Department of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jan;23(1):423-433. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2451-9. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
This study used three LASERs (red, green, and blue) with a spectrophotometer to compare the light propagation for the following: absorption (A), transmittance (T), attenuation (K), and scattering anisotropy coefficient (g) in dental tissues and nano-filled resin-based composites. This study used three distinct incremental build-up techniques, which included one shade (body), two shades (enamel and dentin), and three shades (enamel, transparent, and dentin).
Twenty human, un-erupted, recently extracted third molars (shade B1) were used to obtain 40 tooth slabs. The samples were randomized and equally distributed into four experimental groups. The Positive Control Group included dental tissues with enamel, dento-enamel junction DEJ, and dentin; the Technique 1 group (T1) included one shade tissues, B1B; the Technique 2 group (T2) included two-shades tissues, A2Dentin and B1Enamel; and the Technique 3 group (T3) included three shade tissues, A2Dentin, Transparent, and B1Enamel. Cavity preparation was standardized, and, using the spectrophotometer, each specimen was irradiated by three LASERs. A voltmeter recorded the light-output signal, and from this raw data, the following optical constants (A, T, K, g) were calculated.
ANOVA, followed by a post hoc Tukey's test (p < 0.05), revealed that absorption and transmittance in dental tissues were significantly different when comparing the three build-up technique groups. However, when examining attenuation coefficient, there was no significant difference in dental tissues for T2 and T3 as analyzed by blue and red lasers. There was also no significant difference among the three lasers for T2 and T3. There was also no significant effect of the types of experiments on the value of scattering anisotropy factor g for blue laser among the four experimental groups.
Within the limitations of this study, none of the build-up techniques were able to reproduce the dental tissues optical properties, and T2 and T3 resulted in a similar pattern of light propagation.
The clinical success of restorative procedures depends on selecting materials and techniques that emulate the natural tooth and provide long-term stability in color and optical properties.
本研究使用分光光度计比较三种激光(红、绿、蓝)在以下方面的光传播:牙体组织和纳米填充树脂基复合材料的吸收(A)、透射率(T)、衰减(K)和散射各向异性系数(g)。本研究使用三种不同的增量堆积技术,包括一种色调(体部)、两种色调(釉质和牙本质)和三种色调(釉质、透明和牙本质)。
使用 20 个人类未萌出的第三磨牙(色调 B1)获得 40 个牙板。将样本随机分为四组进行实验。阳性对照组包括釉质、釉牙本质界 DEJ 和牙本质的牙体组织;技术 1 组(T1)包括一种色调的组织,B1B;技术 2 组(T2)包括两种色调的组织,A2Dentin 和 B1Enamel;技术 3 组(T3)包括三种色调的组织,A2Dentin、透明和 B1Enamel。标准化窝洞预备,使用分光光度计,用三种激光照射每个标本。电压表记录光输出信号,从原始数据中计算出以下光学常数(A、T、K、g)。
方差分析(ANOVA)后,进行事后 Tukey 检验(p<0.05),结果表明,在比较三种堆积技术组时,牙体组织的吸收和透射率有显著差异。然而,当检查衰减系数时,蓝色和红色激光分析时,T2 和 T3 在牙体组织中没有显著差异。对于 T2 和 T3,三种激光之间也没有显著差异。在蓝色激光中,四种实验组中,实验类型对散射各向异性因子 g 值也没有显著影响。
在本研究的限制范围内,没有一种堆积技术能够复制牙体组织的光学特性,并且 T2 和 T3 导致了类似的光传播模式。
修复程序的临床成功取决于选择能够模拟天然牙齿并在颜色和光学特性方面提供长期稳定性的材料和技术。