Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Radiology, Yonghe Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):1183-1192.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.047. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
The variability in measuring the tortuosity of the thoracic aorta has not been previously studied. This study evaluated the interobserver and intraobserver variability of major methods used for measuring the tortuosity of the thoracic aorta in patients with aortic arch or descending thoracic aortic aneurysm.
This retrospective study enrolled 66 patients with aortic arch or descending thoracic aortic aneurysm who had undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Two radiologists used preoperative computed tomography images to measure the tortuosity of the thoracic aorta at multiple segments by using the fitting circle diameter, tortuosity index, and centerline angle methods; these measurements were repeated after an interval of >28 days. The variability of the methods was analyzed for interobserver and intraobserver reliability and agreement. The estimated intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to analyze the reliability. The Bland-Altman plot was used to analyze the interobserver and intraobserver agreement. The association between aortic characteristics, including calcification, luminal irregularity, shape, and diameter, and the variability of the measurements was also analyzed.
The interobserver ICC estimates for the tortuosity index at multiple aortic segments, centerline angle methods at the supra-aortic branch orifices, and fitting circle diameter on the greater and lesser curvature sides were 0.97 to 0.98, 0.39 to 0.75, and 0.82 to 0.84, respectively. The corresponding intraobserver ICC estimates were 0.98 to 1.00, 0.44 to 0.75, and 0.82 to 0.85, respectively. In the agreement analysis, the 95% limits of agreement for the tortuosity index, centerline angle, and fitting circle diameter were -5.5% to 5.6%, -10.9% to 10.9%, and -18.0% to 24.0%, respectively. The tortuosity index had the highest ICC estimate and narrowest 99.5% limits of agreement of the three methods. Aortic characteristics, including calcification, grade of atheroma, aneurysm shape, and diameter, were not associated with the variability of the tortuosity index method in the thoracic aorta.
The tortuosity index method has low interobserver and intraobserver variability in measuring the tortuosity of the thoracic aorta in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm. The characteristics of the aorta and aneurysm are not associated with the interobserver or intraobserver variability of the tortuosity index.
目前尚未研究测量胸主动脉迂曲度的变异性。本研究评估了用于测量胸主动脉弓或降主动脉胸主动脉瘤患者胸主动脉迂曲度的主要方法的观察者间和观察者内变异性。
本回顾性研究纳入了 66 例接受胸主动脉腔内修复术的主动脉弓或降主动脉胸主动脉瘤患者。两名放射科医生使用术前计算机断层扫描图像,通过拟合圆直径、迂曲指数和中心线角度方法测量多个节段的胸主动脉迂曲度;>28 天后重复这些测量。分析了观察者间和观察者内可靠性和一致性的方法变异性。采用组内相关系数(ICC)估计值分析可靠性。采用 Bland-Altman 图分析观察者间和观察者内的一致性。还分析了主动脉特征(包括钙化、管腔不规则、形状和直径)与测量值变异性之间的关系。
多个主动脉节段迂曲指数、主动脉弓分支开口中心线角度方法和较大、较小曲率侧拟合圆直径的观察者间 ICC 估计值分别为 0.97 至 0.98、0.39 至 0.75 和 0.82 至 0.84。相应的观察者内 ICC 估计值分别为 0.98 至 1.00、0.44 至 0.75 和 0.82 至 0.85。在一致性分析中,迂曲指数、中心线角度和拟合圆直径的 95%一致性界限分别为-5.5%至 5.6%、-10.9%至 10.9%和-18.0%至 24.0%。在三种方法中,迂曲指数具有最高的 ICC 估计值和最窄的 99.5%一致性界限。主动脉特征(包括钙化、动脉粥样硬化程度、动脉瘤形状和直径)与胸主动脉迂曲指数方法的观察者间和观察者内变异性无关。
在测量胸主动脉瘤患者胸主动脉迂曲度时,迂曲指数方法的观察者间和观察者内变异性较低。主动脉和动脉瘤的特征与迂曲指数的观察者间或观察者内变异性无关。