Suppr超能文献

实验经济学中反应时间分析的基础知识

The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics.

作者信息

Spiliopoulos Leonidas, Ortmann Andreas

机构信息

1Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

2University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Exp Econ. 2018;21(2):383-433. doi: 10.1007/s10683-017-9528-1. Epub 2017 May 24.

Abstract

For decisions in the wild, time is of the essence. Available decision time is often cut short through natural or artificial constraints, or is impinged upon by the opportunity cost of time. Experimental economists have only recently begun to conduct experiments with time constraints and to analyze response time (RT) data, in contrast to experimental psychologists. RT analysis has proven valuable for the identification of individual and strategic decision processes including identification of social preferences in the latter case, model comparison/selection, and the investigation of heuristics that combine speed and performance by exploiting environmental regularities. Here we focus on the benefits, challenges, and desiderata of RT analysis in strategic decision making. We argue that unlocking the potential of RT analysis requires the adoption of process-based models instead of outcome-based models, and discuss how RT in the wild can be captured by time-constrained experiments in the lab. We conclude that RT analysis holds considerable potential for experimental economics, deserves greater attention as a methodological tool, and promises important insights on strategic decision making in naturally occurring environments.

摘要

对于现实中的决策而言,时间至关重要。可用的决策时间常常因自然或人为限制而缩短,或者受到时间机会成本的影响。与实验心理学家不同,实验经济学家直到最近才开始进行有时间限制的实验,并分析反应时间(RT)数据。RT分析已被证明对于识别个体和战略决策过程很有价值,包括在后一种情况下识别社会偏好、模型比较/选择,以及通过利用环境规律来研究结合速度和性能的启发式方法。在这里,我们关注RT分析在战略决策中的益处、挑战和需求。我们认为,要释放RT分析的潜力,需要采用基于过程的模型而非基于结果的模型,并讨论如何通过实验室中的时间限制实验来捕捉现实中的RT。我们得出结论,RT分析在实验经济学中具有相当大的潜力,作为一种方法工具值得更多关注,并有望为自然环境中的战略决策提供重要见解。

相似文献

1
The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics.实验经济学中反应时间分析的基础知识
Exp Econ. 2018;21(2):383-433. doi: 10.1007/s10683-017-9528-1. Epub 2017 May 24.
4
Studies in Ecological Rationality.生态理性研究。
Top Cogn Sci. 2022 Jul;14(3):467-491. doi: 10.1111/tops.12567. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
6
Economic evaluation and mental health: sparse past. fertile future?经济评估与心理健康:过往寥寥,未来可期?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 1999 Dec 1;2(4):163-167. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-176x(199912)2:4<163::aid-mhp64>3.0.co;2-1.
8
The Behavioural Economics of Music: Systematic review and future directions.音乐的行为经济学:系统评价与未来方向
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 May;76(5):1177-1194. doi: 10.1177/17470218221113761. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
9
Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart.《使我们变聪明的简单启发式策略》摘要
Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Oct;23(5):727-41; discussion 742-80. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00003447.

引用本文的文献

1
Deliberation during online bargaining reveals strategic information.在线讨价还价过程中的深思熟虑揭示了战略信息。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 18;122(7):e2410956122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2410956122. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
2
Stochastic heuristics for decisions under risk and uncertainty.风险和不确定性下决策的随机启发式方法。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 6;15:1438581. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1438581. eCollection 2024.
3
Humans can infer social preferences from decision speed alone.人类仅凭决策速度就能推断出社会偏好。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jun 20;22(6):e3002686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002686. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Profiling dynamic decision-makers.分析动态决策者。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0266366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266366. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

5
A Dual-Self Model of Impulse Control.冲动控制的双重自我模型。
Am Econ Rev. 2006 Dec;96(5):1449-76. doi: 10.1257/aer.96.5.1449.
8
Commentary: Fairness is intuitive.评论:公平是直观的。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 9;7:654. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00654. eCollection 2016.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验