Nakagawa Kazuma, King Sage L, Seto Todd B
The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, United States.
Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, United States.
Front Neurol. 2018 May 1;9:291. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00291. eCollection 2018.
Basal ganglia hemorrhage (BG-ICH) and thalamic hemorrhage (TH-ICH) have been historically grouped into a single "deep" hemorrhage group in prior studies. We aimed to assess whether BG-ICH and TH-ICH have different optimal hematoma volume cut points in predicting functional outcome.
Patients with BG-ICH and TH-ICH with no preexisting disabilities who were enrolled in a single-center intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) cohort study were studied. The hematoma volume of patients who achieved modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of ≤2 and ≤3 at 3 months were compared between BG-ICH and TH-ICH groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created to determine the optimal hematoma volume cut points in predicting 3-month mRS of ≤2 and ≤3 for BG-ICH and TH-ICH groups.
A total of 135 (81 BG-ICH and 54 TH-ICH) patients were studied. The hematoma volume among those with 3-month mRS ≤ 2 (BG-ICH: 9.5 ± 5.4 cm vs. TH-ICH: 5.1 ± 4.9 cm, = 0.01) and 3-month mRS ≤ 3 (BG-ICH: 14.2 ± 13.4 cm vs. TH-ICH: 4.7 ± 4.1 cm, = 0.001) were smaller in TH-ICH than BG-ICH. The area under the ROC curve in predicting mRS ≤ 2 was 0.838 for BG-ICH (optimal hematoma volume cut point: 18.0 cm, sensitivity 72.1%, specificity 95.0%) and 0.802 for TH-ICH (optimal hematoma volume cut point: 4.6 cm, sensitivity 83.8%, specificity 70.6%); and in predicting mRS ≤ 3 was 0.826 for BG-ICH (optimal hematoma volume cut point: 28.8 cm, sensitivity 71.4%, specificity 93.8%) and 0.902 for TH-ICH (optimal hematoma volume cut point: 5.5 cm, sensitivity 92.9%, specificity 76.9%).
TH-ICH have smaller optimal hematoma volume cut points than BG-ICH in predicting functional outcome.
在以往的研究中,基底节区脑出血(BG-ICH)和丘脑脑出血(TH-ICH)在历史上被归为单一的“深部”出血组。我们旨在评估BG-ICH和TH-ICH在预测功能结局方面是否具有不同的最佳血肿体积切点。
对纳入单中心脑出血(ICH)队列研究的无既往残疾的BG-ICH和TH-ICH患者进行研究。比较BG-ICH组和TH-ICH组在3个月时改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分为≤2和≤3的患者的血肿体积。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,以确定BG-ICH组和TH-ICH组在预测3个月mRS评分为≤2和≤3时的最佳血肿体积切点。
共研究了135例患者(81例BG-ICH和54例TH-ICH)。3个月mRS≤2的患者(BG-ICH:9.5±5.4cm³ vs. TH-ICH:5.1±4.9cm³,P = 0.01)和3个月mRS≤3的患者(BG-ICH:14.2±13.4cm³ vs. TH-ICH:4.7±4.1cm³,P = 0.001)中,TH-ICH的血肿体积小于BG-ICH。预测mRS≤2时,BG-ICH的ROC曲线下面积为0.838(最佳血肿体积切点:18.0cm³,敏感性72.1%,特异性95.0%),TH-ICH为0.802(最佳血肿体积切点:4.6cm³,敏感性83.8%,特异性70.6%);预测mRS≤3时,BG-ICH的ROC曲线下面积为0.826(最佳血肿体积切点:28.8cm³,敏感性71.4%,特异性93.8%),TH-ICH为0.902(最佳血肿体积切点:5.5cm³,敏感性92.9%,特异性76.9%)。
在预测功能结局方面,TH-ICH的最佳血肿体积切点小于BG-ICH。