Buckner Julia D, Walukevich Katherine A, Lemke Austin W, Jeffries Emily R
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, 236 Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA. ; Fax:1-225-578-4125.
Transl Issues Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;4(1):76-84. doi: 10.1037/tps0000147.
Over one-third of college students use cannabis, yet the majority of students experiencing cannabis-use problems are not interested in seeking treatment. Therefore, the campus judicial process following a violation of university cannabis policies may be an important point of intervention. This study examined whether cannabis use decreased following being sanctioned by the university for violation of campus drug policy. We also identified individual difference factors related to changes in post-infraction use. University students ( = 98, 73.1% White, 88.2% Male) were referred to participate in a brief motivational intervention study as a component of their sanctions following violation of campus cannabis policies. Data were collected during the intake appointment. Approximately 91% of participants reported decreased post-infraction cannabis use and 58% of the sample reported abstinence in the month prior to intake. The following variables were significantly related to both abstinence or to reducing frequent use (from at least four times per month to less frequently): using less frequently prior to their infraction, descriptive friend norms, and enhancement motives. The following variables were significantly related only to reducing frequent use: injunctive norms regarding parents and expansion motives. Students sanctioned for cannabis violations appear to decrease cannabis use post-infraction. Thus, results support campus efforts to sanction students for violation of campus cannabis use policies. Identification of individual difference variables that predict post-infraction change in cannabis use can inform treatment and prevention efforts.
超过三分之一的大学生使用大麻,然而,大多数有大麻使用问题的学生对寻求治疗并不感兴趣。因此,违反大学大麻政策后的校园司法程序可能是一个重要的干预点。本研究调查了因违反校园毒品政策而受到学校制裁后,大麻使用量是否会减少。我们还确定了与违规后使用量变化相关的个体差异因素。大学生(n = 98,73.1%为白人,88.2%为男性)因违反校园大麻政策而被转介参加一项简短的动机干预研究,作为其制裁措施的一部分。在初次预约时收集数据。大约91%的参与者报告称违规后大麻使用量减少,58%的样本报告在初次预约前一个月已戒除大麻。以下变量与戒除大麻或减少频繁使用(从每月至少四次减少到不那么频繁)均显著相关:违规前使用频率较低、描述性朋友规范和增强动机。以下变量仅与减少频繁使用显著相关:关于父母的指令性规范和扩展动机。因违反大麻规定而受到制裁的学生在违规后似乎减少了大麻使用量。因此,研究结果支持校园针对违反校园大麻使用政策的学生进行制裁的努力。识别预测违规后大麻使用量变化的个体差异变量可为治疗和预防工作提供参考。