Suppr超能文献

从多维视角评估城市绿地结构及其质量。

Assessment of urban green space structures and their quality from a multidimensional perspective.

机构信息

Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Human-Computer Interaction Center, Chair for Communication Science, RWTH Aachen University, Campus Boulevard 57, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2018 Feb 15;615:1364-1378. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.167. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

Abstract

Facing the growing amount of people living in cities and, at the same time, the need for a compact and sustainable urban development to mitigate urban sprawl, it becomes increasingly important that green spaces in compact cities are designed to meet the various needs within an urban environment. Urban green spaces have a multitude of functions: Maintaining ecological processes and resulting services, e.g. providing habitat for animals and plants, providing a beneficial city microclimate as well as recreational space for citizens. Regarding these requirements, currently existing assessment procedures for green spaces have some major shortcomings, which are discussed in this paper. It is argued why a more detailed spatial level as well as a distinction between natural and artificial varieties of structural elements is justified and needed and how the assessment of urban green spaces benefits from the multidimensional perspective that is applied. By analyzing a selection of structural elements from an ecological, microclimatic and social perspective, indicator values are derived and a new, holistic metrics is proposed. The results of the integrated analysis led to two major findings: first, that for some elements, the evaluation differs to a great extent between the different perspectives (disciplines) and second, that natural and artificial varieties are, in most cases, evaluated considerably different from each other. The differences between the perspectives call for an integrative planning policy which acknowledges the varying contribution of a structural element to different purposes (ecological, microclimatic, social) as well as a discussion about the prioritization of those purposes. The differences in the evaluation of natural vs. artificial elements verify the assumption that indicators which consider only generic elements fail to account for those refinements and are thus less suitable for planning and assessment purposes. Implications, challenges and scenarios for the application of such a metrics are finally discussed.

摘要

面对城市中不断增长的人口数量,同时为了缓解城市扩张,紧凑和可持续的城市发展变得越来越重要,因此需要设计紧凑城市中的绿色空间来满足城市环境中的各种需求。城市绿地具有多种功能:维持生态过程和产生的服务,例如为动植物提供栖息地,提供有益的城市小气候以及为市民提供娱乐空间。关于这些要求,目前现有的绿地评估程序存在一些重大缺陷,本文对此进行了讨论。本文论证了为什么更详细的空间水平以及区分自然和人工结构元素种类是合理且必要的,以及为什么从应用的多维角度来看,城市绿地的评估会受益。通过从生态、小气候和社会角度分析选择的结构元素,得出了指标值,并提出了一种新的整体指标。综合分析的结果得出了两个主要发现:首先,对于某些元素,不同视角(学科)之间的评估差异很大;其次,自然和人工种类在大多数情况下彼此之间的评估差异很大。视角之间的差异需要综合规划政策,承认结构元素对不同目的(生态、小气候、社会)的不同贡献,并讨论这些目的的优先级。自然与人工元素评估之间的差异验证了这样一个假设,即仅考虑通用元素的指标无法考虑到这些细化,因此不太适合规划和评估目的。最后讨论了这种指标的应用的影响、挑战和情景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验