Suppr超能文献

双线圈经颅磁刺激(TMS)对小脑脑抑制(CBI)的刺激强度和线圈类型对可靠性和耐受性的影响。

The Impact of Stimulation Intensity and Coil Type on Reliability and Tolerability of Cerebellar Brain Inhibition (CBI) via Dual-Coil TMS.

机构信息

Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria,, 3220, Australia.

Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria,, 3220, Australia.

出版信息

Cerebellum. 2018 Oct;17(5):540-549. doi: 10.1007/s12311-018-0942-5.

Abstract

Cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) describes the inhibitory tone the cerebellum exerts on the primary motor cortex (M1). CBI can be indexed via a dual-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, whereby a conditioning stimulus (CS) is delivered to the cerebellum in advance of a test stimulus (TS) to M1. The CS is typically delivered at intensities over 60% maximum stimulus output (MSO) via a double-cone coil. This is reportedly uncomfortable for participants, reducing the reliability and validity of outcomes. This feasibility study investigates the reliability and tolerability of eliciting CBI across a range of CS intensities using both a double-cone and high-powered figure-of-8 coil, the D70. It was expected that the double-cone coil would elicit CBI at intensities upwards of 60%MSO. The range for the D70 coil was exploratory. The double-cone coil was expected to be less tolerable than the D70 coil. CBI was assessed in 13 participants (25.92 ± 5.42 years, six female) using each coil (randomized) over intensities 40, 50, 60, 70, 80%MSO. Tolerability was assessed via visual analog scales. Comparisons across intensities and tolerability were assessed non-parametrically and via a linear model. The double-cone coil elicited CBI at intensities 60, 70, and 80%MSO (p < .05), with suppression elicited at 60%MSO not significantly different to that at higher intensities. CBI was not reliably elicited by the D70 coil at any intensity. The double-cone coil was significantly less tolerable than the D70. A CS of 60%MSO with a double-cone coil provides a balance between the reliability and tolerability of CBI.

摘要

小脑脑抑制(CBI)描述了小脑对初级运动皮层(M1)施加的抑制性紧张度。CBI 可以通过双线圈经颅磁刺激方案进行索引,其中在对 M1 施加测试刺激(TS)之前,将条件刺激(CS)施加到小脑。CS 通常通过双锥线圈以超过最大刺激输出(MSO)的 60%的强度传递。据报道,这对参与者来说很不舒服,降低了结果的可靠性和有效性。这项可行性研究使用双锥线圈和高功率的 8 字形线圈(D70)在一系列 CS 强度下,研究了引发 CBI 的可靠性和耐受性。预计双锥线圈将在超过 60%MSO 的强度下引发 CBI。D70 线圈的范围是探索性的。预计双锥线圈的耐受性不如 D70 线圈。使用每个线圈(随机),在 40、50、60、70、80%MSO 强度下,对 13 名参与者(25.92±5.42 岁,6 名女性)评估 CBI。通过视觉模拟量表评估耐受性。非参数和线性模型评估了跨强度和耐受性的比较。双锥线圈在 60、70 和 80%MSO 强度下引发了 CBI(p<.05),60%MSO 下引发的抑制与更高强度下的抑制无显著差异。D70 线圈在任何强度下均无法可靠地引发 CBI。双锥线圈的耐受性明显低于 D70。双锥线圈的 60%MSO CS 在 CBI 的可靠性和耐受性之间提供了平衡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验