• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨关节炎互联网信息质量和内容的国际评估。

International assessment on quality and content of internet information on osteoarthritis.

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research (OrACORe), Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Aug;26(8):1017-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 May 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2018.04.017
PMID:29758353
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Osteoarthritis is one of the leading causes of global disability. Numerous studies have assessed the quality and content of online health information; however, how information content varies between multiple countries remains unknown. The primary objective of this study was to examine how the quality and content of online health information on osteoarthritis compares on an international scale.

METHODS

Internet searches for the equivalent of "knee osteoarthritis treatment" were performed in ten countries around the world. For each country, the first ten websites were evaluated using a custom scoring form examining: website type; quality and reliability using the DISCERN and Health-on-the-Net (HON) frameworks; and treatment content based on three international osteoarthritis treatment guidelines. Consistency of search results between countries speaking the same language was also assessed.

RESULTS

Significant differences in all scoring metrics existed between countries speaking different languages. Western countries scored higher than more eastern countries, there were no differences between the United States and Mexico in any of the scoring metrics, and HON certified websites were of higher quality and reliability. Searches in different countries speaking the same language had at least 70% overlap.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of online health information on knee osteoarthritis varies significantly between countries speaking different languages. Differential access to quality, accurate, and safe health information online may represent a novel but important health inequality. Future efforts are needed to translate online health resources into additional languages. In the interim, patients may seek websites that display the HON seal.

摘要

目的

骨关节炎是全球致残的主要原因之一。许多研究已经评估了在线健康信息的质量和内容;然而,多个国家之间的信息内容差异仍不清楚。本研究的主要目的是检查骨关节炎在线健康信息的质量和内容在国际范围内的差异。

方法

在全球十个国家进行了相当于“膝关节骨关节炎治疗”的互联网搜索。对于每个国家,使用一个自定义评分表评估前十个网站:网站类型;使用 DISCERN 和 Health-on-the-Net (HON) 框架评估质量和可靠性;根据三个国际骨关节炎治疗指南评估治疗内容。还评估了讲同一种语言的国家之间搜索结果的一致性。

结果

讲不同语言的国家之间的所有评分指标都存在显著差异。西方国家的评分高于更多的东方国家,美国和墨西哥在任何评分指标上都没有差异,并且 HON 认证的网站质量和可靠性更高。讲同一种语言的不同国家的搜索结果至少有 70%的重叠。

结论

讲不同语言的国家之间膝关节骨关节炎在线健康信息的质量存在显著差异。在线获取优质、准确和安全健康信息的机会差异可能代表一种新的但重要的健康不平等。需要努力将在线健康资源翻译成其他语言。在此期间,患者可能会寻求显示 HON 印章的网站。

相似文献

1
International assessment on quality and content of internet information on osteoarthritis.骨关节炎互联网信息质量和内容的国际评估。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Aug;26(8):1017-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 May 23.
2
Language preferences on websites and in Google searches for human health and food information.网站以及谷歌搜索中关于人类健康和食品信息的语言偏好。
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Jun 28;9(2):e18. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e18.
3
Quality of web-based information for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.基于网络的骨关节炎信息质量:一项横断面研究。
Physiotherapy. 2018 Sep;104(3):318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
4
Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.基于互联网的资源经常提供关于术前禁食的不准确和过时的建议:一项系统综述。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1463-1468. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001590.
5
Surfing Behind a Boat: Quality and Reliability of Online Resources on Scaphoid Fractures.船后冲浪:舟骨骨折在线资源的质量与可靠性
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2016 Oct;21(3):374-81. doi: 10.1142/S2424835516500375.
6
Accessibility, nature and quality of health information on the Internet: a survey on osteoarthritis.互联网上健康信息的可及性、性质和质量:一项关于骨关节炎的调查
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Mar;44(3):382-5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh498. Epub 2004 Nov 30.
7
Acute low back pain information online: an evaluation of quality, content accuracy and readability of related websites.在线急性下背痛信息:相关网站的质量、内容准确性及可读性评估
Man Ther. 2012 Aug;17(4):318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.02.019. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
8
Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.评估关于系统性红斑狼疮的在线健康信息的质量、可靠性和可读性。
Lupus. 2018 Oct;27(12):1911-1917. doi: 10.1177/0961203318793213. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
9
Female urinary incontinence health information quality on the Internet: a multilingual evaluation.互联网上女性尿失禁健康信息的质量:多语言评估
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jan;27(1):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2742-5. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
10
Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.袖状胃切除术互联网信息质量评估
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 May-Jun;11(3):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Online Health Information-Seeking Behaviors Among the Chongqing Population: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.重庆人群的在线健康信息搜索行为:横断面问卷调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 May 5;9:e56028. doi: 10.2196/56028.
2
In Web We Trust: The Promised Cannabidiol Effects on Obesity as a Matter of Language and Marketing on Webpages.我们信任网络:网页上关于大麻二酚对肥胖影响的语言与营销承诺
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2025;23(7):780-786. doi: 10.2174/011570159X333465241121184404.
3
Internet search analysis on the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: What do people ask and read online?
类风湿关节炎治疗的互联网搜索分析:人们在网上问了什么、看了什么?
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 22;18(9):e0285869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285869. eCollection 2023.
4
Analyzing the Quality and Readability of Online Hyaluronic Acid Knee Injection Resources.分析在线透明质酸膝关节注射资源的质量和可读性。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 9;15(8):e43225. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43225. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Virtual Tools to Enable Management of Knee Osteoarthritis.用于膝关节骨关节炎管理的虚拟工具
Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol. 2023 Mar 11:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s40674-023-00202-2.
6
Recommendations on patient-facing websites regarding diagnostic imaging for low back, knee, and shoulder pain: A scoping review.关于面向患者的网站上针对腰、膝和肩痛的诊断性影像学检查的建议:一项范围综述。
PEC Innov. 2022 Apr 19;1:100040. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100040. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Quality and readability of online patient information on treatment for erectile dysfunction.关于勃起功能障碍治疗的在线患者信息的质量与可读性。
BJUI Compass. 2021 May 6;2(6):412-418. doi: 10.1002/bco2.87. eCollection 2021 Nov.
8
Investigation of the Readability and Reliability of Online Health Information for Cancer Patients During the Coronavirus Pandemic.在冠状病毒大流行期间调查癌症患者在线健康信息的可理解性和可靠性。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Apr;38(2):462-466. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02140-4. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
9
Frequency of Online Health Information Seeking and Types of Information Sought Among the General Chinese Population: Cross-sectional Study.中文人群在线健康信息搜索的频率和搜索信息的类型:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 2;23(12):e30855. doi: 10.2196/30855.
10
Quality and readability of online information on idiopathic subglottic stenosis.关于特发性声门下狭窄的在线信息的质量和可读性。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Aug 10;6(5):1068-1076. doi: 10.1002/lio2.629. eCollection 2021 Oct.