Kohler Jennefer N, Turbitt Erin, Biesecker Barbara B
Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Jun;25(6):662-668. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.10. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
Researchers and clinicians refer to outcomes of genomic testing that extend beyond clinical utility as 'personal utility'. No systematic delineation of personal utility exists, making it challenging to appreciate its scope. Identifying empirical elements of personal utility reported in the literature offers an inventory that can be subsequently ranked for its relative value by those who have undergone genomic testing. A systematic review was conducted of the peer-reviewed literature reporting non-health-related outcomes of genomic testing from 1 January 2003 to 5 August 2016. Inclusion criteria specified English language, date of publication, and presence of empirical evidence. Identified outcomes were iteratively coded into unique domains. The search returned 551 abstracts from which 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. Study populations and type of genomic testing varied. Coding resulted in 15 distinct elements of personal utility, organized into three domains related to personal outcomes: affective, cognitive, and behavioral; and one domain related to social outcomes. The domains of personal utility may inform pre-test counseling by helping patients anticipate potential value of test results beyond clinical utility. Identified elements may also inform investigations into the prevalence and importance of personal utility to future test users.
研究人员和临床医生将基因组检测超出临床效用的结果称为“个人效用”。目前尚无对个人效用的系统描述,这使得理解其范围具有挑战性。识别文献中报道的个人效用的实证要素,可提供一份清单,随后接受基因组检测的人可据此对其相对价值进行排序。我们对2003年1月1日至2016年8月5日期间报道基因组检测非健康相关结果的同行评审文献进行了系统综述。纳入标准包括英文文献、发表日期以及存在实证证据。将识别出的结果反复编码为独特的领域。检索共返回551篇摘要,其中31项研究符合纳入标准。研究人群和基因组检测类型各不相同。编码产生了15个不同的个人效用要素,分为与个人结果相关的三个领域:情感、认知和行为;以及一个与社会结果相关的领域。个人效用领域可通过帮助患者预期检测结果超出临床效用的潜在价值,为检测前咨询提供参考。识别出的要素还可为个人效用对未来检测使用者的普遍性和重要性的调查提供参考。