Suppr超能文献

风险和不确定性下决策的随机启发式方法。

Stochastic heuristics for decisions under risk and uncertainty.

作者信息

Spiliopoulos Leonidas, Hertwig Ralph

机构信息

Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 6;15:1438581. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1438581. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Models of heuristics are often predicated on the desideratum that they should possess no free parameters. As a result, heuristic implementations are usually deterministic and do not allow for any choice errors, as the latter would require a parameter to regulate the magnitude of errors. We discuss the implications of this in light of research that highlights the evidence supporting stochastic choice and its dependence on preferential strength. We argue that, in principle, the existing models of deterministic heuristics should, and can, be quite easily modified to stochastic counterparts through the addition of an error mechanism. This requires a single free parameter in the error mechanism, whilst otherwise retaining the parameter-free cognitive processes in the deterministic component of existing heuristics. We present various types of error mechanisms applicable to heuristics and discuss their comparative virtues and drawbacks, paying particular attention to their impact on model comparisons between heuristics and parameter-rich models.

摘要

启发式模型通常基于这样一种需求,即它们不应具有自由参数。因此,启发式实现通常是确定性的,不允许有任何选择错误,因为后者需要一个参数来调节错误的大小。我们根据强调支持随机选择及其对偏好强度依赖性的研究来讨论这一点的含义。我们认为,原则上,现有的确定性启发式模型应该并且能够通过添加一个错误机制相当容易地修改为随机对应模型。这在错误机制中需要一个自由参数,同时在现有启发式的确定性部分中保留无参数的认知过程。我们提出了适用于启发式的各种类型的错误机制,并讨论了它们的相对优点和缺点,特别关注它们对启发式与参数丰富模型之间模型比较的影响。

相似文献

1
Stochastic heuristics for decisions under risk and uncertainty.
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 6;15:1438581. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1438581. eCollection 2024.
3
The complementary role of affect-based and cognitive heuristics to make decisions under conditions of ambivalence and complexity.
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 9;13(11):e0206724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206724. eCollection 2018.
4
Studies in Ecological Rationality.
Top Cogn Sci. 2022 Jul;14(3):467-491. doi: 10.1111/tops.12567. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
5
Modeling fast-and-frugal heuristics.
Psych J. 2022 Aug;11(4):600-611. doi: 10.1002/pchj.576. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
6
Heuristic decision-making in foster care matching: Evidence from a think-aloud study.
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Feb;88:400-411. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.007. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
7
Heuristic decision making in medicine.
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012 Mar;14(1):77-89. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.1/jmarewski.
8
Disease X epidemic control using a stochastic model and a deterministic approximation: Performance comparison with and without parameter uncertainties.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Jun;249:108136. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108136. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
9
Medical education should teach heuristics rather than train them away.
Med Educ. 2019 Apr;53(4):334-344. doi: 10.1111/medu.13789. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
10
Genetic Programming Hyper-Heuristics with Vehicle Collaboration for Uncertain Capacitated Arc Routing Problems.
Evol Comput. 2020 Winter;28(4):563-593. doi: 10.1162/evco_a_00267. Epub 2019 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Who you know is what you know: Modeling boundedly rational social sampling.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Feb;150(2):221-241. doi: 10.1037/xge0000799. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
A map of ecologically rational heuristics for uncertain strategic worlds.
Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;127(2):245-280. doi: 10.1037/rev0000171. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
3
Risk Preference: A View from Psychology.
J Econ Perspect. 2018;32(2):155-72.
4
The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics.
Exp Econ. 2018;21(2):383-433. doi: 10.1007/s10683-017-9528-1. Epub 2017 May 24.
5
The determinants of response time in a repeated constant-sum game: A robust Bayesian hierarchical dual-process model.
Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:107-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
6
Homo heuristicus: why biased minds make better inferences.
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;1(1):107-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x.
7
Testing process predictions of models of risky choice: a quantitative model comparison approach.
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 27;4:646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00646. eCollection 2013.
8
Heuristic decision making.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:451-82. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346.
9
The robust beauty of ordinary information.
Psychol Rev. 2010 Oct;117(4):1259-66. doi: 10.1037/a0020418.
10
The allocation of time in decision-making.
J Eur Econ Assoc. 2009;7(2):628-637. doi: 10.1162/jeea.2009.7.2-3.628.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验