The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Aug;84:28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
Despite establishment of advocacies centered on using patient-centered care to improve disease-related behavioral changes and health outcomes, studies have seldom discussed incorporation of patient-centered care concept in the design of secondary cardiac prevention.
This review aimed to identify, appraise, and examine existing evidence on the effectiveness of nurse-led patient-centered care for secondary cardiac prevention in patients with coronary heart disease.
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials focusing on nurse-led patient-centered care for secondary cardiac prevention was conducted. Primary outcomes were behavioral risks (e.g. smoking, physical activity), secondary outcomes were clinically relevant physiological parameters (e.g. body weight, blood pressure, blood glucose, blood lipoproteins), health-related quality of life, mortality, and self efficacy.
Twenty-three English and seven Chinese electronic databases were searched to identify the trials.
The studies' eligibility and methodological quality were assessed by two reviewers independently according to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Statistical heterogeneities of the included studies were assessed by Higgins I2 and quantitative pooling was performed when studies showed sufficient comparability.
15 articles on 12 randomized controlled trials were included in this review. Methodological quality of the included studies was fair. Based on the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for experimental studies, the included studies had met a mean of six criteria out the ten in this appraisal tool. The meta-analyses of the included studies revealed that nurse-led patient-centered care had significantly improved patients' smoking habits, adherence toward physical activity advices, and total cholesterol level with medical regime optimization, in short- to medium-term. The intervention was also favorable in improving the patients' health-related quality of life in several domains of SF-36. Furthermore, from single-study results, the intervention was favorable in improving the patients' weight management and alcohol consumption. However, it did not show significant effects on improving the patient's dietary habits, certain cardiac physiological parameters, mortality and self-efficacy. Currently, no addition long-term benefit of the intervention on secondary cardiac prevention was identified.
This review has systematically analyzed the effects of nurse-led patient-centered care on patients' behavioral risks, cardiac physiological parameters, mortality, health-related quality of life and self-efficacy. Given limited quantity of existing evidence regarding certain outcomes and long-term follow-up period; cross-trial heterogeneity of the interventions, measurement methods and statistical results; high or unclear risk of bias in some quality dimensions, the effectiveness of the intervention on secondary cardiac prevention remains inconclusive and subject to additional trials and evidences.
尽管以患者为中心的护理理念已经得到广泛认可,并被用于改善与疾病相关的行为改变和健康结局,但在二级心脏预防的设计中,很少有研究讨论将以患者为中心的护理理念纳入其中。
本综述旨在确定、评价和检验现有的关于护士主导的以患者为中心的护理对冠心病患者二级心脏预防效果的证据。
对护士主导的以患者为中心的护理对二级心脏预防的随机对照试验进行了系统评价。主要结果是行为风险(如吸烟、体力活动),次要结果是临床相关的生理参数(如体重、血压、血糖、血脂)、健康相关生活质量、死亡率和自我效能。
检索了 23 个英文和 7 个中文电子数据库,以确定试验。
两名综述作者按照 Joanna Briggs 研究所的指南,独立评估研究的纳入和方法学质量。通过 Higgins I²评估纳入研究的异质性,如果研究具有足够的可比性,则进行定量合并。
本综述共纳入了 15 篇关于 12 项随机对照试验的文章。纳入研究的方法学质量为中等。根据 Joanna Briggs 研究所对实验研究的批判性评价工具,纳入研究平均符合该评价工具 10 项标准中的 6 项。纳入研究的荟萃分析显示,在短期至中期,护士主导的以患者为中心的护理显著改善了患者的吸烟习惯、对体力活动建议的依从性以及通过优化医疗方案改善总胆固醇水平。该干预措施在改善患者 SF-36 几个领域的健康相关生活质量方面也具有优势。此外,从单项研究结果来看,该干预措施有利于患者的体重管理和饮酒控制。然而,它对改善患者的饮食习惯、某些心脏生理参数、死亡率和自我效能没有显示出显著效果。目前,没有发现该干预措施对二级心脏预防有额外的长期益处。
本综述系统分析了护士主导的以患者为中心的护理对患者行为风险、心脏生理参数、死亡率、健康相关生活质量和自我效能的影响。鉴于某些结果的现有证据数量有限,以及长期随访期;干预措施、测量方法和统计结果的跨试验异质性;一些质量维度的高风险或不明确的偏倚,该干预措施对二级心脏预防的效果仍不确定,需要进一步的试验和证据。