Suppr超能文献

大隐静脉导管泡沫硬化疗法和静脉曲张剥脱术后使用23毫米汞柱或35毫米汞柱弹力袜压迫:一项随机对照研究。

Compression with 23 mmHg or 35 mmHg stockings after saphenous catheter foam sclerotherapy and phlebectomy of varicose veins: A randomized controlled study.

作者信息

Cavezzi Attilio, Mosti Giovanni, Colucci Roberto, Quinzi Valentina, Bastiani Luca, Urso Simone U

机构信息

1 Eurocenter Venalinfa, S. Benedetto del Tronto (AP), Italy.

2 Angiology Department, Clinica Barbantini, Lucca, Italy.

出版信息

Phlebology. 2019 Mar;34(2):98-106. doi: 10.1177/0268355518776127. Epub 2018 May 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare two different medical compression stockings after varicose vein treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomized single-blind controlled study on two compression regimes after saphenous catheter foam sclerotherapy + phlebectomy was performed. After pads and 5 mmHg contention sock, 23 mmHg (group A, Struva 23®) or 35 mmHg (group B, Struva 35®) medical compression stocking was applied 24 h/day for seven days; subsequently 21-23 mmHg medical compression stocking in daytime. Symptoms, compliance, skin findings, and bioimpedance spectroscopy parameters were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients (48 and 49 limbs in groups A and B, respectively) were enrolled. Three (T3) and seven (T7) days post-operatively, most symptoms were significantly milder in group B, especially pain and heaviness at T7 and at day 40 (T40). Ambulation, medical compression stocking stability/tolerability and skin healing were significantly better in group B, with p = 0.046, 0.021/0.060, and 0.010, respectively, at T7. Bioimpedance parameters increased at T7 and decreased at T40 in both groups; leg reactance and limb L-Dex improved in group B at T7 and T40, respectively (p = 0.039 and 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Compression with 23 and 35 mmHg medical compression stocking after catheter foam sclerotherapy + phlebectomy was effective and well tolerated at immediate/short term. Compression with 35 mmHg medical compression stocking provided less adverse post-operative symptoms and better tissue healing. Bioimpedance results confirmed a slightly better edema improvement with 35 mmHg medical compression stocking.

摘要

目的

比较两种不同的医用压力袜在静脉曲张治疗后的效果。

患者与方法

对大隐静脉导管泡沫硬化疗法联合静脉切除术之后的两种压力治疗方案进行了一项随机单盲对照研究。在使用衬垫和5 mmHg的弹力袜之后,A组(Struva 23®)应用23 mmHg的医用压力袜,B组(Struva 35®)应用35 mmHg的医用压力袜,每天24小时使用,持续7天;随后白天使用21 - 23 mmHg的医用压力袜。评估症状、依从性、皮肤状况以及生物电阻抗光谱参数。

结果

共纳入94例患者(A组和B组分别为48例和49例肢体)。术后第3天(T3)和第7天(T7),B组的大多数症状明显较轻,尤其是T7以及第40天(T40)时的疼痛和沉重感。在T7时,B组的行走能力、医用压力袜的稳定性/耐受性以及皮肤愈合情况明显更好,p值分别为0.046、0.021/0.060和0.010。两组的生物电阻抗参数在T7时升高,在T40时降低;B组的腿部电抗和肢体L - Dex分别在T7和T40时得到改善(p值分别为0.039和0.012)。

结论

导管泡沫硬化疗法联合静脉切除术后使用23 mmHg和35 mmHg的医用压力袜在即刻/短期是有效且耐受性良好的。使用35 mmHg的医用压力袜术后不良反应症状更少,组织愈合更好。生物电阻抗结果证实35 mmHg的医用压力袜在改善水肿方面略胜一筹。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验