Fornander Mirae J, Kearney Christopher A
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 21;10:3079. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03079. eCollection 2019.
School attendance problems are highly prevalent worldwide, leading researchers to investigate many different risk factors for this population. Of considerable controversy is how internalizing behavior problems might help to distinguish different types of youth with school attendance problems. In addition, efforts are ongoing to identify the point at which children and adolescents move from appropriate school attendance to problematic school absenteeism. The present study utilized ensemble and classification and regression tree analysis to identify potential internalizing behavior risk factors among youth at different levels of school absenteeism severity (i.e., 1+%, 3+%, 5+%, 10+%). Higher levels of absenteeism were also examined on an exploratory basis. Participants included 160 youth aged 6-19 years ( = 13.7; SD = 2.9) and their families from an outpatient therapy clinic (39.4%) and community (60.6%) setting, the latter from a family court and truancy diversion program cohort. One particular item relating to lack of enjoyment was most predictive of absenteeism severity at different levels, though not among the highest levels. Other internalizing items were also predictive of various levels of absenteeism severity, but only in a negatively endorsed fashion. Internalizing symptoms of worry and fatigue tended to be endorsed higher across less severe and more severe absenteeism severity levels. A general expectation that predictors would tend to be more homogeneous at higher than lower levels of absenteeism severity was not generally supported. The results help confirm the difficulty of conceptualizing this population based on forms of behavior but may support the need for early warning sign screening for youth at risk for school attendance problems.
上学出勤问题在全球范围内极为普遍,这促使研究人员对该人群的诸多不同风险因素展开调查。内化行为问题如何有助于区分不同类型的上学出勤存在问题的青少年,这引发了相当大的争议。此外,人们正在努力确定儿童和青少年从正常上学出勤转变为有问题的旷课的临界点。本研究运用集成学习以及分类与回归树分析,以识别不同旷课严重程度水平(即1%以上、3%以上、5%以上、10%以上)的青少年中潜在的内化行为风险因素。还对更高旷课水平进行了探索性研究。参与者包括160名6至19岁的青少年(平均年龄=13.7岁;标准差=2.9岁)及其来自门诊治疗诊所(39.4%)和社区(60.6%)环境的家庭,后者来自家庭法庭和逃学转移项目队列。一个与缺乏乐趣相关的特定项目在不同水平上最能预测旷课严重程度,不过在最高水平中并非如此。其他内化项目也能预测不同程度的旷课严重程度,但只是以负面认可的方式。担忧和疲劳的内化症状在旷课严重程度较低和较高水平上往往得到更高的认可。关于预测因素在旷课严重程度较高水平上往往比在较低水平上更具同质性的普遍预期,总体上未得到支持。研究结果有助于证实基于行为形式对这一人群进行概念化的困难,但可能支持对有上学出勤问题风险的青少年进行早期预警信号筛查的必要性。