Konovalov Arkady, Ruff Christian C
Department of Economics, Zurich Center for Neuroeconomics (ZNE), University of Zurich.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2022 Jan;13(1):e1559. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1559. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
Every decision we take is accompanied by a characteristic pattern of response delay, gaze position, pupil dilation, and neural activity. Nevertheless, many models of social decision making neglect the corresponding process tracing data and focus exclusively on the final choice outcome. Here, we argue that this is a mistake, as the use of process data can help to build better models of human behavior, create better experiments, and improve policy interventions. Specifically, such data allow us to unlock the "black box" of the decision process and evaluate the mechanisms underlying our social choices. Using these data, we can directly validate latent model variables, arbitrate between competing personal motives, and capture information processing strategies. These benefits are especially valuable in social science, where models must predict multi-faceted decisions that are taken in varying contexts and are based on many different types of information. This article is categorized under: Economics > Interactive Decision-Making Neuroscience > Cognition Psychology > Reasoning and Decision Making.
我们做出的每一个决定都伴随着反应延迟、注视位置、瞳孔扩张和神经活动的特定模式。然而,许多社会决策模型忽略了相应的过程追踪数据,只专注于最终的选择结果。在这里,我们认为这是一个错误,因为使用过程数据有助于构建更好的人类行为模型、设计更好的实验并改善政策干预。具体而言,这些数据使我们能够打开决策过程的“黑匣子”,评估我们社会选择背后的机制。利用这些数据,我们可以直接验证潜在模型变量,在相互竞争的个人动机之间进行仲裁,并捕捉信息处理策略。这些益处在社会科学中尤为重要,因为在社会科学领域,模型必须预测在不同情境下基于多种不同类型信息做出的多方面决策。本文分类如下:经济学>交互式决策;神经科学>认知;心理学>推理与决策。