Suppr超能文献

可调环股骨皮质悬吊固定在前交叉韧带重建中的应用:与骨螺钉固定的即刻生物力学比较。

Adjustable-Loop Femoral Cortical Suspensory Fixation for Patellar Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Time Zero Biomechanical Comparison With Interference Screw Fixation.

机构信息

Duke Sports Science Institute, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(8):1857-1862. doi: 10.1177/0363546518771365. Epub 2018 May 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adjustable-loop cortical buttons for femoral fixation of bone-tendon-bone grafts have potential advantages over interference screw fixation; however, these devices have not been benchmarked biomechanically against interference screws. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to compare the time zero biomechanical properties of commercially available, adjustable-loop cortical button and metallic interference screws for femoral fixation of bone-tendon-bone grafts. It was hypothesized that no significant differences would be found in biomechanical properties between fixation techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Adjustable-loop cortical buttons (n = 8) and metallic interference screws (n = 8) were used to fix matched pairs of human bone-tendon-bone allografts in porcine distal femurs. These constructs were preconditioned (10 N to 50 N at 1 Hz, 10 cycles), subjected to cyclic loading (50 N to 250 N at 1 Hz, 500 cycles), and then pulled to failure at 20 mm/min.

RESULTS

The loads to failure (mean ± SD, 700 ± 256 N vs 688 ± 215 N, P = .92) and linear stiffnesses (219 ± 48 N/mm vs 218 ± 49 N/mm, P = .97) for the adjustable-loop cortical button and metallic interference screws, respectively, were not significantly different. Cyclic displacement was higher in the adjustable-loop cortical button group (2.1 ± 0.6 mm vs 1.3 ± 0.4 mm, P = .01). The mechanism of failure was different between groups, with bone block slippage occurring most commonly in the interference screw group (n = 5) and fracture of the bone block through the suture hole occurring most commonly in the adjustable-loop cortical button group (n = 6).

CONCLUSION

Adjustable-loop cortical buttons and interference screws have similar time zero failure loads, although cyclic displacement was higher with the adjustable-loop cortical buttons. The mean difference in displacement was less than 1 mm compared with the interference screw.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Adjustable-loop cortical buttons may be an acceptable alternative to an interference screw for femoral fixation of bone-tendon-bone grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The clinical relevance of the observed differences in cyclic displacement is unknown and should be evaluated in future studies.

摘要

背景

可调环皮质按钮用于固定骨-腱-骨移植物的股骨固定具有潜在优势,优于干扰螺钉固定;然而,这些装置尚未与干扰螺钉进行生物力学基准测试。目的/假设:目的是比较商业上可用的可调环皮质按钮和金属干扰螺钉在固定骨-腱-骨移植物的股骨固定方面的零时间生物力学特性。假设在固定技术之间不会发现生物力学特性的显着差异。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

使用可调环皮质按钮(n = 8)和金属干扰螺钉(n = 8)固定匹配的人骨-腱-骨同种异体移植物在猪的股骨远端。这些结构经过预处理(1 Hz 时 10 N 至 50 N,10 个循环),进行循环加载(1 Hz 时 50 N 至 250 N,500 个循环),然后以 20 mm/min 的速度拉断。

结果

可调环皮质按钮和金属干扰螺钉的失效载荷(平均值±标准差,700 ± 256 N 与 688 ± 215 N,P =.92)和线性刚度(219 ± 48 N/mm 与 218 ± 49 N/mm,P =.97)差异无统计学意义。可调环皮质按钮组的循环位移更高(2.1 ± 0.6 mm 与 1.3 ± 0.4 mm,P =.01)。两组的失效机制不同,干扰螺钉组最常见的是骨块滑移(n = 5),可调环皮质按钮组最常见的是骨块穿过缝线孔断裂(n = 6)。

结论

可调环皮质按钮和干扰螺钉具有相似的零时间失效载荷,尽管可调环皮质按钮的循环位移更高。与干扰螺钉相比,位移的平均差异小于 1 毫米。

临床相关性

可调环皮质按钮可能是前交叉韧带重建中骨-腱-骨移植物股骨固定的可接受替代物干扰螺钉。观察到的循环位移差异的临床相关性尚不清楚,应在未来的研究中进行评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验