Department of Social Psychology and Social Neuroscience, Institute of Psychology,
Center for Cognition, Learning and Memory, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
J Neurosci. 2018 May 30;38(22):5196-5208. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0047-18.2018. Epub 2018 May 14.
When another person tries to control one's decisions, some people might comply, but many will feel the urge to act against that control. This control aversion can lead to suboptimal decisions and it affects social interactions in many societal domains. To date, however, it has been unclear what drives individual differences in control-averse behavior. Here, we address this issue by measuring brain activity with fMRI while healthy female and male human participants made choices that were either free or controlled by another person, with real consequences to both interaction partners. In addition, we assessed the participants' affects, social cognitions, and motivations via self-reports. Our results indicate that the social cognitions perceived distrust and lack of understanding for the other person play a key role in explaining control aversion at the behavioral level. At the neural level, we find that control-averse behavior can be explained by functional connectivity between the inferior parietal lobule and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, brain regions commonly associated with attention reorientation and cognitive control. Further analyses reveal that the individual strength of functional connectivity complements and partially mediates the self-reported social cognitions in explaining individual differences in control-averse behavior. These findings therefore provide valuable contributions to a more comprehensive model of control aversion. Control aversion is a prevalent phenomenon in our society. When someone tries to control their decisions, many people tend to act against the control. This can lead to suboptimal decisions such as noncompliance to medical treatments or disobeying the law. The degree to which individuals engage in control-averse behavior, however, varies significantly. Understanding the proximal mechanisms that underlie individual differences in control-averse behavior has potential policy implications, for example, when designing policies aimed at increasing compliance with vaccination recommendations, and is therefore a highly relevant research goal. Here, we identify a neural mechanism between parietal and prefrontal brain regions that can explain individual differences in control-averse behavior. This mechanism provides novel insights into control aversion beyond what is accessible through self-reports.
当另一个人试图控制一个人的决策时,有些人可能会服从,但许多人会感到有反抗这种控制的冲动。这种控制回避可能导致次优决策,并影响许多社会领域的社会互动。然而,迄今为止,尚不清楚是什么导致了控制回避行为的个体差异。在这里,我们通过功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)测量健康的女性和男性人类参与者的大脑活动,让他们在有真实后果的情况下做出自己决定或由他人控制的决定。此外,我们通过自我报告评估参与者的情绪、社会认知和动机。我们的研究结果表明,对他人的不信任和缺乏理解的社会认知在解释行为层面上的控制回避方面起着关键作用。在神经层面上,我们发现控制回避行为可以通过顶下小叶和背外侧前额叶皮层之间的功能连接来解释,这些大脑区域通常与注意力重新定向和认知控制有关。进一步的分析表明,功能连接的个体强度补充并部分介导了自我报告的社会认知,以解释控制回避行为的个体差异。因此,这些发现为控制回避的更全面模型提供了有价值的贡献。控制回避是我们社会中的一种普遍现象。当有人试图控制他们的决策时,许多人往往会反抗这种控制。这可能导致非依从性的治疗或不遵守法律等次优决策。然而,个体参与控制回避行为的程度差异很大。了解导致控制回避行为个体差异的近端机制具有潜在的政策意义,例如,在设计旨在提高疫苗接种建议依从性的政策时,因此这是一个非常相关的研究目标。在这里,我们确定了顶叶和前额叶大脑区域之间的神经机制,可以解释控制回避行为的个体差异。这种机制提供了超越自我报告的控制回避的新见解。