• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从国际视角定义 PTSD 及相关障碍:对 Friedman(2013)的评论。

Applying an international perspective in defining PTSD and related disorders: comment on Friedman (2013).

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Trauma Stress. 2013 Oct;26(5):560-2. doi: 10.1002/jts.21852.

DOI:10.1002/jts.21852
PMID:24151003
Abstract

We address the general perspective of the World Health Organization towards the classification process of the 11(th) revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11); give a short description of the ICD-11 proposals related to "disorders specifically associated with stress" and the differentiation between posttraumatic stress disorder, complex posttraumatic stress disorder, and prolonged grief disorder; and comment on the most important aim of classifying mental disorders-to provide the best treatments available.

摘要

我们探讨了世界卫生组织对国际疾病分类第 11 次修订版(ICD-11)分类过程的总体看法;简要描述了与“与压力特别相关的障碍”相关的 ICD-11 提案,以及创伤后应激障碍、复杂型创伤后应激障碍和持久性哀伤障碍之间的区别;并就精神障碍分类的最重要目标——提供现有最佳治疗方案——进行了评论。

相似文献

1
Applying an international perspective in defining PTSD and related disorders: comment on Friedman (2013).从国际视角定义 PTSD 及相关障碍:对 Friedman(2013)的评论。
J Trauma Stress. 2013 Oct;26(5):560-2. doi: 10.1002/jts.21852.
2
"I wouldn't start from here"--an alternative perspective on PTSD from the ICD-11: comment on Friedman (2013).“我不会从这里开始”——从 ICD-11 看创伤后应激障碍的另一种视角:对 Friedman(2013)的评论。
J Trauma Stress. 2013 Oct;26(5):557-9. doi: 10.1002/jts.21843.
3
The DSM-5 got PTSD right: comment on Friedman (2013).DSM-5 对创伤后应激障碍的诊断是正确的:对 Friedman(2013)的评论。
J Trauma Stress. 2013 Oct;26(5):563-6. doi: 10.1002/jts.21844.
4
Validation of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷验证创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Sep;136(3):313-322. doi: 10.1111/acps.12771. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
5
PTSD in the DSM-5: reply to Brewin (2013), Kilpatrick (2013), and Maercker and Perkonigg (2013).DSM-5 中的创伤后应激障碍:对 Brewin(2013)、Kilpatrick(2013)和 Maercker 与 Perkonigg(2013)的回应。
J Trauma Stress. 2013 Oct;26(5):567-9. doi: 10.1002/jts.21847.
6
Consequences of the Diagnostic Criteria Proposed for the ICD-11 on the Prevalence of PTSD in Children and Adolescents.《国际疾病分类第11版》提议的诊断标准对儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍患病率的影响
J Trauma Stress. 2016 Apr;29(2):120-3. doi: 10.1002/jts.22080. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
7
An evaluation of ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder criteria in two samples of adolescents and young adults exposed to mass shootings: factor analysis and comparisons to ICD-10 and DSM-IV.对遭受大规模枪击事件的青少年和青年两个样本中ICD - 11创伤后应激障碍标准的评估:因素分析以及与ICD - 10和DSM - IV的比较
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 12;16:140. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0849-y.
8
Complex PTSD is on the trauma spectrum: comment on Resick et al. (2012).复杂性创伤后应激障碍处于创伤谱系中:对 Resick 等人(2012 年)的评论。
J Trauma Stress. 2012 Jun;25(3):254-5; discussion on 260-3. doi: 10.1002/jts.21695.
9
Network models of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder: Implications for ICD-11.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍的网络模型:对《国际疾病分类》第11版的启示
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Apr;126(3):355-366. doi: 10.1037/abn0000252. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
10
The structure of post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder amongst West Papuan refugees.西巴布亚难民中创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍的结构
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 May 7;15:111. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0480-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploratory factor analysis of post traumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5: investigating post traumatic stress disorder interconnected dynamics with depression and anxiety in the aftermath of multiple collective stressors.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍检查表的探索性因素分析:调查多重集体应激源后创伤后应激障碍与抑郁和焦虑的相互关联动态
PLoS One. 2025 May 8;20(5):e0323422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323422. eCollection 2025.
2
Changes in Spousal Intimacy in Women Suffering Trauma Symptoms from Domestic Abuse: A Culturally Embedded Intervention Study in Pakistan.遭受家暴创伤症状的女性中配偶亲密关系的变化:巴基斯坦一项文化嵌入干预研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Aug 8;21(8):1045. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081045.
3
Possible Role for Imagery-Based Therapy in Managing PTSD in Pakistani Women Experiencing Domestic Abuse: A Pilot Study Using Eidetic Therapy.基于意象的疗法在管理遭受家庭虐待的巴基斯坦女性创伤后应激障碍中的潜在作用:一项使用遗觉象疗法的初步研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 3;18(5):2478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052478.
4
Rethinking Addiction.重新思考成瘾问题。
Glob Pediatr Health. 2019 Jan 23;6:2333794X18821943. doi: 10.1177/2333794X18821943. eCollection 2019.
5
Clinical implications of the proposed ICD-11 PTSD diagnostic criteria.ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍诊断标准的临床意义。
Psychol Med. 2019 Feb;49(3):483-490. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718001101. Epub 2018 May 14.
6
PTSD or not PTSD? Comparing the proposed ICD-11 and the DSM-5 PTSD criteria among young survivors of the 2011 Norway attacks and their parents.创伤后应激障碍与否?比较2011年挪威袭击事件年轻幸存者及其父母中拟议的国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)创伤后应激障碍标准。
Psychol Med. 2017 May;47(7):1283-1291. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002968. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
7
ICD-11 Complex PTSD in US National and Veteran Samples: Prevalence and Structural Associations with PTSD.美国国家和退伍军人样本中的国际疾病分类第11版复杂性创伤后应激障碍:患病率及与创伤后应激障碍的结构关联
Clin Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;3(2):215-229. doi: 10.1177/2167702614545480.
8
ICD-11 symposia at the World Congress of Psychiatry.世界精神病学大会上的国际疾病分类第11版专题研讨会。
World Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;14(1):110-2. doi: 10.1002/wps.20198.
9
DSM-5 and ICD-11 definitions of posttraumatic stress disorder: investigating "narrow" and "broad" approaches.DSM-5 和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍定义:探讨“狭义”和“广义”方法。
Depress Anxiety. 2014 Jun;31(6):494-505. doi: 10.1002/da.22279.
10
[Trauma and stressor-related disorders: diagnostic conceptualization in DSM-5].[创伤及应激源相关障碍:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中的诊断概念化]
Nervenarzt. 2014 May;85(5):553-63. doi: 10.1007/s00115-013-3988-0.