Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, 1715 Columbia Rd NE, Box 357988, 98195-7988, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, 1417 NE 42 Street, Box 354875, 98105-6246, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2019 Apr;20(2):205-215. doi: 10.1007/s10162-018-00713-z. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
Active listening involves dynamically switching attention between competing talkers and is essential to following conversations in everyday environments. Previous investigations in human listeners have examined the neural mechanisms that support switching auditory attention within the acoustic featural cues of pitch and auditory space. Here, we explored the cortical circuitry underlying endogenous switching of auditory attention between pitch and spatial cues necessary to discern target from masker words. Because these tasks are of unequal difficulty, we expected an asymmetry in behavioral switch costs for hard-to-easy versus easy-to-hard switches, mirroring prior evidence from vision-based cognitive task-switching paradigms. We investigated the neural correlates of this behavioral switch asymmetry and associated cognitive control operations in the present auditory paradigm. Behaviorally, we observed no switch-cost asymmetry, i.e., no performance difference for switching from the more difficult attend-pitch to the easier attend-space condition (P→S) versus switching from easy-to-hard (S→P). However, left lateral prefrontal cortex activity, correlated with improved performance, was observed during a silent gap period when listeners switched attention from P→S, relative to switching within pitch cues. No such differential activity was seen for the analogous easy-to-hard switch. We hypothesize that this neural switch asymmetry reflects proactive cognitive control mechanisms that successfully reconfigured neurally-specified task parameters and resolved competition from other such "task sets," thereby obviating the expected behavioral switch-cost asymmetry. The neural switch activity observed was generally consistent with that seen in cognitive paradigms, suggesting that established cognitive models of attention switching may be productively applied to better understand similar processes in audition.
主动倾听涉及在竞争说话者之间动态切换注意力,这对于在日常环境中进行对话至关重要。以前在人类听众中的研究已经研究了支持在音高和听觉空间的听觉特征线索内切换听觉注意力的神经机制。在这里,我们探索了在区分目标和掩蔽词时,在大脑皮质电路中,主动在音高和空间线索之间切换听觉注意力的基础。由于这些任务具有不同的难度,我们预计在难以容易切换与容易困难切换之间的行为切换成本会出现不对称,这与来自基于视觉的认知任务切换范式的先前证据相呼应。我们在目前的听觉范式中研究了这种行为切换不对称的神经相关性及其相关的认知控制操作。在行为上,我们没有观察到切换成本的不对称,即在从更困难的注意音高切换到更简单的注意空间条件(P→S)与从容易到困难的切换(S→P)之间,没有表现出差异。然而,在听众从 P→S 切换注意力时,与在音高线索内切换相比,左外侧前额叶皮层的活动与改善的表现相关,这期间存在一个安静的间隙期。对于类似的容易到困难的切换,没有观察到这种差异活动。我们假设这种神经切换不对称反映了主动认知控制机制,这些机制成功地重新配置了神经指定的任务参数,并解决了来自其他此类“任务集”的竞争,从而消除了预期的行为切换成本不对称。观察到的神经切换活动通常与认知范式中观察到的活动一致,这表明注意力切换的既定认知模型可能会被有效地应用于更好地理解听觉中的类似过程。