Suppr超能文献

ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍诊断标准的临床意义。

Clinical implications of the proposed ICD-11 PTSD diagnostic criteria.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry,New York University School of Medicine,1 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016,USA.

School of Psychology, University of New South Wales,Sydney, NSW, 2052,Australia.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2019 Feb;49(3):483-490. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718001101. Epub 2018 May 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Projected changes to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnostic criteria in the upcoming International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 may affect the prevalence and severity of identified cases. This study examined differences in rates, severity, and overlap of diagnoses using ICD-10 and ICD-11 PTSD diagnostic criteria during consecutive assessments of recent survivors of traumatic events.

METHODS

The study sample comprised 3863 survivors of traumatic events, evaluated in 11 longitudinal studies of PTSD. ICD-10 and ICD-11 diagnostic rules were applied to the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) to derive ICD-10 and ICD-11 diagnoses at different time intervals between trauma occurrence and 15 months.

RESULTS

The ICD-11 criteria identified fewer cases than the ICD-10 across assessment intervals (range -47.09% to -57.14%). Over 97% of ICD-11 PTSD cases met concurrent ICD-10 PTSD criteria. PTSD symptom severity of individuals identified by the ICD-11 criteria (CAPS total scores) was 31.38-36.49% higher than those identified by ICD-10 criteria alone. The latter, however, had CAPS scores indicative of moderate PTSD. ICD-11 was associated with similar or higher rates of comorbid mood and anxiety disorders. Individuals identified by either ICD-10 or ICD-11 shortly after traumatic events had similar longitudinal course.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that significantly fewer individuals would be diagnosed with PTSD using the proposed ICD-11 criteria. Though ICD-11 criteria identify more severe cases, those meeting ICD-10 but not ICD-11 criteria remain in the moderate range of PTSD symptoms. Use of ICD-11 criteria will have critical implications for case identification in clinical practice, national reporting, and research.

摘要

背景

即将发布的《国际疾病分类》(ICD-11)中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)诊断标准的预计变化可能会影响已识别病例的患病率和严重程度。本研究使用 ICD-10 和 ICD-11 PTSD 诊断标准,在连续评估创伤后近期幸存者时,检查了不同诊断率、严重程度和重叠诊断的差异。

方法

研究样本包括 3863 名创伤事件幸存者,他们参与了 PTSD 的 11 项纵向研究。使用《临床医生管理 PTSD 量表》(CAPS)应用 ICD-10 和 ICD-11 诊断规则,从创伤发生到 15 个月的不同时间间隔得出 ICD-10 和 ICD-11 诊断。

结果

在评估间隔内,ICD-11 标准识别的病例数少于 ICD-10(范围为-47.09%至-57.14%)。超过 97%的 ICD-11 PTSD 病例符合同时存在的 ICD-10 PTSD 标准。ICD-11 标准识别的 PTSD 症状严重程度(CAPS 总分)比仅使用 ICD-10 标准识别的个体高 31.38%-36.49%。然而,后者的 CAPS 分数表明存在中度 PTSD。ICD-11 与类似或更高的共患心境和焦虑障碍发生率相关。在创伤后不久,使用任何一种 ICD-10 或 ICD-11 标准识别的个体都具有相似的纵向病程。

结论

本研究表明,使用拟议的 ICD-11 标准,诊断 PTSD 的个体数量会显著减少。虽然 ICD-11 标准识别出更严重的病例,但符合 ICD-10 但不符合 ICD-11 标准的病例仍处于 PTSD 症状的中度范围内。ICD-11 标准的使用将对临床实践、国家报告和研究中的病例识别产生重大影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b16/6331687/bd6cf60584e4/S0033291718001101_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验