Londono Tobon Amalia, Reed Margot O, Taylor Jerome H, Bloch Michael H
1 Yale Child Study Center , New Haven, Connecticut.
2 Yale Department of Psychiatry, Yale University , New Haven, Connecticut.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018 Jul/Aug;28(6):368-378. doi: 10.1089/cap.2017.0160. Epub 2018 May 9.
School refusal is an important pediatric problem with significant negative short- and long-term outcomes. Specific psychosocial treatments appear effective in reducing school refusal, but many children do not respond to these treatments. Although systematic reviews have examined the efficacy of psychological interventions for school refusal, no systematic reviews on pharmacological interventions exist.
We conducted a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental pharmacologic trials in children and adolescents with school refusal reported in English or Spanish until July 1, 2017. Two authors screened study titles and abstracts for eligibility. Data regarding the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes for each trial were extracted and reported. Effect sizes for school attendance are presented.
The search identified 6 articles, including 7 trials (6 RCTs and 1 open label) and 306 youths. Pharmacologic treatments investigated for school refusal included antidepressants (imipramine, clomipramine, and fluoxetine) and benzodiazepines (alprazolam). All pharmacotherapies studied had pretreatment to posttreatment improvements on school refusal, depression, and anxiety symptoms. However, included trials were severely underpowered and did not demonstrate significant improvement compared to placebo.
Data regarding pharmacological treatments for school refusal are sparse. Most trials in this area were conducted before development of newer antidepressants, were underpowered, and have significant methodological limitations that are characteristic of the time in which they were conducted. This systematic review highlights the need for more trials with newer pharmacologic agents, larger sample sizes, and improved systematic assessments of school refusal and comorbidities. School refusal represents an important functional outcome for many children, especially those with anxiety and depression. Future pharmacologic studies of anxiety and depression in children may benefit from incorporating specific school refusal measures as secondary outcomes.
学校拒学是一个重要的儿科问题,会产生严重的短期和长期负面后果。特定的心理社会治疗方法似乎能有效减少学校拒学现象,但许多儿童对这些治疗没有反应。尽管已有系统评价探讨了针对学校拒学的心理干预效果,但尚无关于药物干预的系统评价。
我们对MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Scopus和Embase进行了全面的文献检索,以查找截至2017年7月1日以英文或西班牙文报道的关于患有学校拒学的儿童和青少年的随机对照试验(RCT)或准实验性药物试验。两位作者筛选研究标题和摘要以确定其是否符合纳入标准。提取并报告了每个试验的人群、干预措施、对照和结果的数据。给出了上学出勤率的效应量。
检索共识别出6篇文章,包括7项试验(6项RCT和1项开放标签试验)以及306名青少年。针对学校拒学研究的药物治疗包括抗抑郁药(丙咪嗪、氯米帕明和氟西汀)和苯二氮䓬类药物(阿普唑仑)。所有研究的药物治疗在治疗前至治疗后对学校拒学、抑郁和焦虑症状均有改善。然而,纳入的试验样本量严重不足,与安慰剂相比未显示出显著改善。
关于学校拒学药物治疗的数据稀少。该领域的大多数试验是在新型抗抑郁药研发之前进行的,样本量不足,且存在其开展时期所特有的重大方法学局限性。本系统评价强调需要开展更多使用新型药物、更大样本量以及对学校拒学和共病进行改进的系统评估的试验。学校拒学对许多儿童来说是一个重要的功能结局,尤其是那些患有焦虑和抑郁的儿童。未来儿童焦虑和抑郁的药物研究可能会受益于将特定的学校拒学测量指标作为次要结局纳入研究。