• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高质量综合真实世界死亡率终点的开发与验证

Development and Validation of a High-Quality Composite Real-World Mortality Endpoint.

作者信息

Curtis Melissa D, Griffith Sandra D, Tucker Melisa, Taylor Michael D, Capra William B, Carrigan Gillis, Holzman Ben, Torres Aracelis Z, You Paul, Arnieri Brandon, Abernethy Amy P

机构信息

Flatiron Health, New York, NY.

Genentech, South San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4460-4476. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12872. Epub 2018 May 14.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12872
PMID:29756355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6232402/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To create a high-quality electronic health record (EHR)-derived mortality dataset for retrospective and prospective real-world evidence generation.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Oncology EHR data, supplemented with external commercial and US Social Security Death Index data, benchmarked to the National Death Index (NDI).

STUDY DESIGN

We developed a recent, linkable, high-quality mortality variable amalgamated from multiple data sources to supplement EHR data, benchmarked against the highest completeness U.S. mortality data, the NDI. Data quality of the mortality variable version 2.0 is reported here.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

For advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, sensitivity of mortality information improved from 66 percent in EHR structured data to 91 percent in the composite dataset, with high date agreement compared to the NDI. For advanced melanoma, metastatic colorectal cancer, and metastatic breast cancer, sensitivity of the final variable was 85 to 88 percent. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed that improving mortality data completeness minimized overestimation of survival relative to NDI-based estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

For EHR-derived data to yield reliable real-world evidence, it needs to be of known and sufficiently high quality. Considering the impact of mortality data completeness on survival endpoints, we highlight the importance of data quality assessment and advocate benchmarking to the NDI.

摘要

目的

创建一个高质量的电子健康记录(EHR)衍生死亡率数据集,用于回顾性和前瞻性真实世界证据生成。

数据来源/研究背景:肿瘤学EHR数据,辅以外部商业数据和美国社会保障死亡指数数据,并以国家死亡指数(NDI)为基准。

研究设计

我们从多个数据源开发了一个近期可关联的高质量死亡率变量,以补充EHR数据,并以美国完整性最高的死亡率数据NDI为基准。本文报告了死亡率变量2.0版本的数据质量。

主要发现

对于晚期非小细胞肺癌,死亡率信息的敏感性从EHR结构化数据中的66%提高到复合数据集中的91%,与NDI相比日期一致性较高。对于晚期黑色素瘤、转移性结直肠癌和转移性乳腺癌,最终变量的敏感性为85%至88%。Kaplan-Meier生存分析表明,提高死亡率数据的完整性可将相对于基于NDI的估计的生存高估降至最低。

结论

为使EHR衍生数据产生可靠的真实世界证据,其质量需已知且足够高。考虑到死亡率数据完整性对生存终点的影响,我们强调了数据质量评估的重要性,并提倡以NDI为基准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a75/6232402/e5b71205c726/HESR-53-4460-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a75/6232402/8fc757385042/HESR-53-4460-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a75/6232402/e5b71205c726/HESR-53-4460-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a75/6232402/8fc757385042/HESR-53-4460-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a75/6232402/e5b71205c726/HESR-53-4460-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a High-Quality Composite Real-World Mortality Endpoint.高质量综合真实世界死亡率终点的开发与验证
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4460-4476. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12872. Epub 2018 May 14.
2
Validation analysis of a composite real-world mortality endpoint for patients with cancer in the United States.美国癌症患者复合真实世界死亡率终点的验证分析。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56(6):1281-1287. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13669. Epub 2021 May 17.
3
An evaluation of the impact of missing deaths on overall survival analyses of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients conducted in an electronic health records database.在电子健康记录数据库中评估缺失死亡对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者总体生存分析的影响。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 May;28(5):572-581. doi: 10.1002/pds.4758. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
4
Improving Real-World Mortality Data Quality in Oncology Research: Augmenting Electronic Medical Records With Obituary, Social Security Death Index, and Commercial Claims Data.提高肿瘤学研究中真实世界死亡率数据质量:利用讣告、社会保障死亡索引和商业索赔数据来增强电子病历。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Sep;7:e2300014. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00014.
5
Using Electronic Health Records to Derive Control Arms for Early Phase Single-Arm Lung Cancer Trials: Proof-of-Concept in Randomized Controlled Trials.利用电子健康记录为早期单臂肺癌试验衍生对照臂:随机对照试验的概念验证。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Feb;107(2):369-377. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1586. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
6
Validation of US CDC National Death Index mortality data, focusing on differences in race and ethnicity.验证美国疾病控制与预防中心国家死亡指数死亡率数据,重点关注种族和民族差异。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Jul;30(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100737.
7
Agreement and validity of electronic health record prescribing data relative to pharmacy claims data: A validation study from a US electronic health record database.电子健康记录处方数据与药房报销数据的一致性及有效性:一项来自美国电子健康记录数据库的验证研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):963-972. doi: 10.1002/pds.4234. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
8
Validating the Matching of Patients in the Linkage of a Large Hospital System's EHR with State and National Death Databases.验证大型医院系统的电子健康记录与州和国家死亡数据库的患者匹配。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Jan;12(1):82-89. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722220. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
Raising the Bar for Real-World Data in Oncology: Approaches to Quality Across Multiple Dimensions.提高肿瘤学真实世界数据的质量标准:多维度的方法。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Jan;8:e2300046. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00046.
10
Sharing of clinical data in a maternity setting: how do paper hand-held records and electronic health records compare for completeness?产科环境下临床数据的共享:纸质手持记录与电子健康记录在完整性方面如何比较?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 21;14:650. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0650-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-4 Versus Real-World Physician's Choice of Therapy from the Flatiron Registry in Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma.cilta-cabtagene autoleucel在CARTITUDE-4研究中与来那度胺难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者实际接受的医生选择治疗方案相比的疗效对比:来自Flatiron注册研究的数据
Adv Ther. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03308-2.
2
Cardiovascular Events in Individuals Treated With Sulfonylureas or Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors.使用磺脲类药物或二肽基肽酶4抑制剂治疗的个体发生的心血管事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2523067. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.23067.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Real-world Data for Clinical Evidence Generation in Oncology.真实世界数据在肿瘤学临床证据生成中的应用。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Nov 1;109(11). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx187.
2
Real-World Evidence - What Is It and What Can It Tell Us?真实世界证据——它是什么以及能告诉我们什么?
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2293-2297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1609216.
3
Consequences for healthcare quality and research of the exclusion of records from the Death Master File.将记录从死亡主文件中排除对医疗质量和研究的影响。
Real-world effectiveness of palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor in HR+/HER2- MBC patients living in disadvantaged neighborhoods.
哌柏西利联合芳香化酶抑制剂在生活于弱势社区的HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌患者中的真实世界疗效
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025 Jul 21;11(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s41523-025-00786-z.
4
Real-World Germline BRCA Testing, Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Utilization, and Survival Outcomes in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.人表皮生长因子受体2阴性转移性乳腺癌的真实世界种系BRCA检测、聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂的应用及生存结果
JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Jul;9:e2400814. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00814. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
5
Survival Trends in Urothelial Cancer Before and After ICIs and Antibody Drug Conjugates.免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)和抗体药物偶联物应用前后尿路上皮癌的生存趋势
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2519524. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.19524.
6
Clinical Outcomes of Perioperative Immunotherapy in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.可切除非小细胞肺癌围手术期免疫治疗的临床结局
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2517953. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17953.
7
Behavior of test specificity under an imperfect gold standard: findings from a simulation study and analysis of real-world oncology data.在不完善金标准下测试特异性的表现:模拟研究结果及真实世界肿瘤学数据分析
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 May 30;25(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02603-4.
8
Recovering missing electronic health record mortality data with a machine learning-enhanced data linkage process.通过机器学习增强的数据链接过程恢复缺失的电子健康记录死亡率数据。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Jun 1;32(6):1061-1065. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf060.
9
Practice Patterns and Survival Outcomes of Immunotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.转移性结直肠癌免疫治疗的实践模式与生存结果
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e251186. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1186.
10
Analysis of Real-World Progression and Insufficient Response Variables and Related Endpoints Among Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的真实世界病情进展、反应不足变量及相关终点分析
Adv Ther. 2025 Apr;42(4):1979-1993. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03143-5. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jan 1;6(1):124-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.968826.
4
Demise of a vital resource.一种重要资源的消亡。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Jan;143(1):37-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.11.028.
5
A primer and comparative review of major US mortality databases.美国主要死亡率数据库入门与比较综述
Ann Epidemiol. 2002 Oct;12(7):462-8. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00285-x.
6
Utility of the National Death Index for ascertainment of mortality among cancer prevention study II participants.国家死亡指数在确定癌症预防研究II参与者死亡率方面的效用。
Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Jan 15;137(2):235-41. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116664.