Tateo Luca
Research Centre on Cultural Psychology, Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Room 4.225, Kroghstræde 3 D- K-9220, Aalborg Ø, Denmark.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2018 Sep;52(3):388-400. doi: 10.1007/s12124-018-9429-7.
Psychology of education must discuss a number of relevant ethical, political and societal issues that cannot be simply overlooked as non pertinent to the discipline. For too long educational and developmental psychology have take divergent routes and have not enough dialogued with other fields such as pedagogy. I argue that it is first of all necessary to conceptualize the work of schooling, that is educational processes of teaching and learning in specific social contexts, as complex and dilemmatic fields. I discuss contributions from the past and current debate to support my claim that education is inherently ambivalent and dilemmatic, while educational psychology is too often normative and prescriptive. As many authors have discussed educational processes as battlefields between political and economic tendencies, we cannot avoid to discuss the relationship of such tendencies and the developmental processes of the person. The work of schooling is an action projected towards an imagined future, and educational psychology cannot avoid questioning the predictions emerging from the current socio-economic and political trends.
教育心理学必须探讨一些相关的伦理、政治和社会问题,这些问题不能简单地被视为与该学科无关而被忽视。长期以来,教育心理学和发展心理学分道扬镳,与教育学等其他领域的对话不足。我认为,首先有必要将学校教育工作,即在特定社会背景下的教学和学习的教育过程,概念化为复杂且充满困境的领域。我讨论过去和当前辩论的贡献,以支持我的观点,即教育本质上是矛盾和充满困境的,而教育心理学往往是规范性和规定性的。正如许多作者将教育过程视为政治和经济倾向之间的战场一样,我们不可避免地要讨论这些倾向与个人发展过程之间的关系。学校教育工作是朝着想象中的未来进行的一种行动,教育心理学不能回避质疑当前社会经济和政治趋势所产生的预测。