Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom; Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Department of Clinical, Education and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Aug;3(8):694-703. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
The aim of the current paper is to provide the first comparison of computational mechanisms and neurofunctional substrates in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) during decision making under ambiguity.
Sixteen boys with ADHD, 20 boys with OCD, and 20 matched control subjects (12-18 years of age) completed a functional magnetic resonance imaging version of the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain activation was compared between groups using three-way analysis of covariance. Hierarchical Bayesian analysis was used to compare computational modeling parameters between groups.
Patient groups shared reduced choice consistency and relied less on reinforcement learning during decision making relative to control subjects, while adolescents with ADHD alone demonstrated increased reward sensitivity. During advantageous choices, both disorders shared underactivation in ventral striatum, while OCD patients showed disorder-specific underactivation in the ventromedial orbitofrontal cortex. During outcome evaluation, shared underactivation to losses in patients relative to control subjects was found in the medial prefrontal cortex and shared underactivation to wins was found in the left putamen/caudate. ADHD boys showed disorder-specific dysfunction in the right putamen/caudate, which was activated more to losses in patients with ADHD but more to wins in control subjects.
The findings suggest shared deficits in using learned reward expectancies to guide decision making, as well as shared dysfunction in medio-fronto-striato-limbic brain regions. However, findings of unique dysfunction in the ventromedial orbitofrontal cortex in OCD and in the right putamen in ADHD indicate additional, disorder-specific abnormalities and extend similar findings from inhibitory control tasks in the disorders to the domain of decision making under ambiguity.
本研究旨在首次比较注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和强迫症(OCD)青少年在不确定条件下进行决策时的计算机制和神经功能基础。
16 名 ADHD 男孩、20 名 OCD 男孩和 20 名匹配的对照组(12-18 岁)完成了功能磁共振成像版的爱荷华赌博任务。采用三因素协方差分析比较组间脑激活情况。采用分层贝叶斯分析比较组间计算模型参数。
与对照组相比,患者组在决策过程中一致性选择减少,对强化学习的依赖减少,而 ADHD 青少年的奖励敏感性增加。在有利选择中,两种疾病的腹侧纹状体均表现出激活不足,而 OCD 患者的腹内侧眶额皮层则表现出特定疾病的激活不足。在结果评估中,与对照组相比,患者的中前额叶皮质对损失的激活减少,左壳核/尾状核对收益的激活减少。ADHD 男孩的右壳核/尾状核表现出特定疾病的功能障碍,该区域在 ADHD 患者中对损失的激活更多,但在对照组中对收益的激活更多。
研究结果表明,两种疾病在使用习得的奖励预期来指导决策方面存在共同的缺陷,并且在中前额纹状体边缘脑区存在共同的功能障碍。然而,在 OCD 中发现了腹内侧眶额皮层和 ADHD 中发现了右侧壳核/尾状核的独特功能障碍,这表明存在额外的、特定于疾病的异常,并将两种疾病在抑制控制任务中的类似发现扩展到不确定条件下的决策领域。