Suppr超能文献

大肠息肉的大小决定了通过内镜切除它们所需的时间。

Size of colorectal polyps determines time taken to remove them endoscopically.

作者信息

Kang Heechan, Thoufeeq Mo Hameed

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Peterborough Hospitals NHS Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom.

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2018 May;6(5):E610-E615. doi: 10.1055/a-0587-4681. Epub 2018 May 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AN STUDY AIMS

Polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are effective and safe ways of removing polyps from the colon at endoscopy. Guidelines exist for advising the time allocation for diagnostic endoscopy but not for polypectomy and EMR. The aim of this study was to identify if time allocated for polypectomy and EMR at planned therapeutic lists in our endoscopy unit is sufficient for procedures to be carried out. We also wanted to identify factors that might be associated with procedures taking longer than the allocated time and to identify factors that might predict duration of these procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective case study of planned 100 lower gastrointestinal EMR and polypectomy procedures at colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy was performed and analyzed with quantitative analysis.

RESULTS

The mean actual procedural time (APT) for 100 procedures was 52 minutes and the mean allocated time (AT) was 43.05 minutes. Hence the mean APT was 9 minutes longer than the mean AT. Factors that were significantly associated with procedures taking longer than the allocated time were patient age (  = 0.029) and polyp size (  = 0.005). Factors that significant changed the actual procedure time were patient age (  = 0.018), morphology (  = 0.002) and polyp size (  < 0.001). Procedures involving flat and lateral spreading tumor (LST) type polyps took longer than the protruding ones. On multivariate analysis, polyp size was the only factor that associated with actual procedure time. Number of polyps, quality of bowel preparation, and distance of polyp from insertion did significantly change procedure duration.

CONCLUSION

Factors that significantly contribute to duration of polypectomy and EMR at lower gastrointestinal endoscopy include patient age and polyp size and morphology on univariate analysis, with polyp size being the factor with a significant association on multivariate analysis. We recommend that endoscopy units take these factors into consideration locally when allocating time for these procedures to be safe and effective.

摘要

背景与研究目的

息肉切除术和内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)是在内镜检查时从结肠切除息肉的有效且安全的方法。存在关于诊断性内镜检查时间分配的指南,但息肉切除术和EMR却没有。本研究的目的是确定在我们内镜科室的计划治疗清单中分配给息肉切除术和EMR的时间是否足以完成这些操作。我们还想确定可能与操作时间超过分配时间相关的因素,并确定可能预测这些操作持续时间的因素。

患者与方法

对结肠镜检查和乙状结肠镜检查计划进行的100例下消化道EMR和息肉切除术进行回顾性病例研究,并进行定量分析。

结果

100例操作的平均实际操作时间(APT)为52分钟,平均分配时间(AT)为43.05分钟。因此,平均APT比平均AT长9分钟。与操作时间超过分配时间显著相关的因素是患者年龄(P = 0.029)和息肉大小(P = 0.005)。显著改变实际操作时间的因素是患者年龄(P = 0.018)、形态(P = 0.002)和息肉大小(P < 0.001)。涉及扁平和平行蔓延型肿瘤(LST)类型息肉的操作比突出型息肉花费的时间更长。多因素分析显示,息肉大小是与实际操作时间相关的唯一因素。息肉数量、肠道准备质量以及息肉距插入部的距离并未显著改变操作持续时间。

结论

单因素分析显示,在下消化道内镜检查中,显著影响息肉切除术和EMR持续时间的因素包括患者年龄、息肉大小和形态,多因素分析显示息肉大小是具有显著相关性的因素。我们建议内镜科室在为这些操作分配时间时,当地应考虑这些因素,以确保安全有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f622/5943696/d80549123cf1/10-1055-a-0587-4681-i1048ei1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验