State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, China.
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Sep 15;636:383-391. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.279. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
Non-invasive samples present ethical and practical benefits for investigating human exposure to hazardous contaminants, but analytical challenges and difficulties to interpret the results limit their application in biomonitoring. Here we investigated the potential for using hair, nail and urine samples as a measure of internal exposure to an array of legacy and emerging per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in two populations with different exposure conditions. Paired urine-serum measurements of PFASs from a group of highly exposed fishery employees displayed strong correlations for PFASs with three to eight perfluorinated carbons (ρ > 0.653; p < 0.01). Consistent statistical correlations and transfer ratios in nails and hair from both populations demonstrated that these non-invasive samples can be used as a measure of internal exposure to perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and C8 chlorinated polyfluoralkyl ether sulfonic acid (C8 Cl-PFESA). Contrastingly, the infrequent detections and/or lack of consistent transfer ratios for perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorononanoic acid and short-chain PFASs in hair and nail samples indicate passive uptake from the external environment rather than uptake and internal distribution. Collectively, the study supports the use of urine samples as a valid measure of internal exposure for a range of short- and medium-chain PFASs, while the validity of nail and hair samples as a measure of internal exposure may vary for different PFASs and populations. The ubiquitous detection of C8 Cl-PFESA in all sample matrices from both populations indicates widespread exposure to this contaminant of emerging concern in China.
非侵入性样本在研究人类暴露于有害污染物方面具有伦理和实际优势,但分析挑战和解读结果的困难限制了它们在生物监测中的应用。在这里,我们研究了头发、指甲和尿液样本作为衡量两个具有不同暴露条件人群中一系列传统和新兴全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFASs)内暴露的潜在用途。一组高暴露渔业工人的尿 - 血清 PFASs 配对测量显示,具有三到八个全氟化碳的 PFASs 之间存在很强的相关性(ρ>0.653;p<0.01)。来自两个人群的指甲和头发中一致的统计相关性和转移比表明,这些非侵入性样本可用于衡量全氟辛烷磺酸和 C8 氯化多氟烷基醚磺酸(C8 Cl-PFESA)的内暴露。相比之下,头发和指甲样本中全氟辛酸、全氟壬酸和短链 PFASs 的频繁检测和/或缺乏一致的转移比表明,它们是从外部环境被动摄取的,而不是摄取和内部分布。总的来说,该研究支持将尿液样本作为衡量一系列短链和中链 PFASs 内暴露的有效方法,而指甲和头发样本作为内暴露衡量方法的有效性可能因不同的 PFASs 和人群而异。来自两个人群的所有样本基质中均普遍检测到 C8 Cl-PFESA,表明这种新兴关注污染物在中国广泛暴露。