• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可扩张经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术——两年随访

The expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - Two years follow-up.

作者信息

Boktor Joseph Gamal, Pockett Rhys D, Verghese Navin

机构信息

Department of Spine, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.

Swansea Centre for Health Economics, College of human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

出版信息

J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):50-55. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_21_18.

DOI:10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_21_18
PMID:29755237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5934965/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective, observational study.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesize that the expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cage achieves satisfactory clinical outcomes while allowing for safe placement, improvement, and maintenance of foraminal and disc dimensions at 24 months postsurgery with low risk of cage migration, subsidence, and nerve injury.

METHODS

TLIF with expandable cages was performed in 54 patients (62 levels) over a 24-month-period using open midline or minimally invasive surgery techniques with placement of Globus Caliber, Rise, or Altera expandable cages. All patients underwent clinical and radiological assessment at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1, and 2 years postoperatively. Clinical outcome was measured by Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog pain score for both back and leg (visual analog scores [VASs]). Radiological assessment was done by X-ray standing lateral position.

RESULTS

There were significant clinical improvements in ODI, VAS leg, and VAS back at all postoperative time points. Disc height, foraminal height, focal Cobb angle, and global Cobb angle were significantly increased and maintained at all time points for 24 months ( < 0.001). Dural tear occurred in one patient (1.9%). There were neither intra- or postoperative neurological complications nor cage subsidence nor migration.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results indicate that the use of an expandable interbody cage achieves good clinical outcomes by improving and maintaining foraminal dimensions and disc height with minimal complication rate.

摘要

研究设计

这是一项回顾性观察研究。

目的

我们假设,可扩张经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合(TLIF)椎间融合器在术后24个月能实现令人满意的临床效果,同时能安全置入,并改善和维持椎间孔及椎间盘尺寸,且椎间融合器移位、下沉及神经损伤风险低。

方法

在24个月期间,对54例患者(62个节段)采用开放中线或微创手术技术进行带可扩张椎间融合器的TLIF手术,置入Globus Caliber、Rise或Altera可扩张椎间融合器。所有患者在术后6周、6个月、1年和2年接受临床和影像学评估。临床疗效通过Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、腰背部和腿部视觉模拟疼痛评分(视觉模拟评分[VAS])进行测量。影像学评估通过站立位X线侧位片进行。

结果

在所有术后时间点,ODI、腿部VAS和腰背部VAS均有显著临床改善。椎间盘高度、椎间孔高度、局部Cobb角和整体Cobb角在所有时间点均显著增加并在24个月内保持稳定(<0.001)。1例患者(1.9%)发生硬脊膜撕裂。术中及术后均未出现神经并发症,也没有椎间融合器下沉或移位。

结论

这些初步结果表明,使用可扩张椎间融合器通过改善和维持椎间孔尺寸及椎间盘高度,并发症发生率极低,从而取得了良好的临床效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/01fad460fb75/JCVJS-9-50-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/b7cecb0316f9/JCVJS-9-50-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/35ce04c6ba6d/JCVJS-9-50-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/70b42793683e/JCVJS-9-50-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/6d829bcea959/JCVJS-9-50-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/5b06244562c6/JCVJS-9-50-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/7131fc9fc767/JCVJS-9-50-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/a45f4a0dabc8/JCVJS-9-50-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/01fad460fb75/JCVJS-9-50-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/b7cecb0316f9/JCVJS-9-50-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/35ce04c6ba6d/JCVJS-9-50-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/70b42793683e/JCVJS-9-50-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/6d829bcea959/JCVJS-9-50-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/5b06244562c6/JCVJS-9-50-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/7131fc9fc767/JCVJS-9-50-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/a45f4a0dabc8/JCVJS-9-50-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa09/5934965/01fad460fb75/JCVJS-9-50-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
The expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - Two years follow-up.可扩张经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术——两年随访
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):50-55. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_21_18.
2
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Expandable Cages.使用可扩张椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 May 15;13(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00062. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
3
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
4
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.使用可扩张与静态椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:矢状节段和骨盆参数的影像学评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197.
5
Two-year Clinical and Radiographic Results with a Multidimensional, Expandable Interbody Implant in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery.微创腰椎手术中使用多维可扩张椎间融合器的两年临床及影像学结果
Cureus. 2020 Feb 21;12(2):e7070. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7070.
6
Expandable cages that expand both height and lordosis provide improved immediate effect on sagittal alignment and short-term clinical outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).在微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS TLIF)后,能够同时增加高度和恢复腰椎前凸的可扩张椎间融合器对矢状面排列和短期临床疗效具有更好的即刻效果。
J Spine Surg. 2024 Mar 20;10(1):55-67. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-106. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
7
Biplanar Expandable Cages for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Are Safe and Achieve Good 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in an Asian Population.双平面可扩张椎间融合器用于经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术在亚洲人群中是安全的,并能取得良好的1年临床和影像学结果。
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):520-525. doi: 10.14444/8472. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
8
Bidirectional Expandable Technology for Transforaminal or Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Analysis of Safety and Performance.用于经椎间孔或后路腰椎椎间融合术的双向可扩张技术:安全性与性能的回顾性分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(s3):S22-S30. doi: 10.14444/7123. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
9
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术采用可扩张 cage:术后晚期沉降风险增加,但围手术期结局无明显改善:一项临床单中心研究。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Dec;156:e57-e63. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.127. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
10
Early Experience With Uniplanar Versus Biplanar Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中单平面与双平面可扩张椎间融合器的早期经验
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):487-497. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244870.435. Epub 2023 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcome and complications comparison between expandable and static cages in open TLIF surgery: A 2-year retrospective study.开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)中可扩张椎间融合器与静态椎间融合器的临床疗效及并发症比较:一项为期2年的回顾性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 22;104(34):e44042. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044042.
2
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) with Expandable Banana-Shaped Interbody Spacers-Institutional 5-Year Experience.使用可扩张香蕉形椎间融合器的经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)——机构5年经验
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 31;14(15):5402. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155402.
3
Development and internal validation of a risk score for subsidence of expandable spacers in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-indications and clinical experience.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术——适应证与临床经验
Neurol India. 2016 May-Jun;64(3):444-54. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.181536.
2
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Technology: A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of 50 Patients.使用可扩张技术的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:50例患者的临床及影像学分析
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;90:228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.075. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
3
Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.
经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)中可扩张椎间融合器下沉风险评分的开发与内部验证
Brain Spine. 2025 Jul 5;5:104322. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104322. eCollection 2025.
4
A single straight expandable cage via a hybrid posterior-transforaminal approach with rhBMP-2 or allograft provides high fusion rates with low risk of subsidence.通过后路经椎间孔混合入路使用重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2(rhBMP-2)或同种异体骨移植的单个直形可扩张椎间融合器可实现高融合率且下沉风险低。
J Spine Surg. 2025 Mar 24;11(1):1-14. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-82. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
5
Advancements in Custom 3D-Printed Titanium Interbody Spinal Fusion Cages and Their Relevance in Personalized Spine Care.定制3D打印钛椎间融合器的进展及其在个性化脊柱护理中的意义。
J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 30;14(8):809. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080809.
6
Exploring the differences in radiologic and clinical outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with single- and bi-planar expandable cages: a systematic review and meta-analysis.探讨单平面和双平面可扩张 cage 经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的影像学和临床结果差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Jan 8;47(1):36. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02277-w.
7
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with an expandable interbody device: Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes.使用可扩张椎间融合器的经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:两年临床及影像学结果
N Am Spine Soc J. 2023 Oct 13;16:100286. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100286. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Expandable versus static cages in unilateral biportal endoscopy lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) for treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS): comparison of clinical and radiological results.单侧双通道内镜下腰椎间融合术(ULIF)中可扩张与静态 cage 在治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症(DLS)中的应用:临床与影像学结果比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 17;18(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03979-z.
9
Early Experience With Uniplanar Versus Biplanar Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中单平面与双平面可扩张椎间融合器的早期经验
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):487-497. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244870.435. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
10
Biplanar Expandable Cages for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Are Safe and Achieve Good 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in an Asian Population.双平面可扩张椎间融合器用于经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术在亚洲人群中是安全的,并能取得良好的1年临床和影像学结果。
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):520-525. doi: 10.14444/8472. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
腰椎滑脱症的后外侧融合联合椎间融合术与单纯后外侧融合术相比,再次手术的发生率更低。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;138:117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
4
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion--systematic review and meta-analysis.前路腰椎椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术——系统评价与Meta分析
Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29(5):705-11. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1036838. Epub 2015 May 12.
5
Unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disorders: a prospective randomised study.单侧与双侧经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗双节段退变性腰椎疾病:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Int Orthop. 2014 Jan;38(1):111-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2026-y. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
6
Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.微创后路经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的长期耐久性:临床及影像学随访
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.
7
Examining risk factors for posterior migration of fusion cages following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a possible limitation of unilateral pedicle screw fixation.探讨经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后融合 cage 后向迁移的危险因素:单侧椎弓根螺钉固定的一个潜在局限性。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Sep;13(3):381-7. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09590.
8
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术
Surg Neurol Int. 2010 May 31;1:12. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.63905.
9
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.经皮椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 1;35(17):1615-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c70fe3.
10
Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.对比退行性和峡部裂性 1 度和 2 度滑脱的单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Oct;19(10):1780-4. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1404-z. Epub 2010 Apr 22.