• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding the ups and downs of living well: the voices of people experiencing early mental health recovery.理解生活得好的起起落落:经历早期心理健康康复的人的声音。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 4;18(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1703-1.
2
Not sick enough: Experiences of carers of people with mental illness negotiating care for their relatives with mental health services.病情还不够严重:精神病患者照料者在与心理健康服务机构协商为其亲属提供护理时的经历。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):403-411. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12399.
3
Ontological security and connectivity provided by pets: a study in the self-management of the everyday lives of people diagnosed with a long-term mental health condition.宠物提供的本体安全与联系:一项关于被诊断患有长期精神健康疾病的人群日常生活自我管理的研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 9;16(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1111-3.
4
Partners in Recovery: an early phase evaluation of an Australian mental health initiative using program logic and thematic analysis.康复伙伴:利用计划逻辑和主题分析对澳大利亚心理健康倡议的早期阶段评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 26;19(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4360-2.
5
Applying Strengths Model principles to build a rural community-based mental health support service and achieve recovery outcomes.应用优势模型原则建立基于农村社区的心理健康支持服务并实现康复成果。
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Feb;18(1):3708. doi: 10.22605/RRH3708. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
Is the Partners in Recovery program connecting with the intended population of people living with severe and persistent mental illness? What are their prioritised needs?“康复伙伴计划”是否与患有严重和持续性精神疾病的目标人群建立了联系?他们的优先需求是什么?
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Oct;41(5):566-572. doi: 10.1071/AH15248.
7
Quality of life, recovery and decision-making: a mixed methods study of mental health recovery in social care.生活质量、康复和决策:社会关怀中心理健康康复的混合方法研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;54(6):715-723. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1635-6. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
8
Mental illness, supported education, employment and recovery: Ben's story.精神疾病、支持性教育、就业与康复:本的故事。
Work. 2012;43(1):99-104. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1451.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
Knowing What to Do and Being Able to Do It: Influences on Parent Choice and Use of Practices to Support Young People Living with Mental Illness.知道该做什么并能够做到:对父母选择和采用支持患有精神疾病的年轻人的做法的影响。
Community Ment Health J. 2015 Oct;51(7):841-51. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9864-6. Epub 2015 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Inner Strength-A Systematic Review of Qualitative Empirical Studies.内在力量——定性实证研究的系统综述
Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Sep;39(3):e70102. doi: 10.1111/scs.70102.
2
'Life Minus Illness = Recovery': A Phenomenological Study About Experiences and Meanings of Recovery Among Individuals with Serious Mental Illness from Southern India.“减去疾病的生活 = 康复”:一项关于印度南部重度精神疾病患者康复经历与意义的现象学研究
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Feb;61(2):281-292. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01312-4. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
3
Recovery From Severe Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review of Service User and Informal Caregiver Perspectives.从严重心理健康问题中康复:对服务使用者和非正式照料者观点的系统综述
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 1;12:712026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.712026. eCollection 2021.
4
Essential Elements That Contribute to the Recovery of Persons With Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Scoping Study.有助于严重精神疾病患者康复的基本要素:一项系统的范围界定研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 19;11:586230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.586230. eCollection 2020.
5
Development of a Lived Experience-Based Digital Resource for a Digitally-Assisted Peer Support Program for Young People Experiencing Psychosis.为患有精神病的年轻人开发基于生活体验的数字资源,用于数字辅助同伴支持项目。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 2;11:635. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00635. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Partners in Recovery program evaluation: changes in unmet needs and recovery.康复伙伴计划评估:未满足需求和康复情况的变化
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Aug;42(4):445-452. doi: 10.1071/AH17004.
2
Mental Ill Health, Recovery and the Family Assemblage.精神疾病、康复与家庭组合
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;41(3):407-430. doi: 10.1007/s11013-017-9522-2.
3
What we talk about when we talk about recovery: a systematic review and best-fit framework synthesis of qualitative literature.当我们谈论康复时我们所谈论的内容:定性文献的系统评价与最佳适配框架综合分析
J Ment Health. 2017 Jun;26(3):291-304. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2016.1222056. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
4
Is the Partners in Recovery program connecting with the intended population of people living with severe and persistent mental illness? What are their prioritised needs?“康复伙伴计划”是否与患有严重和持续性精神疾病的目标人群建立了联系?他们的优先需求是什么?
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Oct;41(5):566-572. doi: 10.1071/AH15248.
5
Roles and competencies of the Support Facilitator in Australia's recovery-oriented mental health initiative: a qualitative study from Gippsland, Victoria.澳大利亚以康复为导向的心理健康倡议中支持协调员的角色与能力:来自维多利亚州吉普斯兰地区的一项定性研究
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Mar;41(1):91-97. doi: 10.1071/AH15183.
6
Doing mental health care integration: a qualitative study of a new work role.开展精神卫生保健整合:对一个新工作岗位的定性研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2015 Aug 22;9:32. doi: 10.1186/s13033-015-0025-7. eCollection 2015.
7
Uses and abuses of recovery: implementing recovery-oriented practices in mental health systems.利用和滥用康复:在精神卫生系统中实施以康复为导向的实践。
World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):12-20. doi: 10.1002/wps.20084.
8
Permanent supportive housing: assessing the evidence.永久性支持性住房:评估证据
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Mar 1;65(3):287-94. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300261.
9
Measuring the later stages of the recovery journey: insights gained from clubhouse members.衡量康复之旅的后期阶段:从会所成员那里获得的见解。
Community Ment Health J. 2013 Jun;49(3):323-30. doi: 10.1007/s10597-012-9533-y. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
10
Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis.心理健康中个人康复的概念框架:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;199(6):445-52. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733.

理解生活得好的起起落落:经历早期心理健康康复的人的声音。

Understanding the ups and downs of living well: the voices of people experiencing early mental health recovery.

机构信息

The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

University of Technology, Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 4;18(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1703-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-018-1703-1
PMID:29728097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5935906/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to better understand early-stage mental health recovery experiences of people living with severe and persistent mental illness and complex needs.

METHODS

Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 13 people engaged in an Australian program specifically designed for people facing complex barriers to their recovery. Interview data were analysed thematically using constant comparative methods.

RESULTS

Participants described engaging with seven interconnecting aspects of early recovery: (1) engaging with the challenge of recovery; (2) struggling for a secure and stable footing; (3) grieving for what was and what could have been; (4) seeking and finding hope; (5) navigating complex relationships; (6) connecting with formal and informal support, and finally, (7) juggling a complexity of health issues.

CONCLUSIONS

This study illuminated the complexity of earlier-stage recovery which was characterised both by challenging personal circumstances and a hope for the future. It illustrated that even at an early point in their recovery journey, and amidst these challenging circumstances, people still actively engage with support, draw on inner strengths, source resources and find accomplishments. Stability and security was foundational to the ability of participants to draw on their own strengths and move forward. Stability came when material needs, including housing, were addressed, and an individual was able to connect with a supportive network of workers, carers, friends and family.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在深入了解患有严重和持续性精神疾病及复杂需求的人群的早期心理健康康复体验。

方法

对 13 名参与澳大利亚专门为那些面临康复障碍的人设计的项目的人员进行了半结构化深入访谈。使用恒定性比较方法对访谈数据进行主题分析。

结果

参与者描述了他们在早期康复过程中涉及到七个相互关联的方面:(1)应对康复挑战;(2)努力获得安全稳定的基础;(3)为过去的失去和可能的失去而悲伤;(4)寻找并发现希望;(5)驾驭复杂的人际关系;(6)与正式和非正式支持建立联系,最后,(7)应对一系列复杂的健康问题。

结论

本研究阐明了早期康复的复杂性,其特点是个人环境具有挑战性,对未来充满希望。研究表明,即使在康复旅程的早期阶段,尽管面临这些具有挑战性的情况,人们仍然积极寻求支持,利用内在力量,寻找资源并取得成就。稳定和安全是参与者利用自身优势并向前发展的基础。当满足包括住房在内的物质需求,以及个人能够与支持性的工作人员、照顾者、朋友和家人网络建立联系时,稳定性就会出现。