Infectious Diseases Research Unit, Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Lao-Lux-Laboratory, Institute Pasteur du Laos, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic.
PLoS One. 2018 May 15;13(5):e0197370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197370. eCollection 2018.
In 2015, several provinces in Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) experienced a vaccine-derived poliovirus outbreak. This survey was conducted (i) to evaluate the vaccination coverage in different settings and cohorts using the seroprevalence of anti-poliovirus (PV) antibodies as a surrogate measure, and (ii) to explore the usefulness of an ELISA in a country with limited resources and a specific epidemiological setting. IgG antibodies were assessed by ELISA in Lao children (n = 1216) and adults (n = 1228), including blood donors and health care workers. Protective antibody titers against the 3 vaccine serotypes were determined by microneutralization (VNT) in a subset of participants. More than 92% of the children had anti-poliovirus antibodies, regardless of nutritional status or access to health care, highlighting the success of the vaccination outreach activities in the country. In contrast, anti-poliovirus seroprevalence reached only 81.7% in blood donors and 71.9% in health care workers. Participants born before the introduction of poliovirus vaccination in Lao PDR were considerably less likely to be seropositive. These findings align with the epidemiology of the outbreak. Neutralizing antibodies against at least one of the 3 poliovirus serotypes were detected in all children (99/99) and 93/99 had antibodies against all serotypes. Similarly, all health care workers had neutralizing antibodies against at least one and 92/99 against all serotypes. The comparison of both assays shows an acceptable underestimation of vaccine coverage in children by ELISA, but a low sensitivity of the ELISA in the adults. We show that the ELISA is a reasonable alternative to the VNT in particular in vaccinated children, that an improved version should be serotype specific, and that negativity thresholds should be revisited for optimal sensitivity and specificity. Thus, polio-free countries with an uncertain vaccination coverage and limited laboratory capacity, that are at risk of vaccine-derived poliovirus outbreaks or of re-importation of wild poliovirus may benefit from an improved ELISA for cohort studies to evaluate their immunization program in children.
2015 年,老挝人民民主共和国(老挝)的几个省份发生了疫苗衍生脊髓灰质炎病毒暴发。本研究旨在:(i) 通过血清抗脊髓灰质炎病毒(PV)抗体的阳性率评估不同环境和队列的疫苗接种覆盖率,作为替代指标;(ii) 探索在资源有限且具有特定流行病学背景的国家中酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)的有用性。ELISA 检测了老挝儿童(n = 1216)和成人(n = 1228),包括献血者和卫生保健工作者的 IgG 抗体。选择部分参与者通过微量中和试验(VNT)确定针对 3 种疫苗血清型的保护性抗体滴度。无论营养状况或获得医疗保健的机会如何,超过 92%的儿童具有抗脊髓灰质炎病毒抗体,这突显了该国疫苗接种活动的成功。相比之下,献血者的抗脊髓灰质炎病毒血清阳性率仅为 81.7%,卫生保健工作者为 71.9%。在老挝引入脊髓灰质炎疫苗之前出生的参与者,其血清阳性率明显较低。这些发现与暴发的流行病学一致。所有儿童(99/99)和 93/99 均至少有一种血清型的中和抗体。同样,所有卫生保健工作者至少有一种血清型的中和抗体,92/99 针对所有血清型。两种检测方法的比较显示,ELISA 对儿童疫苗接种覆盖率的低估程度可以接受,但 ELISA 对成人的敏感性较低。我们表明,ELISA 是 VNT 的合理替代方法,尤其是在接种疫苗的儿童中,改进后的 ELISA 应具有血清型特异性,并且应重新审视阴性阈值,以实现最佳的敏感性和特异性。因此,具有不确定疫苗接种覆盖率和有限实验室能力的无脊髓灰质炎国家,且面临疫苗衍生脊髓灰质炎病毒暴发或野生脊髓灰质炎病毒再次输入的风险的国家,可能会受益于改良的 ELISA 进行队列研究,以评估其儿童免疫计划。