Suppr超能文献

评估心脏风险:早期临床药物研发中的暴露-反应分析

Evaluating cardiac risk: exposure response analysis in early clinical drug development.

作者信息

Grenier Julie, Paglialunga Sabina, Morimoto Bruce H, Lester Robert M

机构信息

Data Management and Biometric, Celerion, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Scientific Affairs, Celerion, Lincoln, NE, USA.

出版信息

Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2018 Apr 18;10:27-36. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S133286. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

The assessment of a drug's cardiac liability has undergone considerable metamorphosis by regulators since International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirement for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use E14 guideline was introduced in 2005. Drug developers now have a choice in how proarrhythmia risk can be evaluated; the options include a dedicated thorough QT (TQT) study or exposure response (ER) modeling of intensive electrocardiogram (ECG) captured in early clinical development. The alternative approach of ER modeling was incorporated into a guidance document in 2015 as a primary analysis tool which could be utilized in early phase dose escalation studies as an option to perform a dedicated TQT trial. This review will describe the current state of ER modeling of intensive ECG data collected during early clinical drug development; the requirements with regard to the use of a positive control; and address the challenges and opportunities of this alternative approach to assessing QT liability.

摘要

自2005年引入《人用药品注册技术国际协调会E14指南》以来,监管机构对药物心脏安全性的评估发生了重大变化。药物研发人员现在对于如何评估致心律失常风险有了选择;这些选项包括专门的全面QT(TQT)研究,或对早期临床开发中采集的密集心电图(ECG)进行暴露-反应(ER)建模。ER建模这一替代方法在2015年被纳入一份指导文件,作为一种主要分析工具,可用于早期剂量递增研究,作为进行专门TQT试验的一种选择。本综述将描述早期临床药物开发期间收集的密集ECG数据的ER建模现状;使用阳性对照的要求;并探讨这种评估QT安全性的替代方法所面临的挑战和机遇。

相似文献

1
Evaluating cardiac risk: exposure response analysis in early clinical drug development.
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2018 Apr 18;10:27-36. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S133286. eCollection 2018.
3
The prospective IQ-CSRC trial: A prototype early clinical proarrhythmia assessment investigation for replacing the ICH E14 thorough QTc (TQT) study.
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2016 Jul-Aug;80:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2016.02.181. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
4
Assay sensitivity in "Hybrid thorough QT/QTc (TQT)" study.
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(2):378-384. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1535498. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
5
Can an early phase clinical pharmacology study replace a thorough QT study? Experience with a novel H3-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 May;72(5):533-43. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2023-3. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
Drug-induced Proarrhythmia and Torsade de Pointes: A Primer for Students and Practitioners of Medicine and Pharmacy.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;58(8):997-1012. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1129. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
7
Enabling robust assessment of QTc prolongation in early phase clinical trials.
Pharm Stat. 2017 May;16(3):218-227. doi: 10.1002/pst.1806. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
8
ICH E14 Q & A (R1) document: perspectives on the updated recommendations on thorough QT studies.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Apr;75(4):959-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04442.x.
9
Should You Run a Dedicated TQT Study? Sponsor and Regulatory Considerations on Substitution Pathways to Assess QT Liability.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jul;116(1):42-51. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3284. Epub 2024 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Randomized Thorough QT Trial Using Concentration-QT Analysis to Evaluate the Effects of Centanafadine on Cardiac Repolarization.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2025 Aug;14(8):621-630. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.1545. Epub 2025 May 27.
4
Concentration-QTc and cardiac safety analysis of single and multiple zavegepant nasal spray doses in healthy participants to support approval.
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024 Jun;13(6):1044-1054. doi: 10.1002/psp4.13140. Epub 2024 May 29.
8
Update on ICH E14/S7B Cardiac Safety Regulations: The Expanded Role of Preclinical Assays and the "Double-Negative" Scenario.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Sep;10(9):964-973. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.1003. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
9
QT Assessment in Early Drug Development: The Long and the Short of It.
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Mar 15;20(6):1324. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061324.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimation of the Power of the Food Effect on QTc to Show Assay Sensitivity.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jan;58(1):81-88. doi: 10.1002/jcph.975. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
3
Electrocardiographic Biomarkers for Detection of Drug-Induced Late Sodium Current Block.
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 30;11(12):e0163619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163619. eCollection 2016.
4
Early drug development: assessment of proarrhythmic risk and cardiovascular safety.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Dec;9(12):1611-1618. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2016.1245142. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
5
Cardiovascular Safety Assessment in Early-Phase Clinical Studies: A Meta-Analytical Comparison of Exposure-Response Models.
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2016 Jun;5(6):324-35. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12086. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
7
The prospective IQ-CSRC trial: A prototype early clinical proarrhythmia assessment investigation for replacing the ICH E14 thorough QTc (TQT) study.
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2016 Jul-Aug;80:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2016.02.181. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
8
Evolution of strategies to improve preclinical cardiac safety testing.
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016 Jul;15(7):457-71. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2015.34. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验