%);(4)情绪困扰和创伤(11%);(5)焦虑(9%);(6)整体高度困扰(7%)。男性特质和年龄较大增加了属于低困扰特征(#2)的可能性,而女性特质和女性性别规范得分增加了属于中度至高度困扰特征的可能性。性别认同和女性特质的影响具有性别依赖性。
本研究通过考虑心理社会危险因素的共同发生,以及这些特征中性别、年龄和性别的作用,解释了 CHD 患者的异质性。更敏感地认识到性别、性别和一整套危险因素所起的作用,最终可能会改善治疗和依从性。