Clough M, Foletta P, Frohman A N, Sears D, Ternes A, White O B, Fielding J
Department of Neurosciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Australia.
School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Australia.
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2018 Apr 17;4(2):2055217318771781. doi: 10.1177/2055217318771781. eCollection 2018 Apr-Jun.
It has been suggested that switching ability might not be affected in multiple sclerosis (MS) as previously thought; however, whether this is true under more 'real-world' conditions when asymmetry in task difficulty is present has not been ascertained.
The objective of this paper is to examine the impact of task difficulty asymmetry on task switching ability in MS.
An ocular motor (OM) paradigm that interleaves the simple task of looking towards a target (prosaccade, PS) with the cognitively more difficult task of looking away from a target (antisaccade, PS) was used. Two switching conditions: (1) PS switch cost, switching to a simple task from a difficult task (PS switch), relative to performing two simple tasks concurrently (PS repeat); (2) AS switch cost, switching to a difficult task from a simple task (AS switch) relative to performing two difficult tasks concurrently (AS repeat). Forty-five relapsing-remitting MS patients and 30 control individuals were compared.
Controls and patients produced a similar magnitude PS switch cost, suggesting that task difficulty asymmetry does not detrimentally impact MS patients when transitioning from a more difficult task to a simpler task. However, MS patients alone found switching from the simpler PS trial to the more difficult AS trial (shorter latency and reduced error) than performing two AS trials consecutively (AS switch benefit). Further, MS patients performed significantly more errors than controls when required to repeat the same trial consecutively.
MS patients appear to find the maintenance of task-relevant processes difficult not switching per se, with deficits exacerbated under increased attentional demands.
有人提出,多发性硬化症(MS)患者的转换能力可能不像之前认为的那样受到影响;然而,在存在任务难度不对称的更“现实世界”条件下情况是否如此尚未得到确定。
本文的目的是研究任务难度不对称对MS患者任务转换能力的影响。
采用一种眼动(OM)范式,该范式将看向目标的简单任务(顺向眼跳,PS)与认知上更困难的看向目标之外的任务(逆向眼跳,AS)交织在一起。两种转换条件:(1)PS转换代价,从困难任务转换到简单任务(PS转换)相对于同时执行两个简单任务(PS重复);(2)AS转换代价,从简单任务转换到困难任务(AS转换)相对于同时执行两个困难任务(AS重复)。对45名复发缓解型MS患者和30名对照个体进行了比较。
对照组和患者产生的PS转换代价幅度相似,这表明当从更困难的任务转换到更简单的任务时,任务难度不对称不会对MS患者产生不利影响。然而,仅MS患者发现从较简单的PS试验转换到较困难的AS试验(潜伏期更短且错误减少)比连续执行两个AS试验(AS转换益处)更有利。此外,当要求MS患者连续重复相同试验时,他们比对照组犯的错误明显更多。
MS患者似乎发现维持与任务相关的过程困难,而非转换本身困难,并且在注意力需求增加的情况下缺陷会加剧。