• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

演示全球剖宫产率模型(C 模型)和 Robson 分类法在估计和描述机构性剖宫产术过剩数量方面的应用。

Demonstration of the application of the global cesarean section rate model (C-Model) and the Robson Classification to estimate and characterize excess numbers of institutional c-sections.

机构信息

Centro Nacer, Salud Sexual y Reproductiva, adscrito al Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia de la Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín (Colombia)..

出版信息

Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2021 Dec 30;72(4):396-406. doi: 10.18597/rcog.3649.

DOI:10.18597/rcog.3649
PMID:35134286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8833240/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To carry out an academic exercise based on real local data regarding the application of the C-Model v1.0 to determine how data are gathered and used to generate the model, how the model is applied in order to identify potential excess numbers of cesarean sections in an institution, and when identified, how the model is applied to distribute deliveries according to the Robson Classification system and explain excess numbers.

METHODOLOGY

The standardized ratio and absolute difference between the observed proportion and the expected probability of c-sections according to the C-Model v1.0 were estimated for each institution using real databases of five hospitals in Colombia. Convenience selection was used to meet the objectives. Based on the assumptions underpinning group distributions according to the Robson classification, proposed explanations for excess numbers and differences among institutions are presented.

RESULTS

Applying the C-Model, the c-section standardized ratio identified different excess numbers of the procedure in the presence of similar institutional c-section proportions. Important variability was found in the proportion of c-sections among women with similar clinical and obstetric characteristics, which might explain the excess numbers identified.

CONCLUSION

The C-Model allows to estimate expected c-section proportions according to the specific characteristics of the women seen at each institution; their distribution according to the Robson Classification is a way to explore the origin and particulars of those differences.

摘要

目的

基于真实的本地数据,开展一项关于 C-Model v1.0 应用的学术研究,以了解如何收集和使用数据来生成模型,如何应用模型以识别机构中潜在的剖宫产过多,以及在识别出模型后,如何根据 Robson 分类系统应用模型来分配分娩,并解释过多的原因。

方法

使用哥伦比亚五家医院的真实数据库,对每个机构的 C-Model v1.0 进行标准化比值和实际比例与模型预期概率之间的绝对差异估计。采用方便抽样来满足目标。根据 Robson 分类分组分布的假设,提出了对过多数量和机构间差异的解释。

结果

应用 C-Model,在机构剖宫产比例相似的情况下,识别出手术的标准化剖宫产率存在不同的过多数量。具有相似临床和产科特征的女性中剖宫产比例存在重要差异,这可能解释了识别出的过多数量。

结论

C-Model 允许根据每个机构所见女性的具体特征来估计预期的剖宫产比例;根据 Robson 分类进行分布是探索这些差异的起源和特点的一种方法。

相似文献

1
Demonstration of the application of the global cesarean section rate model (C-Model) and the Robson Classification to estimate and characterize excess numbers of institutional c-sections.演示全球剖宫产率模型(C 模型)和 Robson 分类法在估计和描述机构性剖宫产术过剩数量方面的应用。
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2021 Dec 30;72(4):396-406. doi: 10.18597/rcog.3649.
2
Use of ten-group Robson Classification in Türkiye to discuss cesarean section trends.土耳其使用十组 Robson 分类法探讨剖宫产趋势。
Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug;75(4):333-339. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05154-5. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
3
Cesarean sections in Brazil's teaching hospitals: an analysis using Robson Classification.巴西教学医院的剖宫产手术:一项使用罗布森分类法的分析
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Feb 26;45:e16. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.16. eCollection 2021.
4
[Cesarean sections in the Centre-Val de Loire region: Practices and indications-the Robson Classification].[卢瓦尔河谷中心地区的剖宫产手术:操作与指征——罗布森分类法]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2020 Aug;68(4):253-259. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
5
Crude and adjusted comparisons of cesarean delivery rates using the Robson classification: A population-based cohort study in Canada and Sweden, 2004 to 2016.采用 Robson 分类法对剖宫产率进行的粗比较和调整后比较:2004 年至 2016 年加拿大和瑞典的基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Aug 1;19(8):e1004077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004077. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
An analysis of the high cesarean section rates in Turkey by Robson classification.对土耳其按罗伯逊分类法分析的高剖宫产率。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Aug;34(16):2682-2692. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1670806. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
7
Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys.利用 Robson 分类评估 21 个国家的剖宫产趋势:两项世卫组织多国家调查的二次分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 May;3(5):e260-70. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
8
[Incidencia de la operación cesárea según la clasificación de Robson en el Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia del Hospital Gral. Dr. Fernando Quiroz Gutiérrez del Instituto de Seguridad Social al Servicio de los Trabajadores del Estado].[根据罗布森分类法,在社会保障局下属的费尔南多·基罗斯·古铁雷斯博士综合医院妇产科对国家劳动者服务的剖宫产发生率]
Cir Cir. 2018;86(3):261-269. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.M18000044.
9
Analysis of Cesarean section delivery at Nova Bila Hospital according to the Robson classification.根据罗布森分类法对新比拉医院剖宫产分娩情况的分析。
Coll Antropol. 2015 Mar;39(1):145-50.
10
Improving the Caesarean Decision by Robson Classification: A Population-Based Study by 5,323,500 Livebirth Data.通过 Robson 分类改善剖宫产决策:基于 5323500 例活产数据的一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Glob Health. 2020 Aug 17;86(1):101. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2615.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital-Level Variation in the Frequency of Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Who Undergo Labor Induction.医院层面上,行引产的初产妇行剖宫产的频率存在差异。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;136(6):1179-1189. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004139.
2
Impact of clinical audits on cesarean section rate in a Spanish hospital: Analysis of 6 year data according to the Robson classification.临床审计对西班牙一家医院剖宫产率的影响:根据罗布森分类法对6年数据的分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Nov;254:308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Cesarean section one hundred years 1920-2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly.剖宫产100年(1920 - 2020):好、坏与丑
J Perinat Med. 2020 Sep 4;49(1):5-16. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0305.
4
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.全球剖宫产使用情况及差异的流行病学研究。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
5
FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic.国际妇产科联盟立场文件:如何遏制剖宫产流行趋势
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1286-1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32113-5.
6
Do provider birth attitudes influence cesarean delivery rate: a cross-sectional study.医生的分娩态度是否会影响剖宫产率:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 29;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1756-7.
7
Variation in the Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Cesarean Delivery Rate.初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产率的变化。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;131(6):1039-1048. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002636.
8
Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review.利用罗伯逊分类法进行审核和反馈以降低剖宫产率:系统评价。
BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14774. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
9
Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality.剖宫产率与母婴死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2015 Dec 1;314(21):2263-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15553.
10
A global reference for caesarean section rates (C-Model): a multicountry cross-sectional study.剖宫产率的全球参考标准(C模型):一项多国横断面研究。
BJOG. 2016 Feb;123(3):427-36. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13509. Epub 2015 Aug 10.