• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际创伤问卷在台湾地区的心理测量特性

The Psychometric Properties of the International Trauma Questionnaire in Taiwan.

作者信息

Chiu Shih-Han, Chiu Yu-Lung, Yeh Chin-Bin

机构信息

Department of Counseling and Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Ming Chuan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023 Mar 1;33(1):28-37. doi: 10.5152/pcp.2023.22572. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.5152/pcp.2023.22572
PMID:38764532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11082618/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complex post-traumatic stress disorder was often present after chronic traumatic events. The diagnostic criteria of complex post-traumatic disorder consisted of both post-traumatic stress disorder and disturbance in self-organization. People with complex post-traumatic disorder often exposed to chronic stress. It might not be as significant as the major traumatic event as survivors with post-traumatic stress disorder had experienced. Therefore, the impact of complex post-traumatic stress disorder was often ignored. It is critical to identify the at-risk individuals with complex post-traumatic disorder in community. We planned to investigate the psychometrics of the International Trauma Questionnaire for assessing complex post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in Taiwan.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-one individuals were enrolled and they completed 8 self-report scales, including International Trauma Questionnaire, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire Short Form, Beck Depression Inventory-II, Beck Anxiety Inventory, the Chinese version of the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5, Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Interpersonal Relationship Scale. The psychometric of International Trauma Questionnaire was examined by bivariate correlation analysis, independent -test, and factor analysis.

RESULTS

The study showed International Trauma Questionnaire had good reliability and validity and corresponded with previous studies. The result of confirmatory factor analysis supported the structure of complex post-traumatic stress disorder criteria in International Classification of Diseases-11. The 2-factor second-order model was the best-fitting model. The 6 symptom domains of complex post-traumatic stress disorder were also significantly correlated with depressive and anxiety symptoms.

CONCLUSION

It suggests that the Chinese version of International Trauma Questionnaire could be used for screening at-risk groups and future works for mental public health in Taiwan.

摘要

背景

复杂创伤后应激障碍常出现在慢性创伤事件之后。复杂创伤后应激障碍的诊断标准包括创伤后应激障碍和自我组织紊乱。患有复杂创伤后应激障碍的人常暴露于慢性应激之下。这种应激可能不像创伤后应激障碍幸存者所经历的重大创伤事件那样显著。因此,复杂创伤后应激障碍的影响常常被忽视。在社区中识别患有复杂创伤后应激障碍的高危个体至关重要。我们计划调查国际创伤问卷在评估台湾地区复杂创伤后应激障碍症状方面的心理测量学特性。

方法

招募了121名个体,他们完成了8份自我报告量表,包括国际创伤问卷、儿童创伤问卷简版、贝克抑郁量表第二版、贝克焦虑量表、DSM - 5创伤后应激障碍检查表中文版、情绪调节困难量表、罗森伯格自尊量表和人际关系量表。通过双变量相关分析、独立样本t检验和因子分析来检验国际创伤问卷的心理测量学特性。

结果

研究表明国际创伤问卷具有良好的信度和效度,与先前的研究结果相符。验证性因子分析的结果支持了国际疾病分类第11版中复杂创伤后应激障碍标准的结构。二因素二阶模型是最佳拟合模型。复杂创伤后应激障碍的6个症状领域也与抑郁和焦虑症状显著相关。

结论

这表明国际创伤问卷中文版可用于台湾地区高危人群的筛查以及未来的精神公共卫生工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb9b/11082618/e0cde04564ad/pcp-33-1-28_S001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb9b/11082618/e79f25b50b42/pcp-33-1-28_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb9b/11082618/e0cde04564ad/pcp-33-1-28_S001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb9b/11082618/e79f25b50b42/pcp-33-1-28_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb9b/11082618/e0cde04564ad/pcp-33-1-28_S001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Psychometric Properties of the International Trauma Questionnaire in Taiwan.国际创伤问卷在台湾地区的心理测量特性
Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023 Mar 1;33(1):28-37. doi: 10.5152/pcp.2023.22572. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder in mental health support-seeking former-serving Australian defence force veterans.精神健康支持服务中寻求帮助的前澳大利亚国防军退伍军人的 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2024 May;58(5):416-424. doi: 10.1177/00048674241230197. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
3
Interventions for adults with a history of complex traumatic events: the INCiTE mixed-methods systematic review.干预成年人创伤后复杂经历:INCiTE 混合方法系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(43):1-312. doi: 10.3310/hta24430.
4
[Evaluation of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: validation of a measure, the PCLS].[创伤后应激障碍的评估:一种测量工具——创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCLS)的效度验证]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):232-8.
5
Measuring post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder using the International Trauma Questionnaire: results from a Hungarian clinical and non-clinical sample.使用国际创伤问卷测量创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍:来自匈牙利临床和非临床样本的结果。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2152929. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2152929.
6
Psychometric properties and validity of the German version of the Post-Traumatic Diagnostic Scale for DSM-5 (PDS-5).《DSM-5 创伤后诊断量表(PDS-5)德文版的心理测量特性和效度》。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Sep 24;12(1):1965339. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1965339. eCollection 2021.
7
[Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a consequence of the interaction between an individual genetic susceptibility, a traumatogenic event and a social context].[创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)作为个体遗传易感性、创伤性事件和社会环境之间相互作用的结果]
Encephale. 2012 Oct;38(5):373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
8
Psychometric properties of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) examined in a Norwegian trauma-exposed clinical sample.在挪威遭受创伤的临床样本中对国际创伤问卷(ITQ)的心理测量特性进行了检验。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Aug 14;11(1):1796187. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1796187.
9
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Symptom Checklist-Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Scale.《症状清单-创伤后应激障碍量表》韩文版的信效度
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 May;31(5):777-82. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.777. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
10
Measuring symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder in people with intellectual disabilities: the development and psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale-Intellectual Disabilities (IES-IDs).测量智力残疾者创伤后应激障碍症状:事件影响量表-智力残疾版(IES-IDs)的编制与心理测量学特性。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2014 Sep;53(3):315-32. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12048. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Childhood Maltreatment Associated with Anxiety and Depression and Complex PTSD Symptoms.童年期虐待与焦虑、抑郁及复杂性创伤后应激障碍症状相关。
Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Sep 1;34(3):201-209. doi: 10.5152/pcp.2024.24842. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring complex-PTSD comorbidity in trauma-exposed Northern Ireland veterans.探讨创伤后应激障碍共病的复杂性在创伤暴露的北爱尔兰退伍军人中。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Mar 31;13(1):2046953. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2046953. eCollection 2022.
2
Prediction of posttraumatic stress disorder by acute stress disorder in traffic accident survivors.交通事故幸存者的急性应激障碍预测创伤后应激障碍。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Oct;51(5):2502-2509. doi: 10.3906/sag-2008-282. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
3
Differences between ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD on DSM-5 section III personality traits.
国际疾病分类第11版创伤后应激障碍(ICD - 11 PTSD)与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版第三部分人格特质中的复杂性创伤后应激障碍(complex PTSD)之间的差异。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Apr 13;12(1):1894805. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1894805.
4
A systematic literature review of factor analytic and mixture models of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.采用国际创伤问卷对 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的因子分析和混合模型的系统文献回顾。
J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Apr;79:102381. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102381. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
5
Factor structure and symptom classes of ICD-11 complex posttraumatic stress disorder in a South Korean general population sample with adverse childhood experiences.在具有童年不良经历的韩国普通人群样本中,国际疾病分类第11版复杂性创伤后应激障碍的因子结构和症状类别
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Apr;114:104982. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.104982. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
6
Using the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 to Screen for PTSD in the Chinese Context: A Pilot Study in a Psychiatric Sample.在中国背景下使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)检查表筛查PTSD:一项针对精神科样本的初步研究
J Evid Based Soc Work (2019). 2019 Nov-Dec;16(6):643-651. doi: 10.1080/26408066.2019.1676858. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
7
Same same but different? DSM-5 versus ICD-11 PTSD among traumatized refugees in Germany.相同又不同?德国创伤后应激障碍难民的 DSM-5 与 ICD-11 比较。
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Jul;134:110129. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110129. Epub 2020 May 5.
8
The validity of ICD-11 PTSD and Complex PTSD in East Asian cultures: findings with young adults from China, Hong Kong, Japan, and Taiwan.《国际疾病分类第11版》中创伤后应激障碍及复杂性创伤后应激障碍在东亚文化中的有效性:来自中国内地、中国香港、日本和中国台湾地区年轻人的研究结果
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Jan 30;11(1):1717826. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1717826. eCollection 2020.
9
Validation of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in foster children using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷对寄养儿童的 ICD-11 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 进行验证。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Jan;141(1):60-73. doi: 10.1111/acps.13100. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
10
Translation and validation of the Chinese ICD-11 International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) for the Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD).用于评估创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的中文版国际创伤问卷(ITQ)的翻译与验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 May 15;10(1):1608718. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1608718. eCollection 2019.